Title: Reducing Wait Time for clients

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Title) Name(s) of presenter(s) Organizational Affiliation Welcome WI Mental Health Collaborative V February 24, 2014.
Advertisements

ASSESSORS ORIENTATION 2008 DEPARTMENTAL SERVICE EXCELLENCE AWARDS.
CSCU 411 Software Engineering Chapter 2 Introduction to Software Engineering Management.
Family Outreach and Response Program Strategic Plan September 26 th, 2012.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
West Impl 1© The Delos Partnership 2005 Integrated Enterprise Leadership Implementation.
For Corporate and Regional Office sites Guidelines for Developing a Simplified Purchase Recommendation.
Patient Safety Friendly Hospital Intiative Purpose Implementation of a set of patient safety standards in hospitals Implementation of a set of patient.
Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Improving Client Engagement & Retention Lynn M Madden, MPA Reduce Waiting.
Introducing Project Management Update December 2011.
TDRp Implementation Challenges David Vance, Executive Director Peggy Parskey, Assistant Director October 23, 2014.
1 Project Management C13PM Session 2 Project Initiation & Definition Russell Taylor Business Department Staff Workroom
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Driving to Results: Key Changes and Leadership Behaviors: Management Systems to Deploy & Sustain the Improvements David Munch M.D. IHI Faculty Chief Clinical.
Overview NIATx Model. NIATx History RWJF and SAMHSA Supported and Field Testing Development driven by proven methods and tools –Customer-focused –Use.
Winning for customers!.
2016 Highlights and 2017 Goals and Initiatives
Well Trained International
Team Name Date.
Clinical Area of Focus: Group Members: Faculty Advisor:
Title: Scope/Boundaries: Team Executive Sponsor:
Scientific Thinking through the Stages of a QI Project
Managing performance What is it? Why? How?.
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Title: Enhancing Client Experience by Simplifying the Way in Which Client May Express Concerns and Receive Information Scope/Boundaries: Pilot phase for.
Project Lead/Improvement Advisor:
RRI MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Year 1 Results May 2012 NDPC SD and WVDE
Title: Owner: Ver: Date:
Scorecards & Visual Display of Data
Guidance notes for Project Manager
The Board’s Role in Quality
Age Friendly Communities
AHPs leading better care in a multi professional, partnership setting.
Quality Department
By Jeff Burklo, Director
11/28/2018 4:14 PM World Café: Better Living Health Title: Improving Client Access to Services through Central Intake January 21, 2015.
Quality Improvement Indicators and Targets
Project Status: [Project Name]
12/9/2018 3:38 PM Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs): Aligning the Content to the QIP Guidelines.
Recommendations for using this ‘framework’ template
Title: Medication Error Process Improvement Plan
Quality Aims: The Foundation for a Quality Plan
Safety Management System Implementation
Accelerating implementation of First Link®
2/16/ :01 PM Driver Diagrams.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Professional development
Action Planning for Quality Improvement
Title: Improving Client Accessibility to Services through Central Intake (Better Living Health and Community Services) Scope/Boundaries: Team Leads Executive.
SLE Information.
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Scope/Boundaries: Client Intake to First Attendance Day in ADS Team
Developing Metrics to Assess Community Impact The Anchor Dashboard
Strategy
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
Chartering a project for improvement
Performance Improvement Project
Title: Transition Scope/Boundaries: from identification of ineligibility to discharge Team Executive Sponsor: Mary Jo Dunlop Project Lead/Improvement.
Employer Engagement Service
Strategy Analysis and organization design
Leadership Video Q&A Prompt
Sepsis Program Development
Engaging Senior Executives
Project Planning Charter
Project Name Here Kick-off Date
Presentation transcript:

Title: Reducing Wait Time for clients Scope/Boundaries: The Intake Counsellor in Hamilton Halton and the Counsellors & Educators in Brant and Haldimand Norfolk offices will start tracking the dates when referrals come in (fax, in person, call) and when the service is actually offered. We will do a PDSA exercise with clients contacting us during the month of January 2015 Team Executive Sponsor: Mary Burnett Project Lead: JoAnne Chalifour Improvement Advisor: Tricia Wilkerson Team Members: Karen Chandler, Kerri Emberlin, Lorraine Skarratt, Anne Swift, Ashlee Taylor, Dana Vladescu and Nicole Z. Schadenberg Problem Statement: Given the high volume of new referrals, our clients (Persons with dementia & Care Partners) don’t have access to access to services in a timely manner. (there are too many accesses to services) Rationale: - We don’t have guidelines on wait times; We don’t currently track wait time (except for BSO program); Best practices for groups: 2 months wait time is acceptable There is no centralized intake process in some of our branches. Aim Statement: By March 31, 2015 there will be a system in place to track when referrals are received and when clients actually access counselling support, education and social program to reduce clients’ wait time by 20%. Measures: Outcome Measure: Clients’ experience, reduced wait times for Alzheimer Society services (# of days), Process Measure: First Link program’s expected response time: 3 business days; LHIN’s expectation re: our response time: 5 business days. Balancing Measure: Track services that clients are seeking from the Alzheimer Society and their availability. Root Causes of the Problem: Change Ideas: Anticipated Barriers and Mitigation Strategies: Anticipated Timeline Key Milestones Resources Required: Signatures: Executive Sponsor: _______________________________ Project Lead: __________________________________

Title: Project Title Scope/Boundaries: Indicate the beginning and end steps and the process being focused on Team List the names and positions for: Executive Sponsor (someone on senior management who will be accountable at a senior level, will remove barriers, ensure adequate resources are provided, etc) Project Lead (Person accountable for accountable for leadership of the project team and accountable for day-to-day project progress) Process Owner (often the same person as the Project Lead; a person who is in a management position and is accountable for the process being improved; Improvement Advisor (Someone who does not necessarily have content expertise, but provides and builds QI expertise in the team; for this Learning Collaborative, the Project Lead will also be the Improvement Advisor, supported by an External Coach. Team Members (Ensure the team includes ndividuals from the front line who are most familiar with the process , and where possible, “suppliers” and “customers” who may be impacted through inputs to or outputs from the process) Aim Statement: Articulate your project aim stating “How much” (amount of improvement – eg 30%) , “by when” (a month and year), “as measured by” (needs to reflect service delivery improvement that will directly impact clients) Problem Statement: . What is the problem and what parts of the organization does it impact/touch? . Why is this important to the organization? Is it linked to a strategic priority? . Is there data or other evidence that helps to highlight the problem? Measures: Include a Family of Measures: . Outcome Measures (at least one) . Process Measures (at least one per change idea) . Balancing Measures (at least one) Root Causes of the Problem: How were they identified? Include any available evidence. Change Ideas: What are they? What is the hypothesized relationship between the root causes and the change ideas? Is there evidence in the literature or elsewhere for the relationship? Anticipated Barriers and Mitigation Strategies: Anticipated Timeline Over how many months will the project be conducted? If possible, specify start date by month and year, and end date by month and year Key Milestones: Identify key points over the project duration at which time you anticipate key deliverables/results Resources Required: Budget, Dedicated Staff Time for Project Lead and for Team members. Signatures: Signals that these individuals have read the Charter and are aware of the project focus, and at minimum, commit to and agree with the design, set up, and resource requirements at the early stages. Executive Sponsor: _______________________________ Project Lead: __________________________________