PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WORKSHOP OVERVIEW 1. MAJOR TROPICAL LAND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS RELATED TO HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES 2 (i). BEST METHODS (POLICY, TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES) TO ENHANCE.
Advertisements

Workshop on Climatic Analysis and Mapping for Agriculture
Standa Vaněček The potential of Integrated Modelling and the OpenMI Standa Vaněček DHI, Chairman of the OATC.
HarmoniRiB Workshop on Uncertainty, Brussels, September 21, HarmoniRiB Workshop on Uncertainty in Data and Models Brussels, September 21, 2006 Uncertainty.
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - Uncertainty issues - Michiel Blind, RWS-RIZA.
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
Final Conference June Maastricht, The Netherlands 1 Case Study: Kłodnica catchment, (Odra river basin) Poland Janusz Krupanek Institut for Ecology.
Development of lake Druksiai/Drisviaty Basin Management Program Feasibility study.
Approaches and Mainstreaming of Ecosystem-based Adaptation in Europe International workshop “Mainstreaming an ecosystem based approach to climate change.
Information and transboundary cooperation – challenges and responses Francesca Bernardini United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems - Water cycle and Soil-related aspects Improving Integrated Water Resources.
Add your Logo in the slide master menu GLOBAQUA Meeting, January 13th-14th, Freising IMPLICATIONS Module Reporting back Implications Module: WP8, WP9,
Conversion of river basin action plans into river basin management plans Conversion of river basin action plans into river basin management plans 9 th.
Assessment of the state of coasts in Europe – EEA activities and needs Andrus Meiner, European Environment Agency European Conference on Coastal Zone Research:
Seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia Countries (EECCA) on Water Statistics September 2012 Almaty, Kazakhstan The EU Water Framework.
Regulating Nitrate Pollution – European Approaches Helle Tegner Anker Faculty of Life Sciences Copenhagen University.
1 AGRICULTURAL POLLUTION REDUCTION ACTIVITY Financed by USAID APRA ROMANIA PROJECT Project implemented by: Assistance project for MAFWE International Resources.
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
Environmental policies in Europe
1 Queen Anne’s Gate, London
Rebecca Tharme Riverfutures Limited – UK
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
SCG Meeting Brussels, 9 February 2017
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
WG 2.B Integrated River Basin Management
CIS-Working Group on Climate Change and Water 20
BRIDGE WP5 Socio-Economic Assessment of Groundwater Threshold Values
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
LUCAS Task Force 30 September 2015 Item 4 – Update on the Knowledge Innovation Project on Accounting for Natural Capital and ecosystem services (KIP INCA)
State of play of French progress in cost-effectiveness analysis
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Integrated Risk Assessment and Management Wouter GEVAERTS Thomas TRACK Dietmar MÜLLER.
2. The Odense PRB Work Plan
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater ThrEsholds
The role of models in supporting river basin management
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
13th Meeting of the Working Group on Economic
Pilot River Basin Activity
What’s a WQIP and what can they achieve?
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
FLOODsite Integrated Project
Natural water Retention Measures
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Harmoni-CA initiative
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Working group Ecological Flows
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds: BRIDGE Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr) Groundwater Characterisation workshop, 25 June 2004.
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
Planning process in river basin management
BMW How the outcome may be utilized in the implementation of the WFD
Activity on WFD and Agriculture
NIVA - Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
“Water Science meets Policy” Event - 30th September – Brussels
European Commission activities
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
Jacques Delsalle, DG Environment, Unit D.1
2. The Article 5 provisional report
Water Science meets Policy Brussels 30 September 2010
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
Scientific Support to Policies
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Presentation transcript:

PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 Harmonised Techniques and Representative River Basin Data for Assessment and Use of Uncertainty Information in Integrated Water Management (HarmoniRiB) Jens Christian Refsgaard Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) The problem why do we need uncertainty assessments ? different needs at different steps in the modelling process (links to HarmoniQuA) Uncertainty assessment methodologies - HarmoniRiB Links to WFD implementation Example of elements in PRB case study PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 Problem statement #1 Uncertainty should affect the selection of appropriate modelling tool “We do not need complex hydrological models which we do not understand and where the output is known to be uncertain” “Instead we want simple models that are reliable” Statement from water manager responsible for implementation of Water Framework Directive (Harmoni-CA conference, Brussels February 2004)  Uncertainty assessments of model predictions both for simple and complex models essential for bridging the perception gap between scientists and practitioners PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

Consultant # 1 Consultant # 2 Problem statement #2 Uncertainty should affect water management decisions Copenhagen County project on identification of suitable methods for assessing groundwater vulnerability (2000) Assessments from five consultants on areas vulnerable to nitrate pollution from diffuse sources Consultant # 3 Consultant # 4 Different concpts of dominant processes that governed whether an area was vulnerable or not some based on DRASTIC some focussed on comprehensive flow and transport modelling others focussed a lot on geochemicl processes in order to evaluate the nitrate reduction potential in the catchment Consultant # 5 Vulnerable areas Very vulnerable Vulnerable Less vulnerable Well protected

State of knowledge about ‘reality’ (uncertainty concepts) Ignorance: unaware of imperfect knowledge State of knowledge about ‘reality’ (uncertainty concepts) Certainty (outcome known) ‘Bounded uncertainty’ (all possible outcomes known) ‘Unbounded uncertainty’ (not all outcomes known) No outcomes, “Do not know” Some outcomes and probabilities Some outcomes, No probabilities Ignorance No outcomes do not know = recognised ignorance All probabilities known Some probabilities known (rare) No probabilities known Quantitative Qualitative Scenarios Cannot formalise

Where and how does uncertainty come into the modelling process Harmonising Quality Assurance in model based catchment and river basin management (HarmoniQuA) HarmoniQuA - another CATCHMOD project dealing with quality assurance in the modelling process Modelling protocol with five main steps Uncertainty is handled differently at different steps in the modelling process

Problem framing, identification of uncertainty sources, water manager and stakeholder perceptions and priorities Dialogue between modeller and water manager/stakeholders Modeller reconsiders accuracy requirements (Comprehensive) uncertainty analyses

PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 Project objectives To establish a practical methodology and a set of tools for assessing and describing uncertainty originating from data and models To provide a conceptual model for data management and data base software that can handle uncertain data To establish well documented datasets (including uncertainty estimates) for eight river basins and make these data available for future research projects (’virtual laboratory’) To test the developed methodologies through a number of case studies focusing on integration of uncertainty and socio-economic aspects To disseminate the results among researchers and end users across Europe PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

HarmoniRiB - River basin network PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

Data being collected from river basins All data necessary to conduct research projects of relevance for implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive Time series meteorological data rivers (quantity, quality and ecology) lakes (quantity, quality and ecology) groundwater (quantity, quality and ecology) transitional and coastal waters (quantity, quality and ecology) Spatial data (GIS themes) land use pressures socio-economic data (water users) system characteristics PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 Data uncertainty Time x y Temporal data Spatial data “Guidelines for assessing data uncertainty” First draft version, September 2004 Final version, available on www.harmonirib.com, February 2005 PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 Uncertainty tools Data uncertainty Uncertainty propagation through models PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

Links to WFD implementation Mainly contribution to “Programme of measures” Database software for handling WFD type data, including information on data uncertainty Datasets from eight river basins - for use in future research projects on WFD related issues Methodologies and tools on uncertainty assessments tested on case studies example from Odense PRB PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

Fyns Amt Measure “WFD-scenario” Scenario on agricultural measures in 2000 Odense Fjord loading today (flow normalized): 63.000 59 Dkr/kgN 1060 1600 Total reduction and total costs Cost efficiency – average 19 38 3200 (4,6%) Catch-crops: Optimised use of existing catch-crops 7.175 287 25 50 2500 (3,6%) Organic farming - increased area - 29 57 1470 (2%) Reduction in cultivated area (urbanisation) 16.200 300 54 108 17% reduced livestock production (10000 LU pigs) 2.960 40 74 148 10% higher utilisation of N in all manure 1.302 14 93 185 5000 (7,1%) Catch-crops: Increased use on areas with manure 14.000 125 112 214 New forests on cultivated areas 11.600 400 4000 (5,7%) Wetlands in River-valleys 10.160 254 508 20% reduction on national N-fertilizer quota Cost + Cost eff. 1000 Dkr Dkr./kg N removed Reduced loading Odense Fjord Tonnes N Reduced Leaching Tonnes Nitrogen Area - ha (percent of agricultural area) Measure Fyns Amt “WFD-scenario” Scenario on agricultural measures in the catchment of Odense Fjord to meet environmental objectives Source: Danish Ministry for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries and Danish Forest and Nature Agency December 2003

Uncertanties on effects and uncertainties of costs PoM 1 Uncertain data Effects of… + = models effects 2 3 Difficult decision: 2 or 3? + = Costs of alternative programmes of measures Uncertain data models costs PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004

PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004 More information www.HarmoniRiB.com www.HarmoniQuA.org JCR@GEUS.DK PRB Workshop, Ghent, 4-5 October 2004