Katelyn T. Byrne, Robert H. Vonderheide  Cell Reports 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Is Required for Tumor Vasculogenesis but Not for Angiogenesis: Role of Bone Marrow-Derived Myelomonocytic Cells  G-One Ahn,
Advertisements

Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Host-Derived CD8+ Dendritic Cells Protect Against Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Experimental Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation  Michael Weber,
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Pathways Responsible for Human Autoantibody and Therapeutic Intravenous IgG Activity in Humanized Mice  Inessa Schwab, Anja Lux, Falk Nimmerjahn  Cell.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (February 2016)
Tatsukuni Ohno, Yuta Kondo, Chenyang Zhang, Siwen Kang, Miyuki Azuma 
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Interaction between B7-H1 and PD-1 determines initiation and reversal of T-cell anergy by Fumihiko Tsushima, Sheng Yao, Tahiro Shin, Andrew Flies, Sarah.
Brian Hutzen, Chun-Yu Chen, Pin-Yi Wang, Les Sprague, Hayley M
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Preventing Allograft Rejection by Targeting Immune Metabolism
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Dynamic Interplay among Monocyte-Derived, Dermal, and Resident Lymph Node Dendritic Cells during the Generation of Vaccine Immunity to Fungi  Karen Ersland,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
by Adrienne Sallets, Sophie Robinson, Adel Kardosh, and Ronald Levy
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Fig. 5 Local gel scaffold for T cell memory response.
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Is Required for Tumor Vasculogenesis but Not for Angiogenesis: Role of Bone Marrow-Derived Myelomonocytic Cells  G-One Ahn,
A Mutation in the Nlrp3 Gene Causing Inflammasome Hyperactivation Potentiates Th17 Cell-Dominant Immune Responses  Guangxun Meng, Fuping Zhang, Ivan Fuss,
Reovirus FAST Protein Enhances Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Oncolytic Virotherapy in Primary and Metastatic Tumor Models  Fabrice Le Boeuf, Simon Gebremeskel,
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Katelyn T. Byrne, Robert H. Vonderheide  Cell Reports 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Melissa B. Uccellini, Adolfo García-Sastre  Cell Reports 
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2018)
Sindbis Viral Vectors Transiently Deliver Tumor-associated Antigens to Lymph Nodes and Elicit Diversified Antitumor CD8+ T-cell Immunity  Tomer Granot,
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2019)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2018)
Presentation transcript:

CD40 Stimulation Obviates Innate Sensors and Drives T Cell Immunity in Cancer  Katelyn T. Byrne, Robert H. Vonderheide  Cell Reports  Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 2719-2732 (June 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058 Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2016 15, 2719-2732DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Gem/nP/αCD40 Drives T Cell-Dependent Regressions of PDA Mice were injected with PDA 4662 cells subcutaneously and, after 12 days of growth, tumors were treated with Gem/nP followed by αCD40 2 days later. (A) Left, change in tumor volume on day 24 compared to start of treatment (day 12), representative of seven independent experiments. Right, the total proportion of regressors/experiment, from 13 individual experiments, with the total number of mice/group shown below. (B) Tumor growth kinetics for mice from (A). (C) Survival curve for mice treated as described in (A), from two combined experiments. (D) Survival after second tumor injection >60 days after primary tumor injection. Some mice received αCD8, representative of two independent experiments. (E) Mice were treated as described in (A), and with αCD4 and/or αCD8. On the left, the change in tumor growth compared to baseline is shown, and, on the right, tumor growth kinetics are shown. The data are representative of three independent experiments. Each experiment had 4–10 mice/group, each bar represents a single mouse, and each symbol represents a group, the horizontal line and error bars indicate mean ± SEM. The statistical analyses by one-way ANOVA (A), two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post test (B and E), or log-rank test (C and D) are shown. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2016 15, 2719-2732DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Gem/nP/αCD40 Therapy Alters T Cell Subsets, Repertoire, and Function in PDA Tumors in an IFN-γ-Dependent Manner (A–D) Mice were treated as described in Figure 1A, and tumors were harvested 24 days (A–C) or 19 days (D) after tumor injection (12 and 7 days after initiation of treatment, respectively) and analyzed by flow cytometry with regard to the proportion (A, B, and D) of the indicated subsets or the ratios of the absolute number of cells/gram of tumor (C) among live, CD45+ CD3+ cells. (E and F) Tumors were harvested on day 24 and analyzed by TCR deep sequencing. Mice are grouped based on receiving CD40 (top) or Gem/nP (bottom), and the cumulative frequencies of Rare (representing <10−5 total clones), Small (10−5 to < 10−4), Medium (10−4 to < 10−3), Large (10−3 to < 10−2), or Hyperexpanded (10−2 to 1) clones within the total repertoire are indicated (E), or the repertoire diversity (“true diversity,” indicating effective number of clones) for the top 10, top 20, or entire population (far left to middle right), or the Gini coefficient (0 indicating polyclonal and 1 indicating monoclonal) on far right (F). (G) Tumors were harvested at day 24 and analyzed by flow cytometry with regard to the indicated parameters among CD4+ (left) or CD8+ (right) live, CD45+ CD3+ cells. (H) IFN-γ KO mice were treated as described in Figure 1A. The change in tumor volume on day 24 (left) with growth kinetics (right) are shown. (I) Tumors were analyzed on day 24 by flow cytometry with regard to the indicated subsets or ratios among live, CD45+ CD3+ cells. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, the horizontal lines indicate mean ± SD (A–G and I) except for (H), where each bar represents a single mouse and each symbol represents a group with mean ± SEM. The data are representative of 3–5 independent experiments with 4–6 mice/group, except TCR deep sequencing data, which is one experiment with 8–9 mice/group. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA (A–D, G, and I), Mann-Whitney t test (E and F), or two-way ANOVA (H) with Tukey’s HSD post test. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2016 15, 2719-2732DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gem/nP/αCD40 Therapy Requires Host CD40, Activates Antigen-Presenting Cells, and Requires Batf3+ Dendritic Cells for Efficacy Mice were treated as described in Figure 1A. (A and B) CD40 KO mice. (A) Left, change in tumor volume on day 24 versus day 12 (start of therapy). The tumor growth kinetics are shown on the right. (B) Tumors were analyzed on day 24 with regard to the proportions of indicated cells and ratios among live, CD45+ CD3+ cells. (C) μMT KO mice. The change in tumor volume on day 24 compared to day 12 is shown on the left. The tumor growth kinetics are shown on the right. (D–F) Mice were treated as described in Figure 1A, and tumors were harvested on day 15 (24 hr after receiving CD40) and analyzed by flow cytometry with regards to the proportions of indicated subsets among live, CD45+ CD3− cells. The CD11c+ cells are also CD11b− F4/80−. (G) Batf3 KO mice treated as in Figure 1A. The change in tumor volume on day 24 versus day 12 is shown on the left, and the tumor growth kinetics are shown on the right. Each bar represents an individual mouse, the symbols indicate groups, and the horizontal lines indicate mean ± SEM (A, C, and G) or each symbol represents an individual mouse, with mean ± SD (B and D–F). Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA (B and D–F) or two-way ANOVA (A, C, and G) with Tukey’s HSD post test is shown. See also Figure S4 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2016 15, 2719-2732DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Spontaneous Tumors in KPC Mice Respond to Gem/nP/αCD40 Therapy in T Cell-Dependent Fashion KPC mice diagnosed with established tumors received Gem/nP on day 0 and day 7 and αCD40 was given on day 2. Some mice (as indicated) also received αCD8 depletion for the duration of enrollment. (A) The change in tumor volume on day 14 compared to initial tumor volume at diagnosis, responders calculated in table below. (B) Tumor growth curves for indicated groups, responders indicated in red. (C) Representative histological samples from (A) at day 14, stained for CD8, shown on left at two magnifications, quantification of global CD8 staining in tumors on right. The scale bar represents 200 μm (top) or 300 μm (bottom). (D) Representative H&E samples of tumors from (A) at day 14 shown on left, quantification of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) in entire tumor section on right. The arrowheads (2×) point to TLS (top), the asterisk indicates a tumor-associated lymph node, and the outline indicates the field below (20×). The scale bar represents 1,000 μm (top) or 100 μm (bottom). Each bar, line, or symbol represents an individual mouse and the horizontal lines indicate mean ± SD. The statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post test (C and D) and Fisher’s exact test (A) are shown. Cell Reports 2016 15, 2719-2732DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Gem/nP/αCD40 Therapy Bypasses Innate Immune Sensors for Treatment Efficacy Mice were treated as outlined in Figure 1A, and for each panel: left, change in tumor volume on day 24 compared to day 12 (start of therapy), right, tumor growth kinetics. (A–H) TLR4 KO (A), MyD88 KO (B), TRIF KO (C), Casp 11 KO (D), P2X7R KO (E), STING Mut (F), IFNAR KO (G), and IL-12p40 KO (H). Each bar represents a single mouse, each symbol represents a group with error bars indicating mean ± SEM, and the data show representatives of 2–5 independent experiments for each KO strain with 4–10 mice per group. The statistical analysis was by two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post test. Cell Reports 2016 15, 2719-2732DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.058) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions