Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Motor Regulation Results in Distal Forces that Bend Partially Disintegrated Chlamydomonas Axonemes into Circular Arcs  V. Mukundan, P. Sartori, V.F. Geyer,
Advertisements

F. Matthäus, M. Jagodič, J. Dobnikar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Fiona E. Müllner, Sheyum Syed, Paul R. Selvin, Fred J. Sigworth 
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Unsteady Motion, Finite Reynolds Numbers, and Wall Effect on Vorticella convallaria Contribute Contraction Force Greater than the Stokes Drag  Sangjin.
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Phase Transitions in Biological Systems with Many Components
Model Studies of the Dynamics of Bacterial Flagellar Motors
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Tamara C. Bidone, Haosu Tang, Dimitrios Vavylonis  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 96, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Instabilities in the Transient Response of Muscle
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Dietmar B. Oelz, Boris Y. Rubinstein, Alex Mogilner 
Hirokazu Tanimoto, Masaki Sano  Biophysical Journal 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Chromatin Hydrodynamics
Cell Traction Forces Direct Fibronectin Matrix Assembly
Taeyoon Kim, Margaret L. Gardel, Ed Munro  Biophysical Journal 
Ramana Dodla, Charles J. Wilson  Biophysical Journal 
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
V.P. Ivanova, I.M. Makarov, T.E. Schäffer, T. Heimburg 
Alexander J. Sodt, Richard W. Pastor  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Actin-Regulator Feedback Interactions during Endocytosis
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Comparative Studies of Microtubule Mechanics with Two Competing Models Suggest Functional Roles of Alternative Tubulin Lateral Interactions  Zhanghan.
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Thomas L. Daniel, Alan C. Trimble, P. Bryant Chase  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Jonathan E. Hiorns, Oliver E. Jensen, Bindi S. Brook 
R. Stehle, M. Krüger, G. Pfitzer  Biophysical Journal 
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Ave Minajeva, Michael Kulke, Julio M. Fernandez, Wolfgang A. Linke 
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Brownian Dynamics of Subunit Addition-Loss Kinetics and Thermodynamics in Linear Polymer Self-Assembly  Brian T. Castle, David J. Odde  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)
Stochastic Pacing Inhibits Spatially Discordant Cardiac Alternans
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Role of Ca2+ and Cross-Bridges in Skeletal Muscle Thin Filament Activation Probed with Ca2+ Sensitizers  Philip A. Wahr, Joseph M. Metzger  Biophysical.
Actin-Myosin Viscoelastic Flow in the Keratocyte Lamellipod
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Nicholas C. Darnton, Howard C. Berg  Biophysical Journal 
Enrique M. De La Cruz, Jean-Louis Martiel, Laurent Blanchoin 
Mechanotransduction Dynamics at the Cell-Matrix Interface
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
Actin Filament Strain Promotes Severing and Cofilin Dissociation
Contractile Fibers and Catch-Bond Clusters: a Biological Force Sensor?
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 258-266 (January 2010) Theoretical Predictions of the Effects of Force Transmission by Desmin on Intersarcomere Dynamics  Gretchen A. Meyer, Balázs Kiss, Samuel R. Ward, David L. Morgan, Miklós S.Z. Kellermayer, Richard L. Lieber  Biophysical Journal  Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 258-266 (January 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014 Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Graphical representation of the finite-element muscle fiber array. (B) Free body diagram of two sarcomeres linked at a Z-disk. Viscoelastic sarcomere elements are linked longitudinally at Z-disk nodes to form myofibrils and laterally by desmin elastic filaments (blue) to form a two-dimensional fiber. ECM (and sarcolemma composite) elements form the upper and lower bounds of the array, whereas tendon elements define each end. The location of each element is indexed by its row (i) and column (j). The array continues to extend in the direction of increasing i and j until it meets another ECM/tendon junction. The contractile element (CE), the series elastic element (SE), the parallel viscoelastic element (PVE), the sarcomere length (SL), and the series spring extension (E) are labeled in the bold sarcomere. Forces involved in the calculation of the nodal equations of motion are illustrated by color-coded arrows (red, active; blue, elastic; and green, viscous). The parameters used in the calculation of these forces are labeled near their associated arrows, with forces listed in capital letters and constants in lower case. Dotted arrows and associated variables label the directions of positive nodal displacement from the initial position. Parameters and nodal displacements are also indexed with subscripts by their location in the finite-element array in the (row, column) format. Sign conventions are set assuming that xi−1 < xi < xi+1. Variables xi,j and yi,j are the displacements at the x and y nodes, respectively. FE are the forces external to the sarcomeres pictured and Fi,j is the contractile force in the CE of sarcomere (i,j). PTi,j is the passive tension developed in the PVE and ci,j is the damping constant of the PVE of the same sarcomere. Constant si,j is the stiffness of the SE and ki,j is the stiffness of desmin. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Passive stress of myofibril elements and ECM elements, and the average passive stress in the simulated fiber superimposed on the sarcomere length-tension diagram. Myofibril passive stress, ECM passive stress, and the sarcomere length-tension relationship were estimated from work by others (6,13,15, 25–27). The fiber average passive stress is calculated for a simulated fiber with 10 myofibrils laterally by summing the force contribution of each myofibril and the two ECM elements and dividing by the total cross-sectional area. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sarcomere length distributions across the fiber length and depiction of initial passive tension (inset). The black trace is the sarcomere length distribution generated by Eq. 8, with a mean sarcomere length of 2.2 μm and a length range of 0.2 μm. The gray trace shows what happens to the distribution after passive stretch to a mean sarcomere length of 3 μm. The variation in sarcomere length is a result of the random variation in the passive tension coefficient, λ. (Inset) Passive tension curves for sarcomeres 1 and 100, where the curve for sarcomere 1 has been multiplied by a larger coefficient so that the passive tensions are equal for the two sarcomeres at their initial lengths (dots on inset). Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A) Mean Z-disk stagger as a function of sarcomere length over the course of a passive stretch. (B) Measurements of stagger at every 10th Z-disk over the length of the fiber at a sarcomere length of 5 μm. Data points are the mean value from 10 runs in each group, with a different random variation in the passive tension constant used for each run, and error bars are the standard deviations. Desmin null fibers have a significantly higher mean Z-disk stagger than wild-type at all sarcomere lengths >3 μm and at all Z-disks except for the fiber ends, which are constrained. Some error bars are small and are obscured by the data marker. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Length traces over time of a representative run for selected sarcomeres from wild-type (A) and desmin null (B) fibers and the overall normalized force traces (C) during simulated fiber fixed-end contraction. Solid lines correspond to wild-type simulations and dotted lines to desmin null. Sarcomere numbers are increasing along the length of the fiber, and each number is shown adjacent to the corresponding trace on the right side of the plot. This plot shows that end sarcomeres shorten significantly over the contraction period, whereas center sarcomeres lengthen more slowly and continuously. Note that end sarcomeres in the desmin null traces (B) are shorter than in the wild-type (A), and their corresponding force is lower (C). Compare with simulations reported previously (Figs. 4 A and 5 in Morgan et al. (9)). Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (A) Z-disk stagger as a function of the time course of simulated fixed-end contraction. (B) Measurements of stagger at every 10th Z-disk over the length of the fiber at 2.5 s. Mean Z-disk stagger is significantly higher for desmin null fibers than for wild-type at all time points and increases nonlinearly as a function of time. Z-disk stagger and hence differences in stagger between wild-type and desmin null fibers are small at the fiber ends due to the abrupt force drop modeled in the contractile element, with shortening beyond 1.68 μm sarcomere length and the limited opportunity for sarcomere length variations to add up to large staggers due to the proximity to the tendon. Z-disk staggers are on the same order as those seen during passive stretch. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Plot of the maximum fixed-end stress production during simulated fixed-end contraction of fibers with varying concentrations and localizations of desmin. Stress production is greater when desmin is preferentially localized to the fiber membrane (green) than when it is distributed randomly (blue) or preferentially localized away from the fiber membrane (black). Each data point represents the mean of 10 simulations under its color-coded condition, and error bars are standard deviations. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 258-266DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.014) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions