Beyond Induced-Fit Receptor-Ligand Interactions: Structural Changes that Can Significantly Extend Bond Lifetimes  Lina M. Nilsson, Wendy E. Thomas, Evgeni.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Not Just an Oil Slick: How the Energetics of Protein-Membrane Interactions Impacts the Function and Organization of Transmembrane Proteins  Sayan Mondal,
Advertisements

Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between Staphylococcal Virulence Factor Sbi-IV and Complement C3d  Ronald D. Gorham, Wilson Rodriguez, Dimitrios.
David Craig, Mu Gao, Klaus Schulten, Viola Vogel  Structure 
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Energetic Pathway Sampling in a Protein Interaction Domain
Steered Molecular Dynamics Studies of Titin I1 Domain Unfolding
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Mechanical Strength of the Titin Z1Z2-Telethonin Complex
Interactions of Pleckstrin Homology Domains with Membranes: Adding Back the Bilayer via High-Throughput Molecular Dynamics  Eiji Yamamoto, Antreas C.
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Onset of Anthrax Toxin Pore Formation
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
Importin-β: Structural and Dynamic Determinants of a Molecular Spring
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Dániel Szöllősi, Gergely Szakács, Peter Chiba, Thomas Stockner 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
The Signaling Pathway of Rhodopsin
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Sequential Unfolding of Individual Helices of Bacterioopsin Observed in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Extraction from the Purple Membrane  Michele.
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Gating of HCN Channels by Cyclic Nucleotides: Residue Contacts that Underlie Ligand Binding, Selectivity, and Efficacy  Lei Zhou, Steven A. Siegelbaum 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
David Craig, Mu Gao, Klaus Schulten, Viola Vogel  Structure 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Mehrdad Mehrbod, Stephen Trisno, Mohammad R.K. Mofrad 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Y. Zenmei Ohkubo, Emad Tajkhorshid  Structure 
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Beyond Induced-Fit Receptor-Ligand Interactions: Structural Changes that Can Significantly Extend Bond Lifetimes  Lina M. Nilsson, Wendy E. Thomas, Evgeni V. Sokurenko, Viola Vogel  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages 1047-1058 (July 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Mannose Binding Pocket of FinH's Lectin Domain, FimH-L (A) The roughly 5 nm long FimH-L molecule bound to methyl-mannose (αMM). (B) Close-up of αMM in the base of the binding pocket. In both (A) and (B), αMM and FimH residues that have been proposed to H-bond with the mannose ring are highlighted and color coded. (C) The lifetime of FimH:αMM H-bonds during equilibrium simulation. Each bar indicates duration for which the H-bond distance is within 2.8 Å (heavy atoms). Increases above this cutoff lasting less than 3 ps are not resolved in the image. (D) The interaction energy (including van der Waals interactions, electrostatic interactions, and H-bonding) between αMM and key FimH-L residues during equilibrium simulation. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Force-Induced Transition between Two FimH-L:αMM Conformations Followed by Bond Rupture, Giving Rise to Unbinding (A) Force-pulling geometry and initial setup. Constant force is applied to the Cα atom of C-terminal Thr158 of FimH-L and also to the methyl group carbon of αMM (cyan atoms). Phe1 (magenta), Asp54 (orange), and Thr158 (brown) are highlighted along with αMM (yellow). The FimH-L is shown in white. (B) Snapshots, followed by a time sequence, of the initial αMMparallel orientation (blue) and the final predissociation αMMperpendicular orientation (red), and also unbound αMM immediately following dissociation (transparent red) in a 200 pN constant force simulation. The backbones of Phe1 and Asp54 have been aligned for clarity. (C) The noncovalent FimH:αMM interaction energy for two representative 200 pN unbinding trajectories. αMM is shown schematically as hexagon, highlighting the parallel and perpendicular orientations. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Number of Water Attacks on Force-Bearing H-Bonds during the Force-Induced Transition between the Two FimH-L:αMM Conformations (A) The Phe1:αMM and Phe1:Asp54 distances during 200 pN constant force pulls. As an H-bond forms spontaneously between Phe1 and Asp54, an H-bond between Phe1 and αMM breaks immediately, and αMM transitions from αMMparallel to αMMperpendicular. (B–D) The corresponding frequency of water attacks on the H-bonds between Phe1 and αMM, and between Asp54 and αMM, when the complex is subjected to a tensile fore of 200 pN. A second representative 200 pN pull is also shown, with (C) key distances (as in [A] and [D]) and water attacks (as in [B]). Water attacks are defined as the number of water molecules within 3 Å of the atoms mediating H-bonds between αMM and FimH residues 1 and 54 for each 10 ps time step. αMMparallel and αMMperpendicular are indicated schematically as hexagons. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Pocket Fluctuates between Two Conformational States in the Absence of Mannose but Not When the Complex FimHwide:αMMparallel Has Formed (A–C) FimHwide:αMMparallel and (D–E) FimH without mannose. (A and D) The Phe1:Asp54 (gray) and the Phe1:αMM (black) separation. (B and E) Snapshots of the starting (blue) and 1.4–1.5 ns (red) structures. The backbones of Phe1 and Asp54 have been aligned for clarity, and key H-bonds have been highlighted (dashed lines). The distance between the H-bond partners Phe1.N and Asp54.OD2 is indicated. (C) Conceptual model of a simplified energy landscape showing the barrier separating the FimHwide:αMMparallel (right side; occupied) and FimHnarrow:αMMperpendicular (left side; empty) conformations. Asp54 (orange), Phe1 (purple), and αMM (yellow) are indicated schematically. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mannose Orientation Regulates FimH Pocket Conformation (A) Equilibration of αMMperpendicular aligned into FimHwide. (C) Equilibration of αMMparallel aligned into a FimHnarrow. In each simulation (A and C), the original distance between αMM.O2 and Phe1.N was restrained. (B and D) Conceptual model of a simplified energy landscape showing the barrier separating the FimH:mannose complex conformations, illustrating how the starting complexes settle into stable configurations within the simulation time. Asp54 (orange), Phe1 (purple), and αMM (yellow) are indicated schematically. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of FimHwide on Mannose Ring Orientation αMMperpendicular was manually aligned into FimHwide. In subsequent equilibrations, residues Phe1 and Asp54 were either (B–D) forced to stay in the extended position, or (E–G) simulated without any restraints. (B, E, and H) The Phe1:Asp54 (gray lines) and Phe1:αMM separation distances (black lines). Snapshots of the (A) starting and (C, F, and I) ending structures. In all structures, the backbones of residues 1 and 54 have been aligned for clarity, and key H-bonds have been highlighted (dashed lines). (D and G) Conceptual model of a simplified energy landscape showing the barrier separating the two FimH-mannose complex conformations, illustrating how the starting complexes settle into various stable configurations within the simulation time. Rigidification of the base of the binding pocket to approximately 5.1 Å, allowing for stereochemical matching between FimH and αMM, lowers the energy well on the right (compare [D] and [G]; see Figure 7). Asp54 (orange), Phe1 (purple), and αMM (yellow) are indicated schematically. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Subangstrom Stereochemistry of Two Residues Deep in the FimH Binding Site Regulates Binding Strength to Mannose (A) FimH:αMM lifetime for 400 pN constant force pulls, restraining the Phe1:Asp54 distance at the base of the pocket to values evenly spanning 3.4–6.4 Å, with each of the 17 conditions performed in at least duplicate. Controls: restraining (B) Asn135:Asp140 and (C) Asp54:Gln133 distances, with each condition performed in duplicate. (D) FimH:αMM lifetime for 200 pN constant-force pulls for three different setups: normal unrestrained pulls, as in Figure 2 (average of four simulations, FimHwide:αMMparallel, white bar); this same setup, but with the Phe1:Asp54 distance restrained in the FimHwide conformation (light gray); and starting from FimHnarrow: αMMperpendicular restrained in the FimHnarrow conformation (average of three simulations; dark gray). Error bars represent standard deviations of the repeated trials. Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Schematic of the Proposed Catch Bond Model (A and B) The binding strength of mannose is modulated by its orientation within the binding site of FimH, which, in turn, is affected by the geometry of residues 1 and 54 in the base of this binding site (and vice versa). In the simulations, unbound (mannose-free) FimH transitions back and forth between FimH-Lnarrow and FimH-Lwide within nanoseconds, as residues Phe1 (purple square) and Asp54 (orange square) can be either kept close together through an H-bond (dashed line) or separated, without an interresidue H-bond. While it cannot be derived from MD and SMD whether mannose has a higher probability of initially binding to one or the other of these states, the experimentally observed existence of two states with two different lifetimes can be explained if mannose initially predominantly binds to FimH via a short-lived state (Nilsson et al., 2006; Thomas et al., 2002, 2004, 2006). Initial binding of mannose (yellow diamond) likely occurs optimally to FimHnarrow, with the mannose ring standing up in the pocket (αMMperpendicular) through a weak interaction sustained mainly through H-bonds to Asp54 (FimHnarrow:αMMperpendicular). Upon binding of mannose, however, Phe1–Asp54 can also separate (FimHwide), at which time the mannose ring sits down in the pocket (αMMparallel) and directly interacts with Phe1, in addition to Asp54 (FimHwide:αMMparallel). Finally, the allosteric changes proposed to result from the application of tensile force across the FimH:αMM complex may regulate the subangstrom spatial tuning of the complex, such as the interresidue Phe1:Asp54 distance, and further favor the strong-binding FimHwide conformation over the weak-binding FimHnarrow conformation. If the rigidity of the FimH pocket increases, the FimH:αMM bond lifetime is increased as a stabilized strong-binding state is formed (FimHwide:αMMparallel, increased rigidity). Structure 2008 16, 1047-1058DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.03.012) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions