Hui Yang, Dinshaw J. Patel  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Advertisements

Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 119, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Takuo Osawa, Hideko Inanaga, Chikara Sato, Tomoyuki Numata 
Daan C. Swarts, John van der Oost, Martin Jinek  Molecular Cell 
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
A Cas9–guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition
Structural Basis of Atg8 Activation by a Homodimeric E1, Atg7
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Hybrid Structure of the RagA/C-Ragulator mTORC1 Activation Complex
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Programmable RNA Cleavage and Recognition by a Natural CRISPR-Cas9 System from Neisseria meningitidis  Beth A. Rousseau, Zhonggang Hou, Max J. Gramelspacher,
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (June 2010)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e2 (July 2017)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Inhibition Mechanism of an Anti-CRISPR Suppressor AcrIIA4 Targeting SpyCas9  Hui Yang, Dinshaw J. Patel  Molecular Cell  Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 117-127.e5 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.024 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2017 67, 117-127.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.024) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 AcrIIA4 Directly Interacts with sgRNA-Bound SpyCas9 and Inactivates SpyCas9 (A) In vitro enzymatic assay monitoring cleavage of linear dsDNA by SpyCas9 and sgRNA in the presence of AcrIIA4. The molar ratios of AcrIIA4:SpyCas9 are shown at the top of each lanes (left). The inhibition between MBP-tagged SpyCas9 and AcrIIA4 is also detected and compared with dSpyCas9 (right). (B) AcrIIA4 selectively forms a stable complex with sgRNA-bound SpyCas9 rather than apo or DNA-bound SpyCas9-sgRNA in solution. SEC was performed using SpyCas9 in the presence or absence of sgRNA and sgRNA-dsDNA. (C) AcrIIA4 physically interacts with sgRNA-bound SpyCas9. MBP pull-down assays were performed using MBP-tagged AcrIIA4 and SpyCas9 in presence or absence of sgRNA and sgRNA-dsDNA. (D) Oligomeric state of AcrIIA4 in solution detected by SEC-MALS. The horizontal red line represents the SEC-MALS calculated mass for AcrIIA4. The calculated and theoretical molecular masses are 10.4 kDa and 10.2 kDa, respectively, indicating that AcrIIA4 exists as a monomer in solution. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 117-127.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.024) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Overall Structure of AcrIIA4-SpyCas9-sgRNA Complex (A) Domain organization of SpyCas9 and AcrIIA4. (B) Ribbon and surface representations of AcrIIA4-SpyCas9-sgRNA ternary complex, color coded as defined in (A). The AcrIIA4 molecule in each view is highlighted by a red circle. (C and D) Structural comparison of domain movement on proceeding from the SpyCas9-sgRNA binary complex to the SpyCas9-sgRNA-AcrIIA4 ternary complex (C) and to the SpyCas9-sgRNA-dsDNA ternary complex (D). Vector lengths correlate with the domain motion scales. TS and NTS represent target and non-target DNA strands, respectively. See also Figures S2 and S4. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 117-127.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.024) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detailed Interactions of AcrIIA4 with sgRNA-Bound SpyCas9 (A, C, and E) Surface views of the interfaces between AcrIIA4 and Topo domain (A), CTD domain (C), and RuvC domain (E). The interface segments are highlighted by black boxes. (B, D, and F) Detailed interactions at the interfaces between AcrIIA4 and Topo domain (B), CTD domain (D), and RuvC domain (F) are shown in stick representations. The color code is the same as Figure 2A. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are colored as black and red dashed lines, respectively. (G) Mutation analysis of AcrIIA4 residues involved in the binding to sgRNA-bound SpyCas9 by MBP pull-down assay of MBP-tagged AcrIIA4. (H) In vitro enzymatic assay of Ala mutations of AcrIIA4 residues that impaired or abolished binding of AcrIIA4 to sgRNA-bound SpyCas9. See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 117-127.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.024) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Inhibition Mechanism of SpyCas9 by AcrIIA4 (A and B) Recognition of AcrIIA4 (A) and the PAM duplex (B) by Topo, CTD, and RuvC domains of SpyCas9. The active site of RuvC domain for non-target DNA strand in each panel is highlighted by a yellow star. TS and NTS represent target and non-target DNA strands, respectively. (C) AcrIIA4 competitively binding to preformed SpyCas9-sgRNA binary complex (left) rather than SpyCas9-sgRNA-dsDNA ternary complex (right) in EMSA assays. The molar ratios of AcrIIA4:SpyCas9 are shown at the top of the gel. (D and E) Detailed interactions between AcrIIA4 (D) and PAM duplex (E) with the Topo and CTD domains of SpyCas9, respectively. (F and G) Recognition of key catalytic residues in the RuvC active site by AcrIIA4 (F) and non-target DNA strand (F). The modeled side chain of catalytic residue Asp10 is marked by asterisk. The position of cleavage site in non-target DNA strand is pointed by a black arrow. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2017 67, 117-127.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.024) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions