Alexander W. Chao (SLAC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXTRACTION BEAM LOSS AT 1 TEV CM WITH TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov, G. White August 25, 2014.
Advertisements

Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Collisions / Transport.
A new algorithm for the kinetic analysis of intra-beam scattering in storage rings. P.R.Zenkevich*,O. Boine-Frenkenheim**, A. Ye. Bolshakov* *ITEP, Moscow,
Beam-beam simulations M.E. Biagini, K. Ohmi, E. Paoloni, P. Raimondi, D. Shatilov, M. Zobov INFN Frascati, KEK, INFN Pisa, SLAC, BINP April 26th, 2006.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
Scaling of High-Energy e+e- Ring Colliders K. Yokoya Accelerator Seminar, KEK 2012/3/15 Accelerator Seminar Yokoya 1.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
M.E. Biagini, M. Boscolo, T. Demma (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Status of Multi-particle simulation of INFN.
Implementation and study of depolarizing effects in GUINEA-PIG++ beam-beam interaction simulation Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators 3 rd -4.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
SuperB with Two Interaction Regions Is it possible to obtain luminosity per each IP? P.Raimondi, D.N.Shatilov, A.Variola,M.Zobov.
Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay CARE 05, Geneva, November 2005.
Systematic limitations to luminosity determination in the LumiCal acceptance from beam-beam effects C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay LCWS06, Bangalore, 9-13 March.
Impact of electromagnetic deflection due to beam-beam effect on Bhabha scattering C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Krakow, February
IBS and luminosity evolution with higher harmonic RF Tom Mertens (former Technical Student now doing PhD in Quantum Field Theory in Brussels) Some changes.
GUINEA-PIG: Beam-beam interaction simulation status M. Alabau, P. Bambade, O. Dadoun, G. Le Meur, C. Rimbault, F. Touze LAL - Orsay D. Schulte CERN - Genève.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
Beam-Beam simulation and experiments in RHIC By Vahid Ranjbar and Tanaji Sen FNAL.
Beam-Beam Effects in the LHeC Edward Nissen 1LHeC Workshop June
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Simulation of Intrabeam Scattering A. Vivoli*, M. Martini Thanks to : Y. Papaphilippou and F. Antoniou *
Study of the Differential Luminosity Spectrum Measurement using Bhabha Events in 350GeV WANG Sicheng 王 思丞 Supervisor: André Sailer.
1 Impact de l’effet faisceau-faisceau sur la precision de la mesure de la luminosité à l’ILC Cécile Rimbault, LAL Orsay SOCLE,19-20 Novembre 2007, Clermont-Ferrand.
T. Demma (INFN-LNF) In collaboration with: M. Boscolo (INFN-LNF) A. Chao, M.T.F. Pivi (SLAC). Macroparticle simulation of IBS in SuperB.
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
Where do the protons go II? Mike Lamont LBOC 2 nd February 2016 Acknowledgements TOTEM in the first few slides.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Beam-Beam interaction SIMulation: GUINEA-PIG
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
Crab Waist at DAFNE: Numerical Simulations versus Experimental Results
Beam-beam effect with an external noise in LHC
fundamental equations of LHC performance
The Interaction Region
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
IR Summary M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting XII
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
Other beam-induced background at the IP
GPU-accelerated Weak-Strong Simulations of Head-on Beam-Beam effects
Intra-Beam Scattering modeling for SuperB and CLIC
sx* Limitations and Improvements Paths
GUINEA-PIG++ Workshop on Spin Simulation Tools, 9-11 Nov 2010, DESY
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Preliminary results on depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB Cecile Rimbault LAL - Orsay.
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
IMPACT Simulation of the Montague Resonance at PS
Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
Beam-beam simulations with crossing anlge + crab-waist
Beam-Beam Effects in the CEPC
Efficiency of Two-Stage Collimation System
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB
Collimator Efficiency Study
Some Issues on Beam-Beam Interaction & DA at CEPC
Beam-beam simulations
Presentation transcript:

Alexander W. Chao (SLAC) Beam-Beam diffusion Alexander W. Chao (SLAC) Cécile Rimbault (LAL) A.C. would like to thank Eugene Perevedentsev for illuminating discussions.

Beam-Beam diffusion Beam-beam diffusion caused by discrete-particle scatterings with coulomb scattering angle : (b=impact parameter) This can leads to: Reduction of beam life time (particle loss during collision) Emittance growth Spin diffusion Is it a problem for SuperB?  should be studied because SuperB’s luminosity comes from colliding a small number of particles which are sharply focussed. The small number of colliding particles implies larger statistical effects. tests comparing kick angle from gaussian distribution charge (GUINEA-PIG++ simulation) and discrete point charges

Simulations GUINEA-PIG++ (GP++): kick calculated from gaussian field 1slice-slice interaction with sx=8mm, sy=36nm, bx=25.3mm, by=0.25mm, N= NB (sx/f)/sz=3 109, E=5.3 GeV Nmacro (M) varies from 5000 to 60000 Grid parameters have also been tested Beam-beam diffusion Use same as GP++ initial distribution. Calculate a kick of 2req/gb (with q=N/M) for each Mparticle-Mparticle collision and sum for each Mpart.  Comparisons of the kick from gaussian (which does not contain diffusion) with the kick from Mparticles (which contains diffusion)

kick from gaussian field and kick from multiparticles scattering Comparison of kick from gaussian field and kick from multiparticles scattering Larger angles from diffusion: need to study particle loss

Emittance diffusion Emittance diffusion and spin diffusion are charaterized by Qx and Qy From theory , corresponding to an emittance diffusion time of 46s and a spin diffusion time of 4.6h From simulation Qy is 3.3 larger, means tdiff = 14s and a spin diffusion time of 1.4h

Beam lifetime Beam lifetime is charaterized by the probability for a particle to be lost during the collision. From theory , corresponding to a beam lifetime of 40mn Floss=Nloss/M, Nloss = Nb of part. for which with ncutoff =2,3,4 s’x= 320 mrad s’y= 144 mrad From simulation Floss is ~7.3 smaller, means tloss = 292mn

Beam-Beam diffusion conclusion Nice accordance between theory and simulation  Beam life time due to beam-beam diffusion = 292mn Emittance diffusion time = 14s Spin diffusion time = 1.4 h Small effects, should not be a problem for SuperB Need to be confirmed by other theories and more simulations