Evaluation Training September 4, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Agenda For Today! Welcome/Housekeeping
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
It’s All About Student Growth Objectives
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Student Growth Objective (SGO) Evaluating SGO Quality
WPSD Educator Effectiveness 102
Student Growth Objectives (SGO)
How to Write a Tiered SGO. For ALL students 1. What do we expect our students to learn? 2. How will we know they are learning? 3. How will we respond.
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Student Learning targets
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Teacher Evaluation System Part II: Student Learning Data May 5, 2015.
Information for school leaders and teachers regarding the process of creating Student Learning Targets. Student Learning targets.
MEASURES OF STUDENT OUTCOMES WPSD EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS 102.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
District In-Service October 14, The principal reason for releasing the 2013 edition of The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument was to respond.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Student Growth Objectives Unifying Standards, Instruction, and Assessment to Improve Student Learning June
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda: AchieveNJ Update ScIP Update 8.14 (+ Sharing with DEAC next meeting) Resources: Teacher Evaluation.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
Teacher Evaluation Mr. Dennis Ventrello Dr. Dori Alvich Bethanne Augsbach Caren Castaldo Jackie Winters Monroe Township Board of Education.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
Student Growth Objectives THE FIVE STEP PROCESS. Student Growth Objectives SGOs are long-term academic goals for groups of students set by teachers in.
SGO RESOURCES FOR LEADERS AND TEACHERS Office of Evaluation Division of Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Summer 2016.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Division of Academic Services/Special Programs SGO 2.1 Guidelines
Value-Added Calculation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Teacher SLTs
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Welcome to the NMTEACH Summative Report Webinar 2015
Teacher SLTs
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Teacher Evaluation Process
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Beg, Steal & Borrow A Highlight Reel (see sources on the final slide)
Overview of Title III Plan, Data, and Review of Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English (SDAIE) for K-12 Administrators Session 1 Local District.
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
TEM Growth and Achievement Measure Selection Process
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: AchieveNJ Updates Formal Observations
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Teacher SLTs
TeachNJ By Heather Perruso.
AchieveNJ Updates Franklin Lakes Public Schools
Teacher Evaluation Process
Leader SLTs
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Teacher SLTs
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Evaluation Information
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
Teacher Evaluation in BTSD (AchieveNJ)
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Teacher SLTs
Student Growth Measures
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Training September 4, 2018

Evaluation Components

Evaluation Components PDPs: One related to last year’s evaluations and summary / One related to district goal (Meeting the Needs of All Learners) All PDPs must be submitted through MLP by October 30, 2018.

There are many ways to meet the goal of the PDP in all four domains.

Evaluation Components Observations: Your assigned evaluators are in MLP. Teachers participating in the Video Observation Protocol for the first time must attend training. Details are in the After School PD Catalog. There are updated pre- and post-conference questions developed with last year’s DEAC team. You can view them on MLP.

Evaluation Components SGOs: Each teacher needs two SGOs; these will be submitted through MLP.

A Student Growth Objective is a long-term academic goal that teachers set for groups of students. It must be: Specific and measurable Focused on the right content and skills Aligned to state/national standards Based on available prior student learning data Based on growth and achievement Ambitious and feasible

Each teacher shall develop, in consultation with his or her supervisor or a principal’s designee, each student growth objective. If the teacher does not agree with the student growth objectives, the principal shall make the final determination. NJAC 6A:10-4.2(e)3

Quality Measurement Tools Assessments used to track progress on SGOs can include national standardized tests, statewide assessments, or common department assessments. Teachers can use measurement tools such as traditional tests, portfolio reviews, or performance assessments.

Starting Points Get to know your students from multiple sources of baseline data that may be quantitative, qualitative, or both.

Two kinds of SGOs: General SGOs measure the number of students who meet a target score on a single assessment. That target score is based on information you’ve gathered about the students. That target score has to be determined by the time a teacher submits an SGO--and teachers may have different target scores.

Two kinds of SGOs: Tiered SGOs also measure performance, but require a closer look at baseline data to determine tiered groups based on starting points.

Low 36/65 56% Medium 21/65 32% High 8/65 12% Preparedness Tiers determined by examining baseline data Preparedness Number of Students Percentage of Students Low 36/65 56% Medium 21/65 32% High 8/65 12% The preparedness groups here were developed by examining different areas of baseline data as shown in the starting points section. It is important to emphasize again that these groups are best developed when using multiple points of data and not just a pretest. This can and should include indicators of future success such as class participation, attendance, etc.

Preparedness Tier Exceptional 4 Full 3 Partial 2 Insufficient 1 Low 70 Target score on Final Assessment Objective Attainment Based on Percent (and Numbers) of Students Achieving Final Score Exceptional 4 Full 3 Partial 2 Insufficient 1 Low 70 >85% (31-36) 70-84% (25-30) 55-69% (18-24) <55% (0-17) Medium 80 >85% (19-21) 70-84% (15-18) 55-69% (11-14) <55% (0-10) High 90 >85% (8) 70-84% (6-7) 55-69% (4-5) <55% (0-3)

Reviewing the Results Low 70 31 Medium 80 16 High 90 4 Preparedness Group Target Score (%) Number of Students at Target Score Low 70 31 Medium 80 16 High 90 4 This chart shows the performance of students from the illustrative group on their final assessment.

Reviewing the Results Preparedness Group Target score on Final Assessment Objective Attainment Based on Percentage (and Numbers) of Students Achieving Final Score Exceptional 4 Full 3 Partial 2 Insufficient 1 Low 70 >85% (31-36) 70-84% (25-30) 55-69% (18-24) <55% (0-17) Medium 80 >85% (19-21) 70-84% (15-18) 55-69% (11-14) <55% (0-10) High 90 >85% (8) 70-84% (6-7) 55-69% (4-5) <55% (0-3) In this chart, the scores from the last slide have been transferred on to the scoring guide. The low group, which makes up 56% of the entire group, scored in the 4 range. The Medium Group scored in the 3 range, and the High group, which only makes up 12% of the class, scored in the 2 range.

Other PD Reminders: Visit staffapps.ebnet.org and sign up for other PD opportunities GCN Training #EBEdChat (every day this week and again Sept. 25 at 8PM) EB EdCamp: October 6 EB Nonfiction Book Club: you can register at staffapps under “curriculum”