Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient-derived C-terminal mutation of FANCI causes protein mislocalization and reveals putative EDGE motif function in DNA repair by Luca Colnaghi, Mathew.
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks  Kyung Yong Lee, Jun-Sub Im, Etsuko.
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks
RNF168 Promotes Noncanonical K27 Ubiquitination to Signal DNA Damage
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
USP4 Auto-Deubiquitylation Promotes Homologous Recombination
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Homeodomain Proteins Directly Regulate ATM Kinase Activity
The Tumor Suppressor MIG6 Controls Mitotic Progression and the G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint by Stabilizing the WEE1 Kinase  Mari Sasaki, Takeshi Terabayashi,
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Ken-ichi Yoshioka, Yoshiko Yoshioka, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Activation of DSB Processing Requires Phosphorylation of CtIP by ATR
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
A Role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 Family of Proteins in Activation of the APC/C Distinct from Substrate Recruitment  Yuu Kimata, Joanne E. Baxter, Andrew M.
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (August 2017)
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 18, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2008)
SUMOylation Promotes Nuclear Import and Stabilization of Polo-like Kinase 1 to Support Its Mitotic Function  Donghua Wen, Jianguo Wu, Lei Wang, Zheng.
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP
FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Wip1 Phosphatase Modulates ATM-Dependent Signaling Pathways
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis of SOSS1 Complex Assembly and Recognition of ssDNA
Presentation transcript:

Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1 Bunsyo Shiotani, Hai Dang Nguyen, Pelle Håkansson, Alexandre Maréchal, Alice Tse, Hidetoshi Tahara, Lee Zou  Cell Reports  Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 1651-1662 (May 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018 Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ATR-Mediated RPA32 Ser33 Phosphorylation in Response to CPT-Induced DSBs (A) U2OS cells were treated with 1 μM CPT in the presence or absence of 10 μM VE-821 and collected at the indicated times. The levels of the indicated proteins and the CPT-induced phosphorylation events were analyzed by western blot; *a protein cross-reacting to the phospho-Ser33 antibody. (B) Cells pretreated with 10 μM NU-7026 or DMSO for 1 hr were exposed to 1 μM CPT in the presence or absence of 10 μM NU-7026. Extracts were analyzed as in (A). (C) Cells were treated with 1 μM CPT for 1 hr, or mock treated, in the absence or presence of VE-821. Immunofluorescence analysis of RPA32 and phospho-Ser33 was performed with specific antibodies. Representative images of cells are shown in the left panel. The fractions of cells that displayed RPA32 or phospho-Ser33 foci are shown in the right panel. Error bars: SDs from three independent experiments (n = 3). (D) Cells were treated with 1 μM CPT for 2 hr, or mock treated, in the absence or presence of KU55933. Immunofluorescence analysis was performed and quantified as in (C). Error bars: SDs from three independent experiments (n = 3). (E) U2OS cells transfected with control or CtIP siRNAs were treated with 1 μM CPT and collected at the indicated time points. Extracts were analyzed as in (A). See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RPA32 and Chk1 Are Phosphorylated by ATR through Distinct Mechanisms (A–C) U2OS cells transfected with control, TopBP1 (A), Rad17 (B), or Nbs1 (C) siRNAs were treated with 1 μM CPT and collected at the indicated time points. The levels of the indicated proteins and the CPT-induced phosphorylation events were analyzed by western blot. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Nbs1 Regulates RPA32 Phosphorylation Independently of ATM Activation and DSB Resection (A) Nuclear extracts were prepared from HeLa cells transfected with TopBP1 siRNA or mock transfected. A 6 kb dsDNA fragment was resected with T7 exonuclease or exonuclease III as described in the Experimental Procedures. Resected or unresected dsDNA was added to cell extracts, and the resected-dsDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed with phosphospecific antibody. (B) The resected-dsDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed in extracts of CtIP knockdown cells and control cells as in (A). (C) The resected-dsDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed in extracts of Rad17 knockdown cells and control cells as in (A). (D) The resected-dsDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed in extracts of Nbs1 knockdown cells and control cells as in (A). Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ssDNA Is Sufficient to Induce RPA32 Phosphorylation (A) ssDNA of the indicated lengths was added to nuclear extracts, and the ssDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed with phosphospecific antibody. (B) The ssDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed in extracts of ATR knockdown cells and control cells as in (A). (C) The ssDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed in extracts of TopBP1 knockdown cells and control cells as in (A). (D) The ssDNA-induced phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 was analyzed in extracts of Nbs1 knockdown cells and control cells as in (A). Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Nbs1 Targets the MRN Complex to RPA-ssDNA (A) Biotinylated 70-nucleotide ssDNA (5 pmole) was coated with increasing amounts of purified RPA (0, 5, 10, and 20 pmole) and then incubated in cell extracts. The proteins bound to RPA-ssDNA were retrieved by streptavidin-coated beads and analyzed by western blot using the indicated antibodies. All components of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex bound to ssDNA in an RPA-dependent manner. (B) Biotinylated ssDNA was coated with either WT RPA or the RPA t-11 mutant complex purified from E. coli. The binding of Rad50 and Mre11 to RPA-ssDNA was tested as in (A). (C) Biotinylated ssDNA coated with RPA was incubated with purified MRN complex. The MRN components bound to RPA-ssDNA were analyzed by western blot. (D) Binding of purified Nbs1 to RPA-ssDNA was tested as in (C). (E) Extracts were prepared from cells transfected with control or Nbs1-2 siRNA. Biotinylated ssDNA coated with RPA was incubated in the extracts, and the proteins bound to RPA-ssDNA were analyzed by western blot using the indicated antibodies. Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mapping the RPA-ssDNA-Interacting Domain of Nbs1 (A) Schematic of the Nbs1 fragments used in this study and their ability to bind RPA-ssDNA. (B) The RPA-ssDNA-binding domain of human Nbs1 is aligned to the corresponding regions in the Nbs1 of other higher vertebrates. The conserved charged amino acids are highlighted in colors. (C) The conserved charged amino acids in the RPA-ssDNA-binding domain of Nbs1 were mutated in myc-tagged, full-length Nbs1 (KKR to EEG, DD to AA, and EDE to AAA). These Nbs1 mutants were transiently expressed in 293T cells, and their ability to bind RPA-ssDNA was tested in cell extracts using biotinylated ssDNA coated with RPA. WT Nbs1 and an Nbs1 mutant lacking the Mre11- and ATM-binding domains (Np75) were also tested as controls. (D) Myc-tagged, full-length Nbs1 (WT) and its mutant derivatives (KKR, DD, EDE, and Np75) were transiently expressed in 293T cells. The myc-tagged Nbs1 proteins were immunoprecipitated with myc antibody, and the coprecipitated Mre11 was analyzed by western blot using Mre11 antibody. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Interaction of Nbs1 and RPA Is Required for Nbs1-Mediated RPA32 Phosphorylation and Recovery of Collapsed Replication Forks (A) U2OS-derivative cell lines were established to express myc-tagged Nbs1WT and Nbs1EDE conditionally. As indicated, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml doxycycline (Dox) to induce myc-tagged Nbs1 proteins, and transfected with siNbs1-2 to knock down endogenous Nbs1. Nuclear extracts were prepared from cells, and the ability of resected dsDNA to induce RPA32 Ser33 phosphorylation was analyzed with phosphospecific antibody. (B) Myc-tagged Nbs1WT and Nbs1EDE were used to replace endogenous Nbs1 as in (A). Cells were synchronized in S phase as described in Experimental Procedures and subsequently treated with CPT (1 μM) for 45 min or mock treated. The levels of the indicated proteins and the phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 were analyzed by western blot. (C) Myc-tagged Nbs1WT and Nbs1EDE were used to replace endogenous Nbs1 as in (A). Cells were synchronized in S phase, treated with CPT (1 μM) for 1 hr or mock treated, and then released into CPT-free medium. After 24 hr, cells were immunostained with antibody to γH2AX and the fractions of cells with γH2AX foci were quantified. Error bars: SDs from three independent experiments (n = 3). (D) A model that depicts the two distinct modes of ATR activation at resected DSBs. Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 ATR Specifically Mediates the Phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser33 in Response to CPT, Related to Figure 1 (A and B) U2OS cells were treated with 10 μM VE-821 or mock treated for 1 hr and subsequently exposed to 1 μM CPT for 1hr. The levels of the indicated proteins and the CPT-induced phosphorylation events were analyzed by Western blot. (C) Cells were treated with 1 μM CPT for 1 hr, or mock treated, in the absence or presence of KU55933. Immunofluorescence analysis of RPA32 and phospho-Ser33 was performed with specific antibodies. The fractions of cells that displayed RPA32 or phospho-Ser33 foci are shown. Error bars: standard deviations from three independent experiments (n = 3). (D) The levels of ATM and DNA-PKcs in GM00637 (normal human fibroblasts), GM05849 (AT), and M059J (DNA-PKcs deficient) cells were analyzed by Western blot. KU70 serves as a loading control. (E) GM05849 and M059J cells were treated with 1 μM CPT in the presence or absence of NU7026 and KU55933 as indicated. Cells were collected at the indicated time points, and extracts were analyzed as in (A). (F) U2OS cells were treated with 1 mM hydroxyurea (HU). Cells were collected at the indicated time points, and extracts were analyzed as in (A). Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Genetic Requirements of CPT-Induced RPA32 Phosphorylation, Related to Figure 2 (A) U2OS cells were transfected with control or ATR siRNA, and then treated with 1 μM CPT for 1 hr. The levels of the indicated proteins and the CPT-induced phosphorylation events were analyzed by Western blot. (B) Cells were transfected with control or Nbs1-2 siRNA, and cell-cycle profiles were analyzed by flow cytometer three days after transfection. (C) NBS-IL1 cells and the Nbs1-complemented derivative cells were treated with 1 μM CPT or mock treated for 1h. The levels of the indicated proteins and the CPT-induced phosphorylation events were analyzed as in (A). (D) U2OS cells were transfected with control siRNA, Nbs1-1 siRNA, Rad17-2 siRNA, or the combination of Nbs1-1 and Rad17-2 siRNAs. All siRNAs were used at 40 nM except that Nbs1 and Rad17 siRNAs were used at 20 nM each in the double knockdown. CPT treatment and Western blot were performed as in (A). Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Mapping the RPA-ssDNA-Binding Domain of Nbs1, Related to Figure 6 (A and B) Myc-tagged full-length Nbs1 (WT) and Nbs1 fragments (see Figure 6A) were transiently expressed in 293T cells. Extracts from the myc-Nbs1 expressing cells were incubated with biotinylated ssDNA coated with RPA, and the myc-Nbs1 proteins bound to RPA-ssDNA were analyzed by Western blot using anti-myc antibody. Cell Reports 2013 3, 1651-1662DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.018) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions