Presented by Alexandre Maltas Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis Koolaard – A. General introduction on Doping B. General introduction on the WADC C. System of the WADC 2.
Advertisements

What a FIBA Agent should know about Anti-Doping
Chiropractic Assistant Regulation in Arizona Craig S. Seitz, D.C. Board Chairman.
World Anti-Doping Code Designed to meet the challenges of its day Association of National Olympic Committees Sir Craig Reedie, WADA President 7 November.
National implementation of REMIT Henrik Nygaard, Wholesale and transmission (DERA)
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
The new Germany/UK Treaty - The German Perspective IFA Trilateral Meeting 3 November 2010 Jan Brinkmann.
A TRAINER, IN THE ABSENCE OF SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY, IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDITION OF EACH HORSE HE ENTERS IN A RACE. A TRAINER SHALL.
1 Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January.
1 Exemption Administration Training Prepared by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board Audit Committee Prepared January, 2011.
CHAPTERCHAPTER McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Acceptance THREETHREE.
Discipline and Dismissals Lecture 15
World Anti-Doping Code Process and Content Copenhagen, 13 November 2002.
Understanding decision making - Prosecuting complaints Karen Mobbs Director of Proceedings Health Care Complaints Commission Patrick Griffin Barrister.
Overview of the Irish Anti-Doping Programme. WADA 2015 Code What you need to know.
The Faculty Athletics Committee Annual Report November 15, 2013.
Nuclearsafety.gc.ca Joint Congress on Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences May 28, 2015 e-Doc CNSC Administrative Monetary Penalties Overview.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
1 OCA Anti-Doping Rules Mohammad Reza, SHARIF, MD Member of OCA Anti-Doping Commission
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Anti-Doping Update WADA Code 2015 Significant Changes Enforced January
Tad and Terry Legal Issues in ILP. 28 CFR Part 23 The federal rule that governs or provides guidance for these issues. § 23.3 Applicability: These policy.
Statements and Confessions
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Muston planning for Bath & North East Somerset Council 3 June 2015 Councillor Training – Planning Mike Muston – Muston Planning muston planning.
The Award can be refused if the respondent can prove the irregularity in the composition of the Arbitral Tribunal or Arbitral Procedure.
Rahandusministeerium Adopting, Implementing, and Enforcing the Aquis Communautaire Relating to Auditing – Lessons Learned Veiko Tali
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
Common Law “…teachers must be given sufficient latitude in control of conduct of a school for an appropriate decorum and learning atmosphere to prevail”
Court Cases and Dispute Resolution on Tax Matters
Sutton Public Schools Anti-Bullying Law Overview
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application
Rules of criminal law and theory in criminal law
An Introduction to Assurance and Financial Statement Auditing
Situation Analysis Access to Court Decisions in Georgia
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
Fees Briefing Paper Chishala Kateka, IESBA Member and Fees Working Group Chair IESBA Meeting March 13-15, 2017.
HIPAA Administrative Simplification
CIPA Visit to ASPA 5 October 2016
IPR AND CONCENTRATIONS
Targeted Review of Qualifications: A Brief Primer
In Order To Believe USADA
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
Tax Compliance, the IRS, and Tax Authorities
BVI Business Companies Act Workshop
Welcome to Truman State University
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
IESBA Meeting Athens, Greece June, 2018
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
The New National Equine Anti-Doping and Controlled Medication System
Code 2021 Review: Important Considerations for NADOs
Updates to Expedited Review Procedures
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance Course
Member Meeting Year 5, Meeting 3 November 1-2, 2017
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Decision Making in the Context of the Administrative Sanctions Procedure A programme for Inquiry Members of the Financial Service Regulatory Authority.
Growth in Recent years is due to:
Arbitration Proceedings II
Fines, Sanctions and Compensation The teeth in the GDPR & Data Protection Act 2018 by Simon McGarr, CIPP/E Data Compliance Europe.
Chairman Christi Craddick
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE GROUNDS FOR DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY AND SANCTIONS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS:
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINTS ADMISSIBILITY AND OPINIONS.
Exemption AdministrationTraining Related to Accepting Certificates
IESBA Meeting Nashville June 17-19, 2019
Ontario Racing Commission March 11, 2007
SAIPA COMMENTS DRAFT TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL AND TAX ADMINISTRATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Presented by Alexandre Maltas Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation Overview of 2015 WADA Code Presented by Alexandre Maltas Whitelaw Twining Law Corporation

Introduction 2015 WADA Code came into force January 1, 2015 Introduced significant changes from 2009 WADA Code Key themes to 2015 Code include: Longer sanctions for intentional conduct Increased flexibility in certain circumstances Greater emphasis on intelligence

Today’s Agenda 4 year sanction for intentional anti-doping rule violations “Contaminated Products” rule Credit for Substantial Assistance Prompt Admissions vs. Timely Admissions Broader scope of activities prohibited during period of ineligibility

4 Year Sanction for Intentional Violations Most significant change Article 10.2.1 mandates a 4 year period of ineligibility for intentional anti-doping rule violations Replaces “aggravating circumstances” rules in 2009 Code, which were rarely used

Intentionality Article 10.2.3 states that “intentional” is meant to identify athletes who cheat Requires that the athlete: Knew their activity constituted an anti-doping rule violation OR Knew that there was a significant risk that the conduct might result in a violation and manifestly disregarded that risk Early decisions suggest that the Athlete must do much more than simply assert that the violation was not intentional and that all facts and circumstances must be carefully examined (Youssef)

Burden of Proof Depends on Substance in Question Rule 10.2.1.1 – for violations that DO NOT involve a Specified Substance, 4 year sanction unless the Athlete can establish that a violation was not intentional Rule 10.2.1.1 – for violations that involve a Specified Substance, 4 year sanction only if Anti-Doping Organization can establish that the violation was intentional

Article 10.2.1 – CCES v Youssef Athlete must establish on a balance of probabilities how prohibited substance entered his system to disprove intentionality and Athlete must prove that he or she did not intentionally or recklessly take the prohibited substance Follows approach taken in UK in Songhurst and Graham

Contaminated Products Article 10.5.1.2 – where athletes can establish no significant fault AND prohibited substance came from a Contaminated Product, sanction can range from reprimand to 2 years depending on degree of fault Contaminated Product is “a product that contains a prohibited substance that is not disclosed on the product label or in information available in a reasonable internet search” Two key changes: Additional threshold issue to access reduction in sanction Greater flexibility in range of sanctions

Substantial Assistance Article 10.6.1 provides that an Anti-Doping Organization may suspend up to ¾ of a period of ineligibility in exchange for substantial assistance Extent of reduction is based on significance of assistance and seriousness of athlete’s violation Article 10.6.1.2 provides for even greater relief, including no period of ineligibility in exceptional cases and on WADA’s agreement 2015 Code significantly increases incentive to provide assistance and recognizes that intelligence is key to effective anti-doping

Timely vs. Prompt Admissions Timely Admissions provisions remain – allows for period of ineligibility to start as early as date of sample collection (Article 10.9.2) Article 10.6.3 introduces Prompt Admissions Athlete subject to a 4 year sanction, by promptly admitting violation, may receive a reduction in sanction down to 2 years Analysis takes into account seriousness of violation and athlete’s degree of fault Requires approval of both WADA and Anti-Doping Organization

More Activities Prohibited During Period of Ineligibility Article 10.12.2 Prohibits participation in competitions or activities of a Signatory Cannot compete in a non-signatory professional league No administrative activities

Conclusions/Early Observations 4 year sanctions likely will result in more hearings Burden to disprove intentionality is high Greater scope to deal with violations pre-hearing in exchange for admissions and/or assistance Paper can be found at www.whitelawtwining.com

For more information, please visit our website Thank you For more information, please visit our website www.whitelawtwining.com