Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Pavlos Pissios, Iphigenia Tzameli, Peter J. Kushner, David D. Moore 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Structural Mechanisms of Nucleosome Recognition by Linker Histones
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Mechanism of SMRT Corepressor Recruitment by the BCL6 BTB Domain
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor CAR
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Pavlos Pissios, Iphigenia Tzameli, Peter J. Kushner, David D. Moore 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Structure of the Catalytic Region of DNA Ligase IV in Complex with an Artemis Fragment Sheds Light on Double-Strand Break Repair  Takashi Ochi, Xiaolong.
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 122, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structural Insights into the Mode of Action of a Pure Antiestrogen
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino, Jennifer Daugherty, H. Eric Xu  Molecular Cell  Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 367-380 (August 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Purification, Characterization, and Crystallization of the MR LBD (A) Purification of the MR LBD bound to corticosterone. The proteins shown are crude extract (lane 1), the GST column flow through (lane 2), the GST column elute (lane 3), the sample after thrombin digestion (lane 4), and final purified protein (lane 5). The molecular weight markers are shown in lane M. (B) Binding of various peptides containing coactivator or corepressor motifs to the purified MR LBD/corticosterone complex as measured by AlphaScreen assays. The background reading with the MR LBD alone is less than 200. (C) Relative binding affinity of various peptide motifs to the MR LBD in the presence of 20 nM of corticosterone or aldosterone as determined by peptide competitions, which various unlabeled peptides (500 nM) use to compete off the binding of the SRC2-3 LXXLL motif to MR. The cofactors that contain a pair of LXXLL motifs with strong binding affinity to MR are boxed. All peptides have an identical length of 15 residues except for the SRC1-4 motif, which terminates at position +7 relative to the first leucines (L+1) in the LXXLL motif, and for the AR peptides and the corepressor motifs, which are longer than the coactivator motifs. Sequences of peptides are listed in the Supplemental Data. (D) Crystals of the MR/corticosterone/SRC1-4 complex. The results in (B) and (C) are the average of experiments performed in triplicate, with error bars showing SDs. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 367-380DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Overall Structure of the MR/Corticosterone/SRC1-4 Complex (A and B) Two 90° views of the MR/corticosterone/SRC1-4 complex in ribbon representation. MR is colored in gold with its charge clamp residues colored in red (AF-2) and blue (end of H3). The SRC1-4 peptide is in yellow, and the bound corticosterone is shown in ball and stick representation with carbon and oxygen atoms depicted in green and red, respectively. Key structural elements are noted, including β-6 followed by the LYFH motif near the C-terminal end. (C) Sequence alignment of the human MR LBD with other steroid hormone receptors (GR, AR, PR, and ER). The secondary structural elements are boxed and annotated below the sequences, and the residues that form the steroid binding pockets are shaded in gray. The second charge clamp residues and K782, which comprise the two key structural features for the binding of SRC LXXLL motifs, are noted with stars, and the residues that determine MR/GR hormone specificity are labeled by arrows. The LYFH motifs near the C-terminal ends of oxosteroid receptors are underlined. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 367-380DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Recognition of the SRC1-4 LXXLL Motif and Coactivator Assembly by MR (A) Structure of the SRC1-4 LXXLL motif (green) is shown on the surface of the MR coactivator binding site. (B) The binding mode of SRC1-4 to the MR LBD. MR is in light green, and SRC1-4 is in yellow. The hydrogen bonds formed between MR and SRC1-4 are shown in arrows from hydrogen bond donors to acceptors. For residues Q-4 and Q-5, only Cα atoms are shown for clarity. (C) A 2Fo − Fc electron density map (1.0 σ) showing the structural stability of the SRC1-4 LLQQLL motif. (D) Binding affinity of various coactivator LXXLL motifs to the purified MR/corticosterone complex as determined by IC50 values from peptide competition experiments using AlphaScreen assays. The numbering scheme of the LXXLL motifs is shown on the top of the sequences. (E) Purification of PGC1α-(1+2) and SRC2-(2+3). The proteins shown are PGC1α-(1+2) (lane 1) and SRC2-(2+3) (lane 2). (F) Binding affinity of SRC2-(2+3), SRC2-2, SRC2-3, and SRC2-(M2+3) to the purified MR/corticosterone complex as determined by IC50 values from peptide competition experiments using AlphaScreen assays. SRC2-2 and SRC2-3 are peptides shown in (D). SRC2-(2+3) and SRC2-(2+3) are SRC2 protein fragments containing second and third LXXLL motifs. The second LXXLL motif of SRC2 was mutated to LXXAA in SRC2-(M2+3). (G) Binding affinity of PGC1α-(1+2), PGC1α-1, and PGC1α-2 to the purified MR/corticosterone complex as determined by IC50 values from peptide competition experiments. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 367-380DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SRC1 Potentiates Transcription by MR through the SRC1-4 Motif (A) A schematic representation of wild-type (wt) and mutated SRC1 coactivator showing the locations of the four LXXLL motifs. (B) The SRC1-4 motif is required to potentiate MR-mediated transcription. 50 ng Gal4-MR LBD was cotransfected with pG5Luc and an increasing amount (ng) of SRC1 wt and 3 LXXAA mutant forms for LXXLL motifs. The cells were treated with and without 10 nM corticosterone. The dashed line indicates the basal level of activation without exogenous SRC1. (C) Mammalian two-hybrid interaction of SRC1 with MR. GAL4-DBD was fused with the SRC1-4 motif (SRC1-4, residues 1240–1441) and two mutated forms of SRC1-4 (SRC1-4 [E1441K], corresponding to E+7K mutation of the SRC1-4 motif, and SRC1-M4 [L1438A/L1439A], corresponding to the LXXAA mutation of the SRC1-4 motif), respectively. VP16 was fused with MR LBD and MR LBD (K782E). The cells were cotransfected with GAL4 and VP16 fusion constructs and pG5Luc reporter. The cells were treated with 10 nM corticosterone. (D) Binding of various peptides to the purified MR LBD (C808S) with wt charge clamps or mutated charge clamps in the presence of corticosterone (100 nM) as measured by AlphaScreen assays. K785E and E796R, first charge clamp mutations; K791E and E796R, second charge clamp mutations. The results in (B)–(D) are the average of three experiments, with error bars showing SDs. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 367-380DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Recognition of Corticosterone by MR and Ligand Binding Specificity of GR and MR (A) A 2Fo − Fc electron density map (2.2 σ) showing the bound corticosterone and the surrounding MR residues. (B) Schematic representation of MR-corticosterone interactions. Hydrophobic interactions are indicated by dashed lines, and hydrogen bonds are indicated by arrows from proton donors to acceptors. Residues that make polar and nonpolar interactions with ligands are colored in blue and white, respectively. (C and D) Overlays of the MR/corticosterone structure with the GR/dexmethasone structure, where MR is in light green and GR is in dark green. The key residues that determine MR and GR selectivity are noted, with MR ligand binding pocket shown in red surface and GR ligand binding pocket shown in blue surface. MR residues are labeled in red and GR in blue. The arrows indicate the relative shift of the MR residues S843 and L848 with the corresponding GR residues P637 and Q642. (E–H) Effects of mutations of key residues on hormone specificity between MR and GR. Dose-response curves for induction of luciferase activity by MR, MRL848Q, MRL848Q/S843P (E and F), GR, GRQ642L, and GRQ642L/P637S (G and H) in response to cortisol and corticosterone, respectively. The estimated EC50 values are shown with dotted lines. The results are the average of three experiments, with error bars showing SDs. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 367-380DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Molecular Basis for the Specificity of Steroid Hormones (A) Chemical structures of the steroid hormones. The numbering of the rings and key atoms are noted. (B) Summary of structural comparison steroid hormone receptors, including the pocket sizes, sequence homology (percentage of identity in the LBDs), and the rmsd values of the Cα atoms of the core LBD when MR was super positioned with GR, PR, AR, and ER, respectively. (C and D) An overlapping comparison of the MR structure (light green) with the structure of AR (C) and PR (D), where the hormones are shown in stick and ball and AR/PR are shown in dark green. The key residues that determine hormone selectivity are noted, with MR ligand binding pocket shown in red surface and AR and PR ligand binding pocket shown in blue surface. MR residues are labeled in red and AR and PR in blue. Molecular Cell 2005 19, 367-380DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.026) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions