Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
X-Ray Structure of the hRORα LBD at 1.63 Å
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor CAR
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Gino Cingolani, Janna Bednenko, Matthew T Gillespie, Larry Gerace 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Mechanism of Sirtuin Inhibition by Nicotinamide: Altering the NAD+ Cosubstrate Specificity of a Sir2 Enzyme  José L. Avalos, Katherine M. Bever, Cynthia.
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2018)
Structural Insights into the Mode of Action of a Pure Antiestrogen
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 491-502 (February 2005) Crystallographic Identification and Functional Characterization of Phospholipids as Ligands for the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Steroidogenic Factor-1  Yong Li, Mihwa Choi, Greg Cavey, Jennifer Daugherty, Kelly Suino, Amanda Kovach, Nathan C. Bingham, Steven A. Kliewer, H.Eric Xu  Molecular Cell  Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 491-502 (February 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002

Figure 1 Characterization and Crystallization of the Purified SF-1 Protein (A) Binding of various LXXLL motifs to the purified SF-1 LBD as measured by AlphaScreen assays. The background reading of either SF-1 or the peptides alone is less than 200. The peptide sequences are listed in the Experimental Procedures. The results are the average of three experiments, with error bars showing SDs. (B) Crystals of the SF-1/SHP ID1 complex. Molecular Cell 2005 17, 491-502DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002)

Figure 2 Overall Structure of the SF-1/SHP ID1 Complex (A) Ribbon representation of the SF-1/SHP complex in two views separated by 90°. SF-1 is colored in red and the SHP ID1 motif is in yellow. The bound phospholipid ligand is shown in space-filling representation with carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphate depicted in green, red, blue, and purple, respectively. (B) Sequence alignment of the mouse and human SF-1 and LRH-1 with the Drosophila FTZ-F1. The secondary structural elements are annotated below the sequence alignment, and the residues that contact the phospholipid are shaded gray. The additional length of helix H2 observed in the mouse LRH-1 structure is shown in black. Molecular Cell 2005 17, 491-502DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002)

Figure 3 The Large SF-1 Ligand Binding Pocket (A) Two 90° views of the SF-1/SHP/phospholipid ternary complex with the bound phospholipid ligand (PLD) shown in space-filling representation and the SF-1 pocket shown in white surface. (B) The entrance to the SF-1 pocket (white surface) showing the exposure of the bound phospholipid (spheres) to solvent. (C) An overlap of the SF-1/SHP complex (blue) with the mouse LRH-1 LBD structure (yellow) showing the length of the SF-1 helix H2. The movements of helices H3 and H10 that contribute to the larger SF-1 pocket are also indicated. (D and E) Two close-up views of the SF-1 pocket (white surface) with the mouse LRH-1 structure (yellow). The structural changes that contribute to the larger SF-1 pocket are also indicated. Molecular Cell 2005 17, 491-502DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002)

Figure 4 Recognition of Phospholipids by SF-1 (A and B) Two views of the electron density map showing the phospholipid ligand and the surrounding SF-1 residues. The map is calculated with 2Fo − Fc coefficients and is contoured at 1 σ. Key residues and chemical moieties of the bound phospholipids are noted, and the hydrogen bonds between K441 and the phosphate moiety of the phospholipid are indicated as yellow arrows. (C) MS analysis of the denaturing SF-1 showing the multiple charged species of the apo protein and the two distinct peaks at 716 Da and 690 Da. (D) A deconvoluted mass spectrum of the denatured SF-1 shows the measured average molecular weight of 29614 ± 0.3 Da matches the expected molecular weight of the apo-SF-1 at 29615.5 Da. (E) MS/MS analysis of the 690 Da peak for C32:1 phospholipid generates a major product ion at 549 Da corresponding to C32:1 diacyl-glycerol. The 141 Da difference between the two peaks is consistent with the loss of the phosphoethanolamine moiety. (F) A MS/MS analysis of the 716 Da peak for C34:2 phospholipid generates a major product ion at 575 Da corresponding to C34:2 diacyl-glycerol. The 141 Da difference between the two peaks is consistent with the loss of a phosphoethanolamine moiety. Molecular Cell 2005 17, 491-502DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002)

Figure 5 Modulation of SF-1/Coactivator Interactions by Phospholipids (A) The binding of the TIF2 coactivator motif to the purified SF-1 in the absence or presence of 1.25 μM of 1,2-didodecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (12PE), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (14PE), and 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (16PC), which are phospholipids with C12, C14, and C16 fatty acid side chains, respectively. The fold of activation by phospholipids is indicated on the top of the bars. The control is the basal or the constitutive interaction of SF-1 with the TIF2 coactivator motif in the absence of exogenous ligands. (B) The effect of 10% ethanol on SF-1 binding to the TIF2 coactivator motif in the absence or presence of 1.25 μM of phospholipids with C12–C16 fatty acids. (C) The binding of the TIF2 coactivator motif to the purified mouse LRH-1 in the absence (control) or presence of 1.25 μM of phospholipids with C12–C18 fatty acids. The high basal interaction of mRH-1 with TIF2 in the absence of exogenous ligands (control) is due to its constitutive activity. (D) Dose response curves of the SF-1/TIF2 binding to phospholipids with fatty acids with sidechains of length C12 (12PE, red squares), C14 (14PE, blue triangles), C16 (16PC, purple circles), and C18 (18PCD, black squares) in the presence of 10% ethanol. (E) Dose effects of 18PCD on SF-1/TIF2 interactions in the absence of 10% ethanol. Error bars in panels (A), (B), (C), and (E) are the SDs of experiments performed in triplicate. Molecular Cell 2005 17, 491-502DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002)

Figure 6 Phospholipid Binding of SF-1 Is Important for the Receptor Activation (A–C) The locations of the eight mutated SF-1 pocket residues are shown with the SF-1 structure, where the bound phospholipid is shown with balls and sticks. Residues that affect binding of all three coactivator motifs are colored in black, and residues that show partial effect on binding are shown in blue. (D) Effects of the pocket residue mutations on SF-1 binding to coactivator peptides containing the TIF2-3, SRC1-2, and SRC1-4 LXXLL motifs, respectively. (E) Effects of 12PE (1.25 μM) on restoring TIF2 binding activity of mutated SF-1 receptors. (F) Transcriptional activity of wild-type (wt) and mutated SF-1. Expression plasmids for wt or mutant SF-1 were cotransfected with the SF-1 reporter plasmid and luciferase activity was measured and normalized to β-galactosidase as an internal control. In panels (D)–(F), the results are the average of experiments performed in triplicate, with error bars indicating SDs. Molecular Cell 2005 17, 491-502DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.002)