Wholesale Electricity Costs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Alberta’s Future Electricity Needs: What’s the Real Story? Economic Developers of Alberta Annual Professional Conference April 10, 2014 John Esaiw, Director.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Ontario Electricity Industry : Planning Ahead Amir Shalaby VP, Power System Planning Ontario Power Authority Presentation to Canadian Nuclear Society The.
Energy supply forecast Presentation to Connecticut’s Energy Future Conference by Bridgett Neely, London Economics International LLC December 2, 2004 Hartford,
SEPTEMBER 29, 2014 | CONCORD, NH Eric Johnson DIRECTOR, EXTERNAL AFFAIRS New Hampshire Energy Summit Lessons Learned from Winter 2014 and How the ISO Is.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Wholesale Electricity Market – Western Australia APEx Conference 2008 – Sydney Allan Dawson 13 October 2008.
Electric Energy Issues and the Region Connecticut Business and Industry Association Stamford, Connecticut December 2, 2004 Kevin Kirby Vice President,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Environmental Issues in System Planning Jim Platts – ISO New England NARUC Summer Meeting – New York City July 15, 2007.
September 21, 2005 ICF Consulting RGGI Electricity Sector Modeling Results Updated Reference, RGGI Package and Sensitivities.
RGGI Workshop on Electricity Markets, Reliability and Planning Topic Session 3: RGGI Design, Markets and Reliability – Issues Relating to System Operations.
Ramping and Demand Shifting: A Case Study Tim Mount Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Demand Response.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Market Response to Winter Dupont Group Energy Summit New England Power Generators Association Carol J. Holahan, Esq. October 5, 2015.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Overview of Draft Sixth Power Plan Council Meeting Whitefish, MT June 9-11, 2009.
Consumer Cost Effectiveness of Carbon Mitigation Policies in Restructured Electricity Market Jared Moore and Jay Apt (adviser) CMU Engineering and Public.
Energy: Challenges with Becoming More Sustainable © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Robb Anderson Director.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Zsuzsanna Csereklyei & David Stern
Aligning the Gas and Electric Markets: EDF Solutions
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
The Urgency to Re-Invent Nuclear Power in the U.S.
Global Energy Problems and Counter Policies and Measures of Korea
Electricity, Carbon and Competition
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
Retail Treatment of Zonal Generation Prices in Massachusetts
Benefits of ICAP Reliability Economics
penetration of wind power
Evolving Economic Dispatch in SPP
Fuel Diversity for Electric Power Generation in New England
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Michael I. Henderson ISO New England Inc.
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
What, Me, Worry? The New Outlook for Natural Gas in New England
Basin Electric SPP Market Update
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
New England Resource Adequacy
Division of Energy Resources
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
EVP, Chief Administrative Officer
Presentation Title January 3, 2019
The Green Communities Act: WMECO perspective
About Dominion: One of America’s Leading Energy Companies
Is New England Over-Reliant On Natural Gas?
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable NEPOOL Generator Information System (GIS) Robert Ludlow March 15, 2002.
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
New England Roundtable
Creating Benefits for New England: Putting the Pieces Together
Wind Development & Policy Options
Solar Energy Commercialization
Dr. Richard A. Rosen Tellus Institute – Boston, MA
LICAP Settlement: Demand Resources
The Risks to Coal Plants in Coming Years
Winter Reliability Program Updated
Creating Benefits for New England: Putting the Pieces Together
Presentation transcript:

Wholesale Electricity Costs May 19, 2006 Massachusetts Electricity Restructuring Roundtable Bob Ethier, Chief Economist and Director, Resource Adequacy

Overview Power prices have increased Higher fuel prices Increased power use Average and on-peak Steps can be taken to reduce electricity costs New England must become more efficient (price responsive) Time-differentiated retail rates can encourage consumers to use power when its cheaper Market investment in lower cost base load resources needed MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Dispatching Resources ISO uses least expensive mix of resources to meet minute-to-minute power needs of the region Accounting for transmission constraints and potential outages Most expensive needed resource sets market clearing price for all (Uniform Clearing Price Auction) Sends a clear signal to investors and the region on what resources should be developed Responds immediately to changed market conditions Encourages marginal-cost based offers so that the most efficient units are dispatched Region-wide economic dispatch in place for 35 years in New England MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Dispatching Resources: All Resources Needed to Meet Demand Paid Uniform Clearing Price $65 Demand Forecast Actual Demand UCP $0 $10 $30 $45 $100 Demand and generation (MW) MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Electricity Prices Increased in 2005 Average system price of $79.96/MWh was 47% higher than 2004 Increase is due to increased fuel costs and increased demand 44% increase in natural gas prices Increase in peak and average use over previous years Higher cost gas and oil units set price more than 80% of the time Changes in the prices of these fuels are quickly reflected in wholesale electricity prices Retail price increases for the 05/06 winter were also significant In most states the timing of the increase lags behind wholesale market conditions Reduces the ability of consumer behavior to lower wholesale prices MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

New England’s Generation Mix: More Than 60% Natural Gas and Oil MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Electricity Prices Track Fuel Prices Average Monthly Electricity, Natural Gas and Oil Prices $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 Mar-03 Aug-03 Jan-04 Jun-04 Nov-04 Apr-05 Sep-05 Feb-06 $/MWh $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $/MMBTu Hub Nat Gas Oil MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Which Units Are Setting Prices in the Energy Market? MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Electricity Use on the Rise New England set new record for electricity use in 2005 Peak growth Average consumption Projected annual growth in New England peak demand 2006-2015: 1.9% MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Addressing Increased Prices Reduce demand Energy efficiency Demand Response Peak shaving Conservation Investment in lower cost resources Efficient units, and those with lower fuel costs MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Higher Prices Drive Investment Higher electricity prices provide increased incentives for investing in resources that don’t use higher-priced natural gas Large increase in interest in wind power Interest in developing coal gasification plants Siting of generating resources is difficult in New England MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Analyzing Electricity Costs 2006 Regional System Plan (RSP06) will estimate how certain actions can affect costs RSP06 will model a number of scenarios to determine their effect on prices, including: Addition of a 1,000 MW base load resource Addition of a 1,000 MW clean-coal generator 5% load growth without generation addition 5% on-peak conservation Addition of 500 MW of load response MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Controlling Electricity Costs: Results 1 Add baseload - 5.70% $600 million $470 million 2 Add coal 5.60% $590 million $300 million 3 5% growth 5.80% $420 million $90 million 4 5% reduction 4.70% $490 million $360 million 5 Load response 0.02% $2 million $0.5 million $30 million % Change in Wholesale Electricity Price Change in Total Consumer Costs Change in Total Production Costs Change in Total Capacity Costs Note: RSP06 will provide an indication of the relative market and reliability benefits from different resources in each sub-area. MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Wholesale-Retail Linkages Retail and wholesale markets are disconnected Flat retail pricing provides no incentive to reduce use when wholesale prices are highest States can encourage energy efficiency and conservation by adopting time-differentiated retail rates Consumers shifting power use to cheaper hours of the day will make better use of the existing power system Lowers energy market prices Reduces capacity payments by deferring need to build infrastructure MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.

Recommendations for Massachusetts Adopt time-differentiated retail pricing for large customers Encourage efficiency Offer opportunity to manage energy costs The more eligible consumers, the better Adopt policies that encourage a more diverse set of resources (i.e. nuclear, clean coal, renewables) Including facility siting and air permits that provide flexibility needed for reliability and economics Continue active involvement in the regional planning process for the power system and wholesale markets MA Roundtable © 2006 ISO New England Inc.