Working Party on Fisheries Statistics 14 October 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EDIT validation tool item 8 of the agenda Structural Business Statistics Working Group 14 April 2015, Luxembourg Arlind Dobërdolani.
Advertisements

Agenda item 5 ESS Vision 2020: other activities DIGICOM and SIMSTAT DIME-ITDG joint plenary Luxembourg,
Eurostat Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2015 Working Group on Article 64 and Article 65 of the Staff Regulations Meeting.
Eurojust cases involving crimes against children
Weighting issues in EU-LFS
Phasing out the use of lead shot in wetlands
Update on the UOE 2012 data collection
5. Areas under organic farming
Progress report Item 2 Eurostat Task Force on Annual Financial Accounts Frankfurt, 4 March 2016.
Working Party “Cooperation on Land Cover/Use Statistics”
Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2015 A65 exercise
No document Ag 08 ESA2010 (SNA 2008)
Public use files for ESS microdata
LAMAS Working Group January 2016
Regional Labour Market
Item 4.2 – Implementation of the Adult Education Survey
Collection legislation
Compliance Item 4.2 Compliance Doc. ASA/TE/743-rev1
Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals and country assessments
3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery
TG EHIS January 2012 Item 3.2 of the agenda EHIS wave 1 anonymised data Bart De Norre, Eurostat.
Education and Training Statistics Working Group
LAMAS October 2017 Agenda Item 3.2 Labour Cost Indices state of play Daniel Iscru Hubertus Vreeswijk.
Ag.No Price statistics briefing (a) HICP
Agenda Item 2.1 SES 2014: follow-up
Inconsistencies observed in the recording of monetary gold
8.1 JFSQ – Timeliness and completeness
LAMAS October 2016 Agenda Item 2.1
Document reference, if any
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Progress Report on Annual Financial Accounts
Working Party on Fisheries Statistics 14 October 2013
Reporting – Art 17 of HD and Art 12 of BD
Item 7.1 Implementation of the 2016 Adult Education Survey
Item 8.1 Implementation of the 2016 Adult Education Survey
Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2016 A65 exercise
LAMAS Working Group 6-7 December 2017
Item 7.1 – Overview of 2012 UOE data collection
SBS Quality reporting item 4 of the agenda
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
State of play: data transmission, validation and dissemination
Working Party on Fisheries Statistics 14 October 2013
Proposal for granting access to HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS (HBS)
Item 7.1 – Overview of 2013 UOE data collection
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
ITEM 3 - WORK CARRIED OUT SINCE LAST WG MEETING (16-17 JUNE 2005)
Item 4.1 – Overview of 2014 UOE data collection
LAMAS Working Group 7 – 8 December 2016
Education and Training Statistics Working Group Meeting 5/6 June 2012 Item 4.2 Progress report on education survey data and metadata Sylvain Jouhette.
3.6. Impact of population and housing census results on population stocks and on LFS and SILC–follow-up DSS Meeting September 2012.
EuroGroups register First results of measures on advancement
Changes and Historical Time Series Oliver Heiden Eurostat.E4
Labour market statistics- State of play
Meeting of Water Directors State of transposition and implementation
Aquaculture statistics Data collection and transmission for year 2013
ESS Security and Secure exchange of information Expert Group (E4SEG) Item 1 of the agenda IT security assurance DIME/ITDG SG Meeting London 15/2/20189.
Item 4 Overview of the 2016 AES & 2015 CVTS data collection
Item 4.2 – Towards the 2016 AES Philippe Lombardo Eurostat-F5
Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark
European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Item 3 Observed consistency and revisions
LAMAS October 2018 Agenda Item 4.1 LMI Review – main scenarios
Doc.A6465/16/03 Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals
Standards and guidelines for reference metadata
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016
Handbooks for fishery statistics Item 5
Prodcom Working Group Item 03.5 – Confidentiality & dissemination of PRODCOM statistics Prodcom Working Group 18th -19th September 2014.
Prodcom Working Group Item Quality reporting and indicators
Transposition and implementation of WFD
EDAMIS3: CURRENT STATUS
Presentation transcript:

Working Party on Fisheries Statistics 14 October 2013 Item IV.B Confidentiality issues (Document FISH/334)

Table of Contents What is declared as confidential and what are the consequences? What is the legal context ? How to improve the situation?

What is declared as confidential ? (1/2) Some landings data, but main problem for aquaculture data: since 2010, more and more data is declared as confidential (for "AQ2a – aquaculture production", 3 countries declared volume data as confidential in 2010 and 8 in 2010) Doc FISH 321 (March 2012) stated "Member States have been increasingly transmitting data as confidential for fisheries and aquaculture in recent years. This is in part due to use of SDMX-ML as a transmission medium which allows more explicit flagging of confidential records than before"

What is declared as confidential ? (2/2) Declaration of confidential data for aquaculture   2010 2011 Production (aq2a) volume BE, LT, SK (3/29 + 1 :m) BE, DK, DE, LT, AT, PL, SI, FI (8/29) value BE, DK, LT, SK (4/29 + 3 :m) BE, DK, DE, LT, AT, PL, SI, FI (8/29 + 1 :m) Eggs for consumption (aq2b) vol/val derogations DK, DE, ES (3/9) Input (aq3) DE,MT (2/12 + 2 :m) Eggs for production (aq4a) number DE, FR, MT, AT, SI, SK (6) Juvenile prod. (aq4b) DE, IE, FR, MT, AT, PT, SK (7/25) Structural data (aq5) area incomplete BE, DE, IE, AT, PL (5/28) 1000 of M3 DE, PL (2/28)

What is the legal context? Regulation 223/2009 on European Statistics: confidential data is “data which allow statistical units to be identified, either directly or indirectly" A statistical unit is “the basic observation unit, namely a natural person, a household, an economic operator and other undertakings" data obtained from sources lawfully available to the public and which remain available to the public according to national legislation shall not be considered confidential

How to improve the situation? Work further on the charter prepared by the Task Force and on the IT tool Use the "Confidentiality flag" only when fully justified according to Regulation 223/2009 (Eurostat may ask for justifications) Clarify what exactly is confidential (value and/or volume) Countries may regroup confidential data into aggregates which are not confidential (aggregate species, _NK area, …) Publication of main National or EU aggregates (for totals all specises, all methods, environments, areas, …) even if some underlying data is confidential) Ask on a case by case basis if data can be published(SiF aquaculture)

Thank you for your attention! Questions The members of the WG are asked to give their opinion on: the compliance monitoring of Eurostat, the recommendations and rules to be applied for providing good quality data, the proposed NK (Not Known) sub-area codes and on the cleaning of unofficial aggregates of area codes. the pragmatic approach proposed by Eurostat as regard to the confidential data, Thank you for your attention!