Effects on 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHARP trial Study of Heart and Renal Protection : a randomised placebo-controlled trial The e ff ects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus.
Advertisements

Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov.
Baseline characteristics and eligibility criteria of participating trials Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators Lancet 2005;366:
Date of download: 6/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Homocysteine-Lowering With Folic Acid.
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 355, Issue 9212, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 383, Issue 9928, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (September 2013)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Volume 376, Issue 9734, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 373, Issue 9679, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 388, Issue 10059, Pages (November 2016)
SEARCH Collaborative Group. Lancet 2010;epub 9 Nov
Long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy
Neonatal vitamin A: time to move on?
Volume 378, Issue 9804, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 388, Issue 10059, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 366, Issue 9503, Pages (December 2005)
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
Volume 376, Issue 9734, Pages (July 2010)
Long-term effects of hormone replacement therapy
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Aspirin in the prevention of cancer – Author's reply
George E. Kikano, MD, Marie T. Brown, MD  Mayo Clinic Proceedings 
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Volume 373, Issue 9679, Pages (June 2009)
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta- analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials 
Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised.
Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies  Prospective Studies Collaboration  The.
Thomas F. O’Donnell, MD, Joseph Lau, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Volume 386, Issue 10001, Pages (October 2015)
Jacques Irani  European Urology Supplements 
Volume 379, Issue 9822, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 386, Issue 10001, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 375, Issue 9725, Pages (May 2010)
Yousef Rezaei, MD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Infant-feeding patterns and HIV-1 transmission
Volume 376, Issue 9753, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 371, Issue 9627, Pages (May 2008)
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials  Cholesterol.
Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials 
Volume 382, Issue 9894, Pages (August 2013)
C-reactive protein concentration and the vascular benefits of statin therapy: an analysis of 20 536 patients in the Heart Protection Study  Heart Protection.
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (September 2013)
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group Lancet 2011;377:469-76
Volume 383, Issue 9928, Pages (May 2014)
Department of Error The Lancet Volume 369, Issue 9564, (March 2007)
Volume 375, Issue 9719, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 379, Issue 9822, Pages (March 2012)
Cause of death Treatment-arm events, % (n=45 054)
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 381, Issue 9871, Pages (March 2013)
Relative Risk of Myopathy Associated with Selected Baseline Characteristics among 6031 Participants Assigned to 80 mg of Simvastatin Daily in SEARCH The.
Impact of renal function on the effects of LDL cholesterol lowering with statin-based regimens: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28.
Volume 368, Issue 9541, Pages (September 2006)
Relative Risk of Onset of Cancer from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Meta-Analysis of Statin Trials, According to Year of Onset Risk ratios.
Risk of having any adverse effects with supplements compared with placebo. Risk of having any adverse effects with supplements compared with placebo. Stratified.
Presentation transcript:

Effects on 11-year mortality and morbidity of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin for about 5 years in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised controlled trial  Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group  The Lancet  Volume 378, Issue 9808, Pages 2013-2020 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 First major vascular event during in-trial and post-trial follow-up Analyses are of numbers of participants having a first post-randomisation event of each type during follow-up, so there is some non-additivity between different types of event. Denominators during the post-trial period are the numbers of randomised patients who had not had the particular outcome or died during the in-trial period. Risk ratios (RRs) are plotted (black squares with area proportional to amount of statistical information in each subdivision) comparing outcome among the participants allocated 40 mg simvastatin daily to that among those allocated placebo, along with their 95% CIs (horizontal lines; ending with arrow head when CI extends beyond scale). For particular subtotals and totals, the result and its 95% CI are represented by a diamond, with the relative risk reduction (and 95% CI) and statistical significance given alongside. A broken vertical line indicates the overall RR. The Lancet 2011 378, 2013-2020DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 First major vascular event by year during in-trial and post-trial follow-up Conventions as in figure 1. Denominators are the numbers of patients at risk of a first post-randomisation major vascular event at the start of each year. The Lancet 2011 378, 2013-2020DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 First major vascular event during total follow-up period Life-table plot of the effects of simvastatin allocation on percentage of major vascular events during the in-trial and post-trial periods. The Lancet 2011 378, 2013-2020DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Vascular and non-vascular mortality during in-trial and post-trial follow-up Conventions as in figure 1. The Lancet 2011 378, 2013-2020DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 First incident cancer by year during total follow-up period Conventions as in figure 1. The Lancet 2011 378, 2013-2020DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Incidence of site-specific cancer during total follow-up period Conventions as in figure 1. Not including non-melanoma skin cancer, which was prospectively to be considered separately (561 [5·5%] vs 512 [5·0%]; risk ratio 1·08 [0·96–1·21]; p=0·22). The Lancet 2011 378, 2013-2020DOI: (10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61125-2) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions