Geert Jan Groeneveld, MD, PhD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Dose Response Clinical Trials
Advertisements

Matthew M. Riggs, Ph.D. metrum research group LLC
Inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies: Results of a Phase 0 Trial Shivaani Kummar, MD National.
Marc Bailie DVM, PhD Director In Vivo Facility Michigan State University, Chief Development Officer Integrated Nonclinical Development Solutions (INDS)
Drug Research and Development (R&D) Karol Godwin DVM.
A daily dose of 400 mg efavirenz (EFV) is non-inferior to the standard 600 mg dose: week 48 data from the ENCORE1 study, a randomised, double-blind, placebo.
Clinical Trials Importance in future therapies. What are the Requirements to Produce New Drugs? Drug must work significantly better than a control treatment.
JMV 1843 pharmacological profile
Title, in bold style Subtitle, in regular Max 3 lines of text totally NB! The graphic outside the slide will not show in “Slide Show” or on print WntResearch.
Pharmaceutical Development and Review Process Rev. 10/21/2014 APGO Interaction with Industry: A Medical Student Guide.
Methylphenidate Transdermal Patch Paul J. Andreason, MD Acting Deputy Director Division of Psychiatry Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
+ Drug Development and Review Process. + Objectives Learn the processes involved in drug discovery and development Define the phases involved in FDA drug.
NMF 3/6/03 Susan Galbraith, MB BChir PhD Vice President Clinical Discovery Oncology & Immunology Phase 0 Trials Why aren’t they more widely used by industry?
Food and Drug Administration Preclinical safety data for “first in human” (FIH) clinical trials in healthy volunteer subjects Oncology Drug Advisory Committee.
INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG SERVICES IN THE HOSPITAL Sheree Miller, Pharm.D. University of Washington Medical Center
Stages of drug development
Office of Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics IDSA/ISAP/FDA Workshop 4/16/04 1 Improvement in Dose Selection: FDA Perspective IDSA/ISAP/FDA Workshop.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Obtaining and Negotiatiing a Position in Industry/Biotech Roy G. Smith Ph.D. Director, Huffington Center on Aging Professor, Department of Molecular and.
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
2010 ASENT Conference March Highlights A novel mechanism of action and a new class of therapy in a large marketplace where existing mechanisms leave.
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
Phase 1 Clinical Studies First-In-Human (FIH) Pharmacologically-Guided Dose Escalation Jerry M. Collins, Ph.D. Developmental Therapeutics Program Division.
DRUG DEVELOPMENT & REGULATIONS DR ARIF HASHMI. DRUG DEVELOPMENT Discovery and synthesis Preclinical development (chemical testing, biological testing,
Nonclinical Perspective on Initiating Phase 1 Studies for Small Molecular Weight Compounds John K. Leighton, PH.D., DABT Supervisory Pharmacologist Division.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
ONCOLOGY Drug Development Fadi Sami Farhat, MD ONCOLOGY Drug Development Fadi Sami Farhat, MD Hematology Oncology
Concepts and Applications of Pharmacokinetics
RESEARCH Lymphatic Targeting of Tenofovir; Intracellular Pharmacokinetics and Viral Dynamics Arnold Fridland, Ph.D, William Lee, Ph.D. Gilead Sciences,
APPLYING PRE-CLINICAL DATA TO CLINICAL STUDIES-I Edward A. Sausville, M.D., Ph.D. Developmental Therapeutics Program National Cancer Institute October.
Background Objectives Data Simulation in human Conclusion -F14512, a polyamine-vectorized anti-cancer drug which combines an epipodophyllotoxin core targeting.
Preclinical Guidelines: Development of Radioprotective/Mitigative Agents Departments of Dermatology & Radiation Oncology University of Rochester Medical.
INJECTAFER Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) Christy S. John, Ph.D Division of Clinical Pharmacology V Office of Clinical Pharmacology Division.
1-Compartment Oral Dosing 400 mg of moxifloxacin is administered orally to Mr BB, a 68 yr old male who weighs 75 kg. Blood samples were drawn following.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
CHEE 4401 Definitions drug - any substance that affects the structure or functioning of an organism pharmaceutics - the area of study concerned with the.
Novel Neurotherapeutic
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
C LINICAL R ESEARCH. CONTENTS Drug Development Process Pre – Clinical Studies Clinical Trials Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV 2.
“Journey of a Drug” From Test Tube TO Prescribing Physician.
Improvement in Dose Selection Through Clinical PK/PD in Antimicrobial Drug Development: Perspective of an Industry PK/PD Scientist Gregory A. Winchell,
Clinical Trials - PHASE II. Introduction  Important part of drug discovery process  Why important??  Therapeutic exploratory trial  First time in.
The process of drug development. Drug development 0,8 – 1 mld. USD.
Source: Frank M. Balis Concentration and Effect vs. Time Conc./ Amount Effect [% of E MAX ] Time Central Compartment Peripheral Compartment Effect Compartment.
Dose Selection in Pharmaceutical Development Eliseo Salinas, MD, MSc Chief Scientific Officer Shire Pharmaceuticals.
Drug Development Process Stages involved in Regulating Drugs
Nuplazid™ - Pimavanserin
The Stages of a Clinical Trial
Figure 1: Mean comparative midazolam plasma concentration-time plot
University of Virginia Licensing & Ventures Group BIO 2016
Drug Discovery &Development
Regulatory– Terms & Definitions רגולציה - מונחים והגדרות
An APC activator (IMP321 or LAG-3Ig) combined with anti-PD-1 blockade
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
…driving discovery An improved potent direct thrombin inhibitor shows efficacy with low bleeding risk Anirban Datta et al.
Clinical Trials.
RAT SIMULATION RESULTS HUMAN SIMULATION RESULTS
Drug Development Stages
Histamine H1 receptor antagonist
Investment Opportunity and
TAK-715 p38MAPK inhibitor Summary
My typical day as a scientist in pre-clinical at AZ/MedI
AChE (Acetylcholinesterase) inhibitor
A Real World Application of the Scientific Method
Geert Jan Groeneveld, MD, PhD
Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology
Presentation transcript:

Geert Jan Groeneveld, MD, PhD The Reef Biotech Ltd case – What really happened and take home messages Geert Jan Groeneveld, MD, PhD June 7, 2017 Castle Oud Poelgeest, Oegstgeest The Netherlands

Reef Biotech Ltd. was Xenome Ltd. RB3285 was actually Xen-2174

The rise and fall of a biotech company Both CEO & head drug development leave Xenome Two board members (investors) leave Xenome EU patent US patent Japan patent End of Xenome Ltd $ 1.25 m investment $ 1.25 m investment $ 10 m equity finance $ 6.25 m new funding $ 3.75 m new share issue $ 2.5 m new funding $ 6 m new funding $ 5 m new funding Xenome Ltd is founded Xenome is founded Ziconotide lincensed by FDA for US market Ziconotide lincensed by EMA/EC for EU market 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 Pre-clinical studies on Xen2174 (in vitro, rat and dog) Additional dog studies (required by FDA) Phase I trial HV, IT admin. pain tests & EEG Phase I/II trial oncology patients IT admin. 1st Phase II trial bunion surgery IT admin. 2nd Phase II trial bunion surgery IT admin. (n.d.) Phase I trial HV IV admin. The rise and fall of a biotech company Phase I HV IT admin. / EEG FDA/CDER IND approval for Xen2174 FDA puts 1st Phase II on hold

hypothetical concentration in CSF in case of immediate and homogeneous distribution of intrathecally injected dose Cmax (mg/L) AUC (ng*h/ml)   CNS effects in CSF in plasma In vitro rat dog human (0,26 mg/L) EC50h 183nM 0,6 μg/kg i.t. EC50 human NET in vitro (0,30 mg/L) EC50r 214nM 0.08 μg i.t. EC50 rat NET in vitro (2.4 mg/L) 0.64 μg i.t. ED50 for anti-nociception in Brennan model for post-operative pain (3.1 mg/L) 0.84 μg i.t. ED50 for anti-allodynia effect in CCI model for tactile allodynia (3,2 mg/L) IC50r 2,57μM 0.86 μg i.t. IC50 rat NET in vitro (3,6 mg/L) IC50h 2,26μM 7,7 μg/kg i.t. IC50 human NET in vitro (4.7 mg/L) 0.068 mg/L 93.6 10 μg/kg i.t. PK-study 26 mg/L 0.097 mg/L 1 mg/animal i.t. (23.3 mg/L) 0.345 mg/L 516.2 50 μg/kg i.t. (33.7 mg/L) 9.1 μg i.t. anti-allodynia effect plateaued at this level in Chung model for peripheral neuropathic pain (37.0 mg/L) 10 μg i.t. plateau of post-operative nociception in Brennan model (46.7 mg/L) 0.597 mg/L 855.8 100 μg/kg i.t. (76.9 mg/L) 0.12-0.15 mg/kg i.t. no adverse effects observed (NOAEL for single i.t. administration) (84.4 mg/L) 22.8 μg i.t. ED50 for combined anti-nociception and anti-allodynia in CCI model (93.4 mg/L) 1.58 mg/L 2152 200 μg/kg i.t. (133 mg/L) 20 mg/subject safe and well-tolerated in at least 3 subjects (156.3 mg/L) 42.2 μg i.t. anti-allodynia observed for up to 48 hours in CCI model (154 mg/L) 2 mg/animal i.t. seizures in 1 dog (in cohort of n=10) 257 mg/L 0.13 mg/L (200 mg/L) 30 mg/subject safe and well-tolerated in at least 4 subjects (308 mg/L) 4 mg/animal i.t. seizures in 2 dogs (in cohort of n=10) 514 mg/L 0.243 mg/L (333 mg/L) 0.3 mg/kg i.t. (267 mg/L) 40 mg/subject aseptic drug-induced meningitis (1 subject in 6 subjects dosed) seizure (1 subject in 6 subjects dosed) (370 mg/L) 100 μg/day i.t. no effects on rotarod performance (385 mg/L) 5 mg/animal/day i.t. for 14 days seizure in 1 dog (in cohort of n=3) (615 mg/L) dose up to 8 mg/animal i.t. no seizures and no effects on EEG in Beagle dogs 1445 mg/L 0.797 mg/L 8 mg/animal i.t. (741 mg/L) 0.2 mg/animal/day "significant mortality" (769 mg/L) 10 mg/animal/day i.t. for 14 days (1154 mg/L) 15 mg/animal/day i.t. no effects on Functional Observational Battery (1481 mg/L) 400 μg/day i.t. seizures (2230 mg/L) 29 mg/animal i.t. upper motor neuronal deficits and seizures (3076 mg/L) 40 mg/animal i.t. death

Study design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, serial-cohort, single ascending dose of Xen2174 or placebo PK/PD study, administered intrathecally in HV Pharmacokinetics: CSF PK up to 32 hours (via intrathecal catheter) Plasma PK Pharmacodynamics: Pain threshold and tolerance levels for each of a battery of nociceptive tests Safety 24h EEG Cohort Xen2174 dose Placebo 1 0.50 mg (n=8) n=3 2 1.00 mg (n=8) 3 2.50 mg (n=8) n=2

PainCart; multidimensional pain test battery Electrical Stimulation Olofsen and Dahan, 2005 Arendt-Nielsen et al., 2007 Pneumatic Pressure Polianskis, 2001 Cold Pressor Eckhardt et al. 1998 and Jones et al. 1988 Conditioned Pain Modulation DNIC Electrical pre/post cold pressor Thermal stimulation Medoc TSA-II 30Thermode CHEPS UVB model Capsaicin (chemical allodynia model)

PD results: electrical stair PTT

PD results: cold pressor PTT

PD results: pressure PTT

PD results: Electrical burst PTT

PK results CSF concentration–time profiles of Xen 2174

Safety issues human equivalent doses of Xen-2174

CSF concentrations humans vs dogs

Out-of-pocket costs Xenome Ltd. 1998-2013 Study phase Costs preclinical $ 2,000.000 Discovery and pharmacology GLP preclinical $ 4,500.000 Toxicology and PK clinical $ 10,500.000 $ 975.000 Phase I study in HV: plasma PK and safety Phase I/II study in cancer patients with pain Phase II study in 200 bunionectomy patients Phase I study in HV with EEG recording (no CSF PK!) Phase I PK/PD study in HV; CSF PK and pain tests Total $ 16,975.000

Take home messages Fail early to fail cheap QBCD: which question needs to be answered first? More (quality) information early on leads to better informed decisions MTD is not (that) relevant for non-cytotoxic drugs Allometric scaling leads to estimates that still have to be confirmed