Improving Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) Inspections:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup: Roadmap Charge Overview Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.
Advertisements

2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Supervisors.
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
2015 Point In Time Count: Broward County CoC Plan to End Homelessness
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Performance Monitoring All All Contracts require basic monitoring once awarded. The Goal of contract monitoring is to ensure that the contract is satisfactorily.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
MNSAA Accreditation January 2014 New School Training The Whole Learning School Sarah W. Mueller Executive Director.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
VPPPA Mentoring Program. The VPPPA Mentoring Program is a formal process to assist companies and facilities interested in participating in the Voluntary.
NRC Leadership Expectations and Practices for Sustaining a High Performing Organization NRC Commissioner William C. Ostendorff FR/SSO/FS Workshop U.S.
Doug Bellomo April 6, NFDA Retreat & Conference “Risk MAP--Foundation, Transition, Integration” Risk MAP: An Update to NFDA.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
Overview Lifting the Curtain - Debriefings FAI Acquisition Seminar.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
Workshop 2 – Administrative Structure Recycled Water Feasibility Study Rancho Murieta Community Services District January 8, 2008.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Redesigning FSIS Outreach to Meet Current Needs of Small and Very Small Plants.
Safety in Construction Contracts Presented By: Ramy besaiso Instructor : Eng: Eyad Haddad Chapter 10.
Office of State Fire Marshal Oregon State Police Creating Opportunities For Improvement In Preparedness And Response Community Capability Assessment.
CAA Program Reporting Clarification Regarding Federally-Reportable Violations for Clean Air Act Stationary Sources (March 2010) (FRV Clarification Memo)
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Part 265: Data Collection and Reporting.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
DoD Lead Agent: Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Environment) Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
BSEE BAST Determination Process Joseph Levine National Ocean Industries Association 2016 Annual Meeting April 22, 2016 Washington, D.C “To promote safety,
Prepared by: Adam Pugh May 10-12, 2016 FIMS/RE Annual Training.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Minnesota Public Listening Sessions: WIOA Draft Plan Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Hanson Willis Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
General Operations Limitation on Use of Funds Termination of Assistance Other Program Requirements.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence (VPP CX) Capability for the Department.
BLM Decision Making Process
Michael Lindsay, ICF International
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Uniform Physical Condition Standards for the Voucher Program (UPCS-V)
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Making the Most of Your Debriefing
Anna Preston Vance, HA of Paris
Accreditation Canada Medicine Accreditation 2016.
Organizational Performance Self Assessments at DOI
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Self-Assessment How many times, during the course of your IRS career, have you prepared a self-assessment and shared it with your manager as part of the.
Logistics Solutions for the Warfighter
Roadmap to COR.
Prime Contractor Performance
Data Quality 101: What is Data Quality
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
An Update of COSO’s Internal Control–Integrated Framework
Urban Engineers ISO 9001:2015 General Overview
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
CCRPI Overview and FAQs
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Agenda Introductions What is a Unified Shelter Model?
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
System Safety Regulation
System Safety Regulation
Section 3 FOR HUD USE ONLY.
Presentation transcript:

Improving Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) Inspections: National Standards for the Physical Inspection of Real Estate (NSPIRE) Leading Age - May 13, 2019

Overview “The Problem” Inspection Task Force Current protocol efforts The NSPIRE model NSPIRE demonstration

The Problem While a significant majority of HUD and HUD-assisted properties are safe and in a quality condition, a new inspection model is needed to expediently address properties that are not. Issues include: Inspections do not always identify the extent of health and safety conditions affecting residents Properties can pass inspection even with poor unit conditions Scoring model no longer aligns with expectations about housing quality Some owners preparing for inspections, rather than performing maintenance year-round Deficiencies are not all Critical to Quality (CTQ)

Inspection Task Force Mission Conduct a wholesale reexamination of REAC inspections Place the greatest emphasis on eliminating health and safety hazards Ensure owners adopt sound maintenance practices year-round

2 Track Approach Track 1 – Immediate Changes to the Current System 14 Day Notice Eliminating the Reverse Auction Program Carbon Monoxide Survey Track 2 – Complete Review and Overhaul of the Inspection Process

14 Calendar Day Inspection Notification Achieves a more accurate picture of how the property is being maintained year-round Reduces significant costs spent for inspection preparation and promotes reinvestment into the property year-round General Concept Property notified 14 calendar days before the inspection Unless state or local law requires a longer resident notification window If property cancels, the score will be a zero One additional reinspection within 7 calendar days; otherwise, score held at zero Notice Released Feb 22, 2019; Effective March 25, 2019 https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/PIH/documents/PIH-2019-02.pdf First auction contracts under new policy just recently awarded

Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detector Survey HUD/REAC Inspector Notice 2019-01 requires survey for CO detectors in buildings/units with fuel-fired appliances or connected garages. Units in States Not Requiring CO Detector Units in States Requiring CO Detector Total Missing 483 2034 2517 Working 205 4191 4396 Not Working 28 243 271 Number of Inspections: 1019 Number with CO source: 366 * As of April 24, 2019

Goals of NSPIRE Demonstration Ensure families are living in decent and safe housing Enhance accuracy through: Better identification of substandard properties Increased objectivity and defensibility of inspections Streamlined inspection processes

Demonstration Notice Released Initiate New Scoring Model NSPIRE Timeline NSPIRE: New Standards, Protocols, and Processes Demonstration Notice Released Demonstration Listening Sessions Initiate POA Self-Inspections Initiate Contractor Inspections Initiate Government Inspections Initiate New Scoring Model Stakeholder Outreach FY2019 Analysis & Design FY2021 Demonstration Execution: Test, Evaluate, Validate & Refine 14 Day Notice Released 14 Day Notice Effective Reverse Auction Program Replacement FY2020 Changes To Current Process

NSPIRE Demonstration Phasing Plan 1st Self-Inspection Collected 1st NSPIRE Inspections Conducted to Test Standards First Scores Generated Advisory Scores and TA Continue Q3FY19 Q4FY19 Q1FY20 Q2FY20 Q3FY20 Q4FY20 Q1-Q4FY21 10/1/2021 10/1/2019 4/1/2020 7/1/2020 1/1/2020 Interim Rule Published Interim Rule Effective; Final Standards & Scoring Published Demonstration Official Start 7/1/2019 4/1/2019 10/1/2020 Validated NSPIRE Standards Listening Sessions Completed Significant Milestones Onboard Region 3 R 6 R 5 R 4 R 1&2 R 9&10 Draft NSPIRE Stnds

NSPIRE Model - Conceptual View 3 Types of Inspections – Confidence Increased Property Owner/Agent (POA) Self-Inspections REAC Contracted Inspections HUD Quality Assurance Inspections 3 Categories of Deficiencies – Resident Focused Safety and Health Function and Operability Condition and Appearance 3 Inspectable Areas – Complexity Reduced Unit Inside Outside 3 Inspectable Areas 3 Categories of Deficiencies 3 Types of Inspections NSPIRE Model Underpinned by 3 mutually supporting components

NSPIRE: 3 Types of Inspections POA Self-Inspections Who: Property Owners/Management What: All deficiencies reported to HUD When: Once a year Where: All units Why: To gain a reasonable level of confidence in results & To ensure work orders are being generated Reasonable assurance into property’s condition REAC Contracted Inspections Who: Contract Inspectors What: CTQs When: Periodic inspections (3, 2, 1 years) Where: High sample rate Why: To gain a high level of confidence in results Evidentiary support to enforcement and/or sanctions HUD Federal Employee Inspections Who: HUD Federal Inspectors What: CTQs++ When: Triggered by poor conditions Where: Highest sample rate Why: To gain the highest level of confidence in results *CTQs = Critical to Quality Indicators; Inspection standards that have a high correlation to quality

NSPIRE: 3 Categories of Deficiencies Precision CTQs Per Category Response Level Safety & Health Function & Operability Condition & Appearance Urgent: Emergency Work Order Objective Planned: Routine Work Order Subjective Programmed: Discretionary Maintenance

NSPIRE: 3 Inspectable Areas Dwelling Units 35% Building Systems 20% Common Areas 15% Site Building Exterior 50% Inside 25% Outside Property won’t pass overall inspection if the Dwelling Units inspectable area fails. CURRENT 5 INSPECTABLE AREAS NEW 3 INSPECTABLE AREAS Failure Threshold Value 5 Inspectable areas will feed into the 3 new inspectable areas Simplified, intuitive approach based on the inspectable item’s physical location

Demonstration

Demonstration Roadmap Multi-year, multi-phase effort consisting of: Demonstration preparation – Currently ongoing Finalize strategy (vision, goals, objectives) Develop items to be evaluated (elements of NSPIRE to include new deficiencies) Develop test criteria and metrics Compare results with criteria and adjust accordingly Solicitation and selection of properties (Preference to Region III) Phase I – POA self-inspections - Begins in 3rd Quarter FY2019 Leverages existing requirement to conduct annual unit inspections Participants will inspect and submit results to HUD Self-inspections evaluated but not scored Phase II – CTQ inspections - Begins in 4th Quarter FY2019 Comprised of contractor and government employees using new standards Assesses new standards and protocols Development of new scoring model

Demonstration Inspection Scoring Properties will be inspected during the 2-year Demonstration Demonstration inspections will be “in lieu” of UPCS inspections Scores are only advisory If conditions warrant, HUD will reinspect using UPCS

Summary Changes needed to protect families and ensure the inspection results reflect the property’s true physical condition Changes will be tested during a 2-year demonstration  Feedback will be collected from stakeholders through listening sessions and other methods of outreach Demonstration expected beginning Q3 FY19

NSPIRE@hud.gov or Search on “HUD NSPIRE” Your feedback… Questions & Comments NSPIRE@hud.gov or Search on “HUD NSPIRE”