A Watershed Approach to Environmental Restoration in Mecklenburg County David A. Woodie, PE, CPSWQ Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

HR A 1 © Copyright 2004 The Trust for Public Land O`ahu Land Trust Forum January 20, 2007.

Advertisements

Heartland Coast-to-Coast Corridor Study ___________________ Presented Sept. 11, 2007 Sanibel Harbour Resort Spa Heartland Coast-to-Coast Corridor Study.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Northern Australia floodplain and coastal wetlands Max Finlayson National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Darwin,

1. 2 PERCENTAGE FOR IACHR IN THE OAS 2009 BUDGET (US$ 3,746,100)

Implement the Grande Ronde Model Watershed Program Administration and Habitat Restoration Projects Project Lyle Kuchenbecker, Project Planner.

Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.

WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council 2007 SRFB & PSAR Grants Project Subcommittee Report & Recommendations July 19, 2007.

Toulouse, May 2011, Slide 1 20 x 20. Toulouse, May 2011, Slide 2 20 x 20.

Presenter Name(s) Issue date National Student.

Piceance Basin Natural Gas Development Program

Mary Guokas Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation.

Prescott Circle Trail Fulfilling a Vision

Marin Coastal Permit Coordination Program North Bay Watershed Association January 18, 2011.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 $200 $300 $400.

Floodplain Management and Restoration in Charlotte-Mecklenburg

1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.

Minnesota Clean Water Fund Conservation Drainage Grants Managing Water, Harvesting Results – America's Ag Water Management Summit October , 2011,

The Practical Application of Geology to the Mitigation and Regulation of Isolated Wetlands November 6, 2012 Geological Society of America Charlotte, NC.

AUTAUGA CREEK BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT, 2009 Will S. Mooty USGS.

Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.

LA Sanitations Capital Program Leading the Way to a Clean, Green, and Sustainable City Enrique C. Zaldivar, P.E. Director LA Sanitation June 14, 2012.

EU Market Situation for Eggs and Poultry Management Committee 21 June 2012.

A sampling of stream and watershed improvement projects in the Lower Gallatin watershed.

Opioid-Related Deaths and Mortality Rates by County, Wisconsin Residents Office of Health Informatics and AIDS/HIV and Hepatitis C Program Bureau.

Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Copyright © 2005 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved.

AP CALCULUS AB 2012 Question 6 Form A Name_________________ Date __________Period___.

LID Overview Low Impact Development “Redefining Storm Water” In Mecklenburg County Presented by: David Woodie, PE, CPSWQ Project Manager, Charlotte-Mecklenburg.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Welcomes ASU and the Town of Boone To Our Side of the Storm (How to manage the “perfect Storm”)

NC River Basins.

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee Sept. 22 & Oct. 13, 2009 I/I Grant Program Discussion.

Joint Work Session Skagit County Planning Commission and Shoreline Advisory Committee May 22, 2012.

Source: Financial Times of London Global Banks 1999 – 2009 “Changing of the Guard”

To insert photo, click View > Master > Slide Master 1.42” x 1.83" To insert photo, click View > Master > Slide Master 2” x 2.68" To insert photo, click.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG and Taking Care of People! Ecosystem Restoration Along the Los Angeles River: Creativity within Concrete Dan.

CAP CAVSARP: Clearwater Facility. CAP (Central Arizona Project) In 1980, Arizona overdraft: 2.5 million acre feet year (afy) groundwater deficit due to.

PRESENTATION SUMMARY Introduction Introduction – Overview (M. Ryan) Geography Geography – Living with the Red (M. Clamen) Conclusions and Recommendations.

Name ____________________ Date ___________ Period ____.

Environmental Trust Funding Categories ▪ Habitat: actions to preserve or restore native habitats and areas critical to at-risk, rare or endangered.

RIVERBEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT JANUARY 15, 2008 Environmental Consulting & Design, Inc.

The Event The Fort Collins flood was the biggest natural disaster to ever affect the city (in 130 years of record). Largest 24-hour rainfall ever to fall.

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) Project Implementation.

Project Ranking Results Presented at the 8 th Stakeholder Meeting Hal Bryson, EEP Western Watershed Planner January 12th, 2010.

NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.

Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition City Council Workshop November 12, 2013.

The Risk is Real… Be PREPARED! Robert Billings, PE, PH, CFM Flood Mitigation Project Manager Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services May 18, 2011 Briar.

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRIT) Eastgate Shopping Center Chapel Hill, NC September 9, 2008.

Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.

Jan 22-24, 2007 Transportation Research Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District North Carolina’s Interagency Agreements to Streamline Project.

LCRA Highland Lakes Watershed Ordinance

MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESSES Citizens Capital Budget Advisory Committee Presentation November 1,

 Part 2: Community Design: Respect and Care for the Natural Environment Joe Duggan 1.

Energy PUBLIC Running Water: Effective Stormwater Quality Practices Tracy Warner, Municipal Engineer for Ames, IA Josh Shields, Landscape Architect with.

Safeguarding Communities from Floods Betsy Otto, Vice President, Conservation and Strategic Partnerships ~ U.S. Conference of.

Andrew Heath Executive Director PA Growing Greener Coalition 1.

CleanWaterManagementTrustFund Clean Water Management Trust Fund Need For program History of CWMTF Eligible projects Examples of Projects Across State Questions.

Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.

Green Infrastructure Considerations and Opportunities in Superfund Reuse Projects Michele Mahoney.

NC EQIP and the Western NC Stream Initiative Dick Everhart – Resource Institute Kevin Tweedy - EPR.

COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.

Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.

Opequon Targeted Watershed Partner’s Meeting – BMPs Cully Hession, Jim Lawrence, and Andrea Ludwig October 19, 2007.

Lake Raleigh Wetland Creation Feasibility Study NC State Centennial Campus Melanie Carter, Jennifer Burdette, Amanda Jones.

Sierra Water Work Group Summit June Tuolumne Stanislaus Region.

A New Approach to Protecting Water Quality in Gallatin County through Better Site Design Tammy Crone, Water Quality Specialist.

What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.

STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.

CONSERVATION AND RESOURSE PROTECTION GRANT PROGRAM NEVADA DIVISION OF STATE LANDS Question 1.

Anne Arundel County Maryland

Study of Miles City Slough

FEMA and Stream Restoration

Presentation transcript:

A Watershed Approach to Environmental Restoration in Mecklenburg County David A. Woodie, PE, CPSWQ Mecklenburg County Land Use & Environmental Services Agency Special Thanks to: Emily G. Reinicker, PE, CFM Jason Claudio-Diaz, PE, CFM Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Kimley-Horn and Assoc., Inc.

WATERSHED / BASINS 330± miles of FEMA streams330± miles of FEMA streams 32 watersheds32 watersheds All water in Mecklenburg County (except Catawba River) originates in Mecklenburg CountyAll water in Mecklenburg County (except Catawba River) originates in Mecklenburg County

Presentation Overview Early Planning Process Funding Partners and Stakeholders Overview Map Project Reaches Monitoring Program Mecklenburg County Water Quality Making a difference

Early Planning Process Master Plan Set in Motion after flooding in 1997; FEMA Buyouts 2000 Little Sugar Creek Master Plan adopted by BOCC 2004 Stakeholders Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Funding Partners FEMA Buyout Grants Clean Water Management Trust Fund NCDOT Ped Grants NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program NC Division of Water Resources Charlotte DOT

WATERSHED / BASINS Little Sugar Creek Little Sugar CreekWatershed Collects East side of GreaterCollects East side of Greater Uptown Charlotte.Uptown Charlotte. Over 43% imperviousOver 43% impervious

Little Sugar Creek Watershed Overview Map Nine Projects in the Ground over Twelve Years.

Little Sugar Creek Watershed Project Reaches Hidden Valley Ecological Park Cullman Avenue Water Quality Enhancement Project 7 th Street Reach at Central Piedmont Community College Elizabeth Reach of the Little Sugar Creek Greenway Midtown Reach of the Little Sugar Creek Greenway Kings Drive Reach of the Little Sugar Creek Greenway Liz Hair Nature Trail Freedom Park Mitigation Project Westfield Environmental Restoration

Little Sugar Creek Hidden Valley Ecological Park Project Overview Drainage area 1.5 sq miles 3,500 LF and12 BMP cells Floodplain buyout 17 homes Project Goals Improve WQ Habitat Restoration Primary Sponsor: CMSWS with CWMTF Design date Construction date Construction Cost $3.1M

Little Sugar Creek Hidden Valley Ecological Park Site photos

Little Sugar Creek Hidden Valley Ecological Park Site photos

Little Sugar Creek Hidden Valley Ecological Park

Site photos

Little Sugar Creek Cullman Avenue Project Overview Drainage area 3.4 sq mi 1,100 LF and Bioretention BMP Project Goals Water Quality Enhancement Habitat Restoration Primary Sponsor: CMSWS Design Construction Construction Cost $260K

Little Sugar Creek Cullman Avenue

Little Sugar Creek Greenway Urban Reaches ELIZABETH REACH MIDTOWN REACH KINGS DRIVE REACH

Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Elizabeth Reach Project Overview Drainage area 10.2 sq mi 3,500 LF and BMP Pond Project Goals Habitat Restoration Water Quality Primary Sponsor: CMSWS Design Construction Construction Cost $450K

Site photos Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Elizabeth Reach

Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Midtown Reach Project Overview Drainage area 10.6 sq mi 3,500 LF and BMP Pond Project Goals Habitat Restoration Water Quality Primary Sponsor: CMSWS Design Construction Construction Cost $130K

Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Midtown Reach Before Demolition 1999 Aerial

Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Midtown Reach

Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Kings Drive Reach Project Overview Drainage area 11.5 sq miles 2,000 LF and Wetland BMPs Project Goals Habitat Restoration Water Quality Greemway Primary Sponsor: CMSWS Design Construction Construction Cost $1.35M

Site photos Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Kings Drive Reach 1999 Aerial 2005 Aerial

Site photos Little Sugar Creek Greenway: Kings Drive Reach

Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Trail Project Overview Drainage area 12.0 sq mi 3,400 LF Project Goals Habitat Restoration Primary Sponsor: CMSWS Design 2003 Construction 2004 Construction Cost $130K

Little Sugar Creek Liz Hair Nature Trail

Little Sugar Creek Freedom Park Mitigation Project Project Overview Drainage area 13.6 sq mi 4,400 LF Project Goals Mitigation Credit Primary Sponsor: NC EEP Design 2002 Construction 2003 Construction Cost $1.8M

Little Sugar Creek Freedom Park Mitigation Project

Little Sugar Creek Westfield Environmental Restoration Project Overview Drainage area 15.0 sq mi 5,200 LF and 7 BMP cells Project Goals Habitat Restoration Water Quality Greenway Primary Sponsors CMSWS, Park & Rec Design 2003 Construction 2004 Construction Cost $2.49M

Site photos Little Sugar Creek Westfield Environmental Restoration

Site photos Little Sugar Creek Westfield Environmental Restoration