Translocation of σ70 with RNA Polymerase during Transcription

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
The Transcriptional Regulator RfaH Stimulates RNA Chain Synthesis after Recruitment to Elongation Complexes by the Exposed Nontemplate DNA Strand  Irina.
Loading Rho to Terminate Transcription
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
The Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to Transcription
TFIIS and GreB Cell Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Xue Q. Gong, Chunfen Zhang, Michael Feig, Zachary F. Burton 
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
J.Estelle Foster, Shannon F. Holmes, Dorothy A. Erie  Cell 
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Hubert Kettenberger, Karim-Jean Armache, Patrick Cramer  Cell 
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Hung-Ta Chen, Steven Hahn  Cell 
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Structural basis of transcription activation
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Organization of an Activator-Bound RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Transcription Activation at Class II CAP-Dependent Promoters: Two Interactions between CAP and RNA Polymerase  Wei Niu, Younggyu Kim, Gregory Tau, Tomasz.
RNA Polymerase Backtracking in Gene Regulation and Genome Instability
Helicase and Polymerase Move Together Close to the Fork Junction and Copy DNA in One-Nucleotide Steps  Manjula Pandey, Smita S. Patel  Cell Reports  Volume.
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
The RNA–DNA Hybrid Maintains the Register of Transcription by Preventing Backtracking of RNA Polymerase  Evgeny Nudler, Arkady Mustaev, Alex Goldfarb,
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structures of the RNA polymerase-σ54 reveal new and conserved regulatory strategies by Yun Yang, Vidya C. Darbari, Nan Zhang, Duo Lu, Robert Glyde, Yi-Ping.
Template Switching by RNA Polymerase II In Vivo
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Molecular Structures of Transcribing RNA Polymerase I
Michael J Dye, Nick J Proudfoot  Molecular Cell 
RNA Displacement and Resolution of the Transcription Bubble during Transcription by T7 RNA Polymerase  Manli Jiang, Na Ma, Dmitry G. Vassylyev, William.
Exchange of Regions between Bacterial Poly(A) Polymerase and the CCA-Adding Enzyme Generates Altered Specificities  Heike Betat, Christiane Rammelt, Georges.
Thomas J Santangelo, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Mechanism of Intrinsic Transcription Termination
TFIIS and GreB Cell Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
Presentation transcript:

Translocation of σ70 with RNA Polymerase during Transcription Jayanta Mukhopadhyay, Achillefs N. Kapanidis, Vladimir Mekler, Ekaterine Kortkhonjia, Yon W. Ebright, Richard H. Ebright  Cell  Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages 453-463 (August 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00464-0

Figure 1 FRET Assay for Movement Relative to DNA (A) Predictions of the σ70-release (top) and σ70-nonrelease (bottom) models with respect to a “trailing-edge-FRET” experiment in which a fluorescent donor (D) is incorporated within σ70, and a fluorescent acceptor (A) is incorporated on upstream DNA. (B) Predictions of the σ70-release (top) and σ70-nonrelease (bottom) models with respect to a “leading-edge-FRET” experiment in which a fluorescent donor (D) is incorporated within σ70, and a fluorescent acceptor (A) is incorporated on downstream DNA. (C) σ70 derivatives. Map of σ70 showing conserved regions 1–4 (shaded boxes; Gross et al., 1998), determinants for interaction with promoter −10 and −35 elements (solid bars; Gross et al., 1998), and sites at which fluorescent probe was incorporated (filled circles). (D) DNA fragments. Top: DNA fragments used in analysis of RDe,11 (lacUV5 derivatives having no guanine residues on the template strand from +1 to +11, and having no fluorescent probe [as control], the fluorescent probe Cy5 at −40 [for trailing-edge FRET], or the fluorescent probe Cy5 at +25 [for leading-edge FRET]). Shaded boxes, transcription start site (with arrow), promoter −10 element, and promoter −35 element; red boxes, halt site. Middle: DNA fragments used in analysis of RDe,12, RDe,13, RDe,14, and RDe,15 (lacUV5 derivatives having no guanine residues on the template strand from +1 to +12, +1 to +13, +1 to +14, or +1 to +15, and having Cy5 at +26, +27, +28, or +29). Bottom: DNA fragment used in analysis of reference construct having 100% σ70 occupancy and having Cy5 14 bp downstream of RNAP active center (lacUV5 derivative having Cy5 at +15). (E) Formation of RDe,11, RDe,12, RDe,13, RDe,14, and RDe,15 upon addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo, and ability to restart elongation (“chase”) upon addition of CTP (experiments in gel matrix). Yields of RDe,11 through RDe,15 (determined by excision of bands and quantitation of RNA) were 0.6–0.7 mol RDe per mol DNA, identical within error to the yield defined by in-gel trailing-edge FRET (0.64; Figure 2A). Formation of RDe,n+1 is due to misincorporation at the halt site (0%–60%, depending on sequence context; see Krummel and Chamberlin, 1989; Metzger et al., 1993). (F) As (E), but experiments in solution. Yields of RDe,11 through RDe,15 (determined by excision of bands and quantitation of RNA) were 0.6–0.8 mol RDe per mol DNA, identical within error to the yield defined by in-solution trailing-edge FRET (0.65; Figure 2C) Cell 2001 106, 453-463DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00464-0)

Figure 2 σ70 Translocates with RNAP (A) Representative data for trailing-edge-FRET experiments assessing RPo and RDe,11 (data for experiments with σ70 derivative labeled at position 569 and DNA fragment lacUV5-11(Cy5,−40); experiments in gel matrix). Left panel: Blue line, fluorescence emission spectrum of RPo; red line and red dashed line, fluorescence emission spectra 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo. Right panel: Blue bars, FRET in RPo; red bars, FRET 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo. (B) Representative data for leading-edge-FRET experiments assessing RPo and RDe,11 (data for experiments with σ70 derivative labeled at position 366 and DNA fragment lacUV5-11(Cy5,+25); experiments in gel matrix). Left panel: Blue line, fluorescence emission spectrum of RPo; red solid and dashed lines, fluorescence emission spectra 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo. Center panel: Blue bars, FRET in RPo; red bars, FRET 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo. Right panel: Red hatched bars, FRET in RDe,11 (after correction for subpopulation of complexes not competent to undergo transition to elongation; see Experimental Procedures, equation 4); red open bar, FRET in reference construct having 100% σ70 occupancy and having Cy5 14 bp downstream of RNAP active center (RPo with DNA fragment having Cy5 at +15). (C) As (A), but experiments in solution. (D) As (B), but experiments in solution Cell 2001 106, 453-463DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00464-0)

Figure 3 σ70 Translocates with RNAP as a Block, with Regions 1, 2, 3, and 4 Translocating in Concert (A) Trailing-edge-FRET results for σ70 derivatives labeled at sites within regions 1, 2, 3, and 4 (DNA fragment lacUV5-11(Cy5,−40); experiments in gel matrix). Blue bars, FRET in RPo; red bars, FRET 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo. (B) Leading-edge-FRET results for σ70 derivatives labeled at sites within regions 1, 2, 3, and 4 (DNA fragment lacUV5-11(Cy5,+25); experiments in gel matrix). Blue bars, FRET in RPo; red filled bars, FRET 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo; red hatched bars, FRET in RDe,11 (after correction for subpopulation of complexes not competent to undergo transition to elongation; see Experimental Procedures, equation 4); red open bars, FRET in reference construct having 100% σ70 occupancy and having Cy5 14 bp downstream of RNAP active center (RPo with DNA fragment having Cy5 at +15). (C) Schematic interpretation of results. Probe-probe distances in RPo (left) and RDe,11(right) calculated from leading-edge-FRET results in (B) (see Experimental Procedures, equation 3). Blue at left, probe-probe distances in RPo with Cy5 at +25 (Cy5 24 bp from RNAP active center); red at left, probe-probe distances in RPo with Cy5 at +15 (reference construct; Cy5 14 bp from RNAP active center); red at right, probe-probe distances in RDe,11 with Cy5 at +25 (Cy5 14 bp from RNAP active center). Within error, probe-probe distances are identical in RPo with Cy5 at +15 (reference construct; red at left) and RDe,11 with Cy5 at +25 (red at right). (D) Structural interpretation of results. Positions of σ70 regions 1, 2, 3, and 4 in RPo (left) and RDe,11 (right). Positions of σ70 regions 1, 2, 3, and 4 are projected onto structural models of RPo (Naryshkin et al., 2000; Ebright, 2000), and RDe,11 (Korzheva et al., 2000), based on probe-probe distances in RPo with Cy5 at +15 (reference construct; Cy5 14 bp from RNAP active center; distances in red in left panel of [C]) and in RDe,11 with Cy5 at +25 (Cy5 14 bp from RNAP active center; distances in red in right panel of [C]). σ70 is in yellow; RNAP β′, β, αI, and ω subunits are in orange, green, blue, and gray; DNA template and nontemplate strands are in gray and pink. The structure of the RNAP active-center cleft constrains the 14 bp DNA segment downstream of the RNAP active center—the DNA segment relevant to comparison of probe-probe distances in left and right panels—to be an unbent, straight B-form DNA duplex (Naryshkin et al., 2000; Korzheva et al., 2000; Ebright, 2000) Cell 2001 106, 453-463DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00464-0)

Figure 4 σ70 Translocates with RNAP upon, and after, Complete Filling of the RNA Exit Channel: RDe,12, RDe,13, RDe,14, and RDe,15 (A) Leading-edge-FRET results for RDe,12, RDe,13, RDe,14, and RDe,15 (data for experiments with σ70 derivative labeled at residue 366 and DNA fragments lacUV5-12(Cy5,+26) through lacUV5-15(Cy5,+29); experiments in gel matrix). Blue bars, FRET in RPo; red filled bars, FRET 5 min and 10 min after addition of ApA, ATP, GTP, and UTP to RPo; red hatched bars, FRET in RDe,11 (after correction for subpopulation of complexes not competent to undergo transition to elongation; see Experimental Procedures, equation 4); red open bars, FRET in reference construct having 100% σ70 occupancy and having Cy5 14 bp downstream of RNAP active center (RPo with DNA fragment having Cy5 at +15). (B) As (A), but data for σ70 derivative labeled at residue 396 Cell 2001 106, 453-463DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00464-0)

Figure 5 σ70 Translocates with RNAP upon, and after, Complete Filling of the RNA Exit Channel: RDe,50 (A) Predictions of the σ70-release (top) and σ70-nonrelease (bottom) models with respect to a “core-σ70-FRET” experiment in which a fluorescent donor (D) is incorporated within RNAP, and a fluorescent acceptor (A) is incorporated within σ70. (B) Labeling of RNAP (subunit composition β′βαIαIIω). Left, intein-mediated C-terminal labeling with Cys-fluorescein (see Experimental Procedures, RNAP Derivatives; see also Chong et al., 1996,1997; Muir et al., 1998). Top right, synthesis of Cys-fluorescein. Bottom right, strategy for site-specific incorporation of fluorescein within intact, fully assembled, RNAP (at residue 1377 of β′). CBD, chitin binding domain; Cys-F, Cys-fluorescein Cell 2001 106, 453-463DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00464-0)