Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Spindle Position Is Coordinated with Cell-Cycle Progression through Establishment of Mitotic Exit-Activating and -Inhibitory Zones  Leon Y. Chan, Angelika.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
A Rac-cGMP Signaling Pathway
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Naomi R. Stevens, Hélio Roque, Jordan W. Raff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Cdk1 Phosphorylates Drosophila Sas-4 to Recruit Polo to Daughter Centrioles and Convert Them to Centrosomes  Zsofia A. Novak, Alan Wainman, Lisa Gartenmann,
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Libera Lo Presti, Sophie G. Martin  Current Biology 
SoxE Factors Function Equivalently during Neural Crest and Inner Ear Development and Their Activity Is Regulated by SUMOylation  Kimberly M. Taylor, Carole.
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
MAGE-RING Protein Complexes Comprise a Family of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Li Xu, Anthony Bretscher  Current Biology 
Max E. Douglas, Tim Davies, Nimesh Joseph, Masanori Mishima 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Shijiao Huang, Danming Tang, Yanzhuang Wang  Developmental Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (March 2014)
Polo Kinases Establish Links between Meiotic Chromosomes and Cytoskeletal Forces Essential for Homolog Pairing  Sara Labella, Alexander Woglar, Verena.
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
The Scaffold Protein Atg11 Recruits Fission Machinery to Drive Selective Mitochondria Degradation by Autophagy  Kai Mao, Ke Wang, Xu Liu, Daniel J. Klionsky 
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
The PAR-6 Polarity Protein Regulates Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis through p190 RhoGAP and the Rho GTPase  Huaye Zhang, Ian G. Macara  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
An E3-like Factor that Promotes SUMO Conjugation to the Yeast Septins
Takashi Hayashi, Gareth M. Thomas, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
PP2A Antagonizes Phosphorylation of Bazooka by PAR-1 to Control Apical-Basal Polarity in Dividing Embryonic Neuroblasts  Michael P. Krahn, Diane Egger-Adam,
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Tumor Suppressor PP2A Aβ Regulates the RalA GTPase
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Sophie G. Martin, W. Hayes McDonald, John R. Yates, Fred Chang 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 520-533 (March 2014) Release from Myosin V via Regulated Recruitment of an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Controls Organelle Localization  Richard G. Yau, Yutian Peng, Rajeshwari R. Valiathan, Shanda R. Birkeland, Thomas E. Wilson, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell  Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 520-533 (March 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 DMA1 Is Required for the Termination of Myo2-Dependent Transport (A) The vacuole accumulates at the mother-bud neck in the dma1Δ mutant (arrows); expression of DMA1 but not dma1-G232R restores the proper position of the vacuole in the bud. DIC, differential interference contrast. (B) Percentage of large-budded cells with the accumulation of vacuoles at the mother-bud neck in the absence of DMA1. Expression of DMA1 but not dma1-G232R restores the proper position of the bud vacuole in the dma1Δ mutant. Error bars show SEM. A minimum of 100 cells were counted per experiment for three experiments. (C) Vac17-GFP and vacuoles are mistargeted to the mother-bud neck in the dma1Δ mutant (arrow). WT, wild-type. (D) The vacuole colocalizes with Myo2-Venus at the mother-bud neck in the dma1Δ mutant (arrow). (E) Vac17 levels are elevated in the dma1Δ mutant; expression of DMA1 but not dma1-G232R rescues Vac17 levels. (F) Both peroxisomes (GFP-SKL) and vacuoles (FM4-64) are mistargeted to the mother-bud neck in large-budded cells in the dma1Δ dma2Δ mutant. Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dma1 Localizes to the SPBs, Septin Ring, and the Vacuole (A and B) In large-budded cells, Dma1-GFP localizes to regions consistent with the SPBs (A, arrowheads) and septin ring (A, <) and colocalizes with Spc42-mRFP, a component of the SPB (B, arrowheads). (C and D) In small-budded cells, Dma1-GFP localizes to the vacuole in the bud (C, arrow) and does not colocalize with Spc42-mRFP (D, arrowheads). (E) Dma1-3xGFP is first observed on the vacuole as the vacuole crosses the mother-bud neck. Dma1 remains on the vacuole at the bud tip until after the resolution of the segregation structure. (F) Percentage of cells with Dma1 at the vacuole in (i) unbudded cells, (ii) small-budded cells where the vacuole is in the mother, (iii) small-budded cells where the vacuole has crossed the mother-bud neck, (iv) small-budded cells where the vacuole has reached the bud tip, and (v) medium-budded cells where the segregation structure was resolved. (G and H) The myo2Δ dma1Δ double mutant coexpressing DMA1-GFP with MYO2 or myo2-D1297N. Dma1-GFP localizes to the vacuole in the bud in cells expressing MYO2 but fails to localize to the mother vacuole in cells expressing myo2-D1297N, a mutant defective in vacuole transport (G). Quantification of the percentage of small-budded cells where Dma1-GFP localizes to the vacuole (H). Z-sections of small-budded cells were analyzed. A minimum of 25 cells were counted per experiment for three experiments. Error bars show SEM. Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Identification of Vac17 Residues Required for the Termination of Vacuole Movement and Vac17 Turnover (A) Vac17 residues 204–250 comprise the PEST sequence (Tang et al., 2003). Red indicates potential phosphorylation sites required for Vac17 turnover, and blue indicates FHA binding motif. (B) Western blot analysis of vac17 point mutants from an alanine scan of all the serine and threonine residues within the Vac17 PEST sequence. The anti-Vac17 antibodies were used at a 1:1,000 dilution. (C) vac17-T240A-GFP and vac17-S222A-GFP as well as vacuoles are mistargeted to the mother-bud neck (arrows). Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Dma1 Binds Directly to Phosphorylated Vac17-Thr240 In Vitro (A) In the dma1Δ dma2Δ mutant, Vac17-GFP is stabilized (input). vac17-T240A-GFP levels are higher than Vac17-GFP and are not affected by the deletion of DMA1/DMA2. Vac17-GFP was immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibodies and analyzed using antibodies generated against a peptide with a phosphorylated Thr240 (anti-phospho-Thr240). These antibodies recognize Vac17-GFP but not vac17-T240A-GFP. (B) Model illustrating the hypothesis that in wild-type cells, Dma1 and Dma2 target phosphorylated Vac17 for degradation. This model predicts that phosphorylated Vac17 would accumulate in a dma1Δ dma2Δ mutant. (C) λ-phosphatase (ppase) dephosphorylates Vac17-GFP as indicated by an increase in electrophoretic mobility (arrow). Inhibition of λ-ppase activity blocks dephosphorylation. The anti-phospho-Thr240 antibody does not recognize dephosphorylated Vac17-GFP. (D) Immobilized recombinant GST-Dma1 binds Vac17-TAP but not vac17-T240A-TAP from cell lysates. GST-Myo2 cargo binding domain binds vac17-T240A-TAP that strongly suggests that vac17-T240A folds properly. (E) In a competition experiment, the phospho-Thr240 peptide blocked GST-Dma1 from binding Vac17-TAP, whereas a peptide with an unphosphorylated Thr240 or phospho-Ser222 did not block binding. The anti-phospho-Thr240 antibodies were used at a 1:2,500 dilution; anti-GFP antibodies, 1:1,000 dilution; and anti-TAP antibodies, 1:1,000 dilution. Staining was accomplished using GelCode Blue stain reagent (Thermo Scientific). (F) ThermoFluor was used to test the thermostability of GST and GST-Dma1. Heat-induced protein unfolding was measured as an increase in ANS fluorescence. The Tm of GST-Dma1 alone (red solid line), with an unphosphorylated peptide (blue solid line) or a phospho-Thr240 peptide (solid green line) was 32.02°C ± 0.08°C, 31.27°C ± 0.08°C, and 45.60°C ± 0.03°C, respectively. The Tm of the GST tag alone (black dotted line), with an unphosphorylated peptide (turquoise dotted line) or a phospho-Thr240 peptide (pink dotted line) was 56.24°C ± 0.06°C, 57.40°C ± 0.01°C, and 57.22°C ± 0.05°C, respectively. Error bars show SEM. See also Figure S4. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Dma1 Recruitment to the Myo2/Vac17 Vacuole Transport Complex Requires the Interaction between Dma1 and Vac17 (A) Dma1-GFP localizes to the vacuole at the bud tip (arrows) in cells expressing VAC17 and vac17-S222A but not vac17-T240A. (B) Quantification of the percentage of small-budded cells where Dma1-GFP is localized to the bud vacuole. A minimum of 30 cells were counted per experiment for three experiments. (C) Dma1-tdTomato colocalizes with Vac17-GFP and vac17-S222A-GFP but not with vac17-T240A-GFP. Colocalization occurs at the bud tip (arrows). (D) Quantification of the percentage of small-budded cells where Dma1-tdTomato colocalizes with GFP-tagged Vac17 and vac17 point mutants. A minimum of 13 cells were counted per experiment for three experiments. (E and F) In a myo2Δ vac17Δ double mutant, myo2-D1297N and VAC17-GFP or MYO2 and vac17-S222A-GFP were coexpressed from plasmids. In cells expressing myo2-D1297N, Vac17-GFP is localized throughout the mother vacuole. In cells expressing MYO2, vac17-S222A-GFP and the vacuole are transported to the bud (E). Vac17-GFP in the myo2-D1297N mutant and vac17-S222A-GFP in cells expressing MYO2 are phosphorylated at Thr240 to a similar extent (F). anti-phospho-Thr240 antibodies; 1:2,500 dilution. anti-GFP antibodies; 1:1,000 dilution. Error bars show SEM. Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dma1-Dependent Ubiquitylation Is Required for Vac17 Turnover and the Termination of Vacuole Movement (A) Expression of DMA1 and DMA1-GFP but not dma1-I329R-GFP rescues Vac17 levels in the dma1Δ mutant. (B and C) In the dma1-I329R mutant, the vacuole accumulates at the mother-bud neck of large-budded cells, with Vac17-GFP (B) and Myo2-Venus (C). (D) Recombinant GST-dma1-I329R binds Vac17-TAP in yeast cell lysates. (E) Vac17-GFP is ubiquitylated in vivo. Dma1 and Dma2 are required for Vac17-GFP ubiquitylation. (F) Vac17 levels are elevated in the uba1-2 E1 mutant and in proteasome mutants. The anti-GFP antibodies were 1:1,000 dilution; anti-Vac17 antibodies, 1:1000 dilution; anti-TAP antibodies, 1:1,000 dilution; and anti-myc antibodies, 1:2,000 dilution. Scale bars, 5 μm. See also Figure S6. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for the Regulation of Vacuole Transport (A) Vac17 localizes to the mother vacuole via binding Vac8. (B) Vac17 is phosphorylated at Thr240 as well as four Cdk1 sites. (C) Myo2 binds Vac17 and attaches to the vacuole in the mother cell to initiate transport. (D) After assembly of the Myo2/Vac17/Vac8 transport complex, Dma1 is recruited to the vacuole via binding directly to Vac17 at phospho-Thr240. (E) After resolution of the segregation structure that separates the bud and mother vacuoles, Dma1 ubiquitylates Vac17. (F) Proteasomal degradation of Vac17 detaches the vacuole from Myo2 and terminates vacuole transport. Developmental Cell 2014 28, 520-533DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2014.02.001) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions