932 POLYPS RETRIEVED WHEN TRAP IS ATTACHED TO INSTRUMENT PORT ARE MORE FREQUENTLY INTACT AND INTERPRETABLE THAN WHEN REMOVED BY CONVENTIONAL METHOD

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Advertisements

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study Andreas Stang, MD, MPH, Thomas.

121 INJECTION-ASSISTED VERSUS UNDERWATER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION WITHOUT INJECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL LATERALLY SPREADING TUMORS: INTERIM.

Optical biopsy for colorectal polyps: moving along the S-shaped curve

Terry L. Jue, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Set higher adenomas per colonoscopy benchmark

610 SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENTS FOR TREATMENT OF BENIGN ANASTOMOTIC BILIARY STRICTURES IN LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENTS, ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT - FINAL 5 YEAR.

Sa1297 PREVALENCE AND PREDICTORS OF UNNECESSARY ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN THE TWO-STAGE ENDOSCOPIC STONE EXTRACTION FOLLOWED.

Su1388 IS EUS GUIDED LIVER BIOPSY READY FOR PRIME TIME? YES

Su1569 The Morphological Assessment of Large Sessile Polyps and Laterally Spreading Tumors of the Colon: An Educational Exercise Assessing Current Knowledge.

341 THE MAJORITY OF PATIENTS REMAIN STENT-FREE 5 YEARS AFTER TEMPORARY INDWELL OF A SINGLE FULLY COVERED SELF-EXPANDING METAL STENT FOR TREATMENT OF.

Sa1491 The Role of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the Management of Intrabiliary Rupture of Liver Hydatid Cysts (IBRH): Follow-Up.

Su1116 US VETERANS WITH PERSISTENT INDEFINITE FOR DYSPLASIA ARE AT INCREASED RISK OF DYSPLASTIC PROGRESSION Andrew J. Henn, Kevin Song, Amy Gravely,

939 GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS MODERATE CONSCIOUS SEDATION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON OUTCOMES WITH SELECTIVE SEDATION IN ERCP Ravi J. Patel, Eric M. Nelsen,

Sa1266 MAGNETIC ANCHOR-GUIDED ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION: TRAINING IN A PORCINE MODELO EX VIVO. Miguel A. Ramírez-Ramírez, Yolanda Zamorano-Orozco

Su1720 PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE HEMORRHOIDAL ENERGY TREATMENT PROCEDURE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BLEEDING INTERNAL HEMORRHOIDS Truptesh H. Kothari,

Su1690 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ADEQUATE BOWEL PREPARATION ON SUBSEQUENT COLONOSCOPY IN INPATIENTS WITH AN INADEQUATE INITIAL COLONOSCOPY Shashank Sarvepalli,

Sa1932 EFFICACY OF COMBINED TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION AND LAPAROSCOPIC HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR Kelly Wang, Farhaad Khan, Linda A. Hou, Sofiya.

Andres F. Carrion, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Quality improvement for the gastroenterology fellow

Sa1227 PREDICTIVE RISK MODEL FOR POST-ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION ULCER BLEEDING OF STOMACH: SINGLE CENTER COHORT STUDY Yeon Hwa Choe, Jun Chul.

Klaus Mergener, MD, PhD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Mo1717 HOW TO CREATE AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE FOR HNPCC (LYNCH SYNDROME) FROM EXISTING SOFTWARE PROGRAMS: MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER HNPCC SURVEILLANCE.

Sa1262 ENDOSCOPIC FEATURES OF PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GASTRIC CANCER Joao Guilherme Guerra,

237 EFFICACY OF ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF OBESITY: A META-ANALYSIS TO COMPARE ENDOSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTROPLASTY, ASPIRE ASSIST AND POSE

Sa1066 SCOPING THE SCOPE: ENDOSCOPIC EVALUATION OF ENDOSCOPE WORKING CHANNEL DAMAGE/DEBRIS USING A NOVEL FLEXIBLE INSPECTION SCOPE AND ASSESSMENT OF.

David G. Hewett, MBBS, MSc, PhD, FRACP Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

383 2-L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid Versus 4-L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Simethicone Lavage Solution for Colonoscopy Stefano Pontone, Rita.

537 RISK SCORE AND PREDICTORS FOR CONSCIOUS SEDATION FAILURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPY Josiah D. McCain, Fernando F. Stancampiano, Ernest P. Bouras,

Tu1046 A NOVEL DEVICE OF CONTINUOUSLY LIQUID-SUCKING CATHETER ATTACHMENT FOR THE ENDOSCOPE IN ESOPHAGEAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION: A SINGLE-BLIND,

Joshua P. Landreneau, Andrew T. Strong, Kevin M

Mohamad A. Eloubeidi, MD, MHS, FACP, FACG, FASGE

Su1419 A MULTI-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 336 EUS-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE CORE LIVER BIOPSY WITH A MODIFIED 1-PASS 1-ACTUATION WET SUCTION TECHNIQUE COMPARING.

Mo1382 EUS-Guided Needle-Based Confocal Laser Induced Endomicroscopy (nCLE): A Correlation Study of “Through the Needle” Imaging With Normal Histology.

Protein-losing enteropathy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Tu1898 UTILITY OF NEW CHOLANGIOSCOPES (SPYGLASS DS) IN BILIARY DISEASES: EXPERIENCE OF A SINGLE TERTIARY CARE CENTER Abed AlLehibi, Abdullah Almtawa,

611 COVERED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS FOR POST ORTHOTOPIC LIVER TRANSPLANT: IS 1-YEAR OF INDWELLING BETTER THAN 6 MONTHS? Silvia M. Reimão, Fernanda.

Sa1331 UNILATERAL VERSUS BILATERAL METAL STENTS FOR INOPERABLE MALIGNANT HILAR BILIARY STRICTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META- ANALYSIS Tariq A. Hammad,

Diagnosing pancreatic malignancy in the setting of chronic pancreatitis: is there room for improvement? James J. Farrell, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Sa1890 ROBOT-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION USING DISPOSABLE TIP-MOUNTED ROBOTIC MODULE: FIRST EX VIVO RESULTS Joshua B. Gafford, Hiroyuki.

Mo1113 RATE OF BLEEDING ON ANTIPLATELET AND ANTICOAGULANT AGENTS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SINGLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY Abhik Bhattacharya, Alfred Nelson,

Anna M. Duloy, MD, Tonya R. Kaltenbach, MD, MS, Rajesh N

Postcolonoscopy mortality: Bowel preparation to blame?

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Su1466 Multiple Pseudocysts Managed With Transpapillary Drainage

934 AUDIT AND FEEDBACK FOR COLONOSCOPY IMPROVES ENDOSCOPIST PERFORMANCE AMONGST POOR PERFORMERS: RESULTS FROM A PRAGMATIC RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Mo1335 LUMEN-APPOSING METAL STENT PLACEMENT FOR WALLED-OFF PANCREATIC NECROSIS: RESULTS OF A PRACTICE PATTERN SURVEY OF US GASTROENTEROLOGISTS M. Phillip.

Su1686 FALSE-POSITIVE FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST RESULT INFLUENCED BY SEX Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan, Enrique Santana, Joaquin Cubiella, Agustin Seoane,

542 DOES INITIAL CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH COLON DIVERTICULAR BLEEDING? Shigeyuki Kurosaki, Nobuo Toda, Junya.

Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Mo1662 SMSA-EMR SCORE IS A NOVEL ENDOSCOPIC RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR PREDICTING CRITICAL ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OUTCOMES Mayenaaz Sidhu, David.

Ihab I. Elhajj, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Endoscopic placement of video capsule in a pediatric population

Mo1674 DIFFERENCES IN DETECTION OF POLYP PATHOLOGY BASED ON ENDOSCOPIST CHARACTERISTICS AND EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF WITHDRAWAL TIME IN EXPLAINING.

Mo1114 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH REBLEEDING AFTER ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS. A RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-CENTER STUDY

Sa1320 EFFICACY OF PER-ORAL CHOLANGIOSCOPY WITH INTRADUCTAL LITHOTRIPSY FOR DIFFICULT BILIARY STONES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Thomas R.

Inadequate colonoscopy preparation: Is it time to send out an SMS?

The way to remove an over-the-scope-clip (with video)

Tu1416 REDUCTION IN LENGTH OF STAY, HOSPITAL COSTS AND HOSPITAL CHARGES FOR ALL-CAUSE ERCPS PERFORMED OVER THE WEEKEND VERSUS ERCPS THAT WERE POSTPONED.

Tu1150 A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF ENDOSCOPIC RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION IN TREATING EARLY ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL NEOPLASIA∼LESSONS FROM PATHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS.

645 DOUBLE PIGTAIL STENT PLACEMENT THROUGH LUMEN APPOSING METAL STENTS REDUCES ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEED FOR REINTERVENTION Steven Shamah, Irving Waxman,

William Berquist, MD Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Shashank Sarvepalli, Ari Garber, Awad Jarrar, John McMichael, James M

Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages iii-iv (April 2019)

404 A RANDOMIZED, ASSESSOR-BLINDED, MULTICENTER, DOSE-RANGING STUDY INVESTIGATING THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND TOLERABILITY OF SODIUM PICOSULFATE, MAGNESIUM.

766 RESUMPTION OF ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY AFTER ROUTINE ENDOSCOPY: PHYSICIAN DOCUMENTATION AND PATIENT OUTCOMES Erica Donnan, Philip Dinh, Dyanna L. Gregory,

Sa1947 ENDOSCOPIC SINUSOTOMY VS

Su1425 Efficacy of Endotherapy in Chronic Pancreatitis Pain: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis Mikram Jafri, Javed N. Sadiq, Pallav K. Parakh, Frank.

Presentation transcript:

932 POLYPS RETRIEVED WHEN TRAP IS ATTACHED TO INSTRUMENT PORT ARE MORE FREQUENTLY INTACT AND INTERPRETABLE THAN WHEN REMOVED BY CONVENTIONAL METHOD William Barge, Jason Kramer, Deepak Kumar, Deborah Giusto, Rama Behara, Shriram Jakate, Faraz Bishehsari, Salina Lee, Shubha Singh, Joshua E. Melson Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages AB132-AB133 (June 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.1340 Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, AB132-AB133DOI: (10. 1016/j. gie Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions

Phases: (I) Conventional Polypectomy Technique with finger depressing suction valve button (II) Technique with finger covering the opening of the suction valve port with valve button removed (III) Technique using Roth Net extracting polyp through instrument channel (IV) Technique with polyp trap attached to instrument channel port with suction applied. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018 87, AB132-AB133DOI: (10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.1340) Copyright © 2018 Terms and Conditions