Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Advertisements

Constitutively Active β-Catenin Confers Multilineage Differentiation Potential on Lymphoid and Myeloid Progenitors  Yoshihiro Baba, Karla P. Garrett,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Characterization and quantification of clonal heterogeneity among hematopoietic stem cells: a model-based approach by Ingo Roeder, Katrin Horn, Hans-Bernd.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
The Chemokine Receptor CXCR4 Is Required for the Retention of B Lineage and Granulocytic Precursors within the Bone Marrow Microenvironment  Qing Ma,
Myung Jin Son, Kevin Woolard, Do-Hyun Nam, Jeongwu Lee, Howard A. Fine 
Francesca Ficara, Mark J. Murphy, Min Lin, Michael L. Cleary 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Cited2 Is an Essential Regulator of Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Stimulate Hematopoietic Progenitors by Promoting Cytokine Release from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells  Christian M. Schürch,
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Early production of human neutrophils and platelets posttransplant is severely compromised by growth factor exposure  Paul H. Miller, David J.H.F. Knapp,
HOXB4-Induced Expansion of Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells Ex Vivo
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Mark J. Kiel, Melih Acar, Glenn L. Radice, Sean J. Morrison 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 154, Issue 5, Pages (August 2013)
Quantitation of Human Cells that Produce Neutrophils and Platelets in Vivo Obtained from Normal Donors Treated with Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor.
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Evolution of the Cancer Stem Cell Model
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Genotypic and functional diversity of phenotypically defined primitive hematopoietic cells in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia  Ivan Sloma, Philip.
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Imaging Hematopoietic Precursor Division in Real Time
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Masayuki Yamashita, Eriko Nitta, Toshio Suda  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Casey Brewer, Elizabeth Chu, Mike Chin, Rong Lu  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Heterogeneity Takes Center Stage
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes dormant hematopoietic stem cells without proliferation in mice by Jeffrey M. Bernitz, Michael G. Daniel,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 218-229 (August 2007) Long-Term Propagation of Distinct Hematopoietic Differentiation Programs In Vivo  Brad Dykstra, David Kent, Michelle Bowie, Lindsay McCaffrey, Melisa Hamilton, Kristin Lyons, Shang-Jung Lee, Ryan Brinkman, Connie Eaves  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 218-229 (August 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic Representation of the Overall Experimental Design Freshly isolated CD45midlin−Rho−SP cells (158) and 194 in vitro clones (generated from single CD45midlin−Rho−SP cells cultured for 4 days in 300 ng/ml Steel factor, 20 ng/ml IL-11, and 1 ng/ml Flt3-ligand) were transplanted into sublethally irradiated CD45-congenic W41/W41 recipients. At regular intervals posttransplant, WBC samples were analyzed for the presence of donor cells of B cell, T cell, and myeloid (GM) lineages. Six to seven months posttransplant, BM was harvested from 46 positive recipients, and one femur equivalent was injected into each of two secondary sublethally irradiated W41/W41 recipients (total of 96, of which 90 survived). Similarly, BM was harvested from 25 selected secondary recipients at six to seven months posttransplant and injected into pairs of tertiary recipients (total of 46, of which 44 survived). In vitro clones (10 day) were also generated from single CD45midlin−Rho−SP cells, and 18 such clones were injected into groups of two to three sublethally irradiated W41/W41 mice each (total of 48 mice). Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 WBC Outputs in Recipients of Single CD45midlin−Rho−SP Cells or Their Clonal Progeny Generated In Vitro (A) Donor contributions to the total circulating WBCs over time posttransplant shown individually for each of the 93 mice found to be repopulated for at least 16 weeks. (B) Variations in the donor contributions to the total circulating WBCs at 16 weeks posttransplant in mice grouped according to the four patterns of repopulation identified. Each point represents an individual mouse. Horizontal bars indicate mean values. (C) Contribution to the circulating WBCs in mice grouped according to the four patterns of repopulation identified. Shown are the mean ± SEM of values from all mice in each group as defined in the text. (D and E) Examples of individual mice repopulated with freshly isolated cells (D) or cells from 4 day clones generated in vitro (E). (Top panels) Colored areas represent donor WBCs of GM (red), B cell (blue), and T cell (yellow) lineages as a percentage of all WBCs over time posttransplant. Data are stacked such that the sum of each lineage contribution represents the percentage donor contribution to all WBCs. (Bottom panels) For each time point, the separate donor contributions to the GM (red), B cell (blue), and T cell (yellow) lineages are shown as bars, and the percentage donor contribution to the total WBCs is shown as a gray area. (F) Distinct patterns of donor contributions to the GM (red), B cell (blue), and T cell (black/yellow) lineages over time are shown. Shown is the mean ± SEM of values from all mice in each group. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Identification of Subtypes of Repopulating Cells in Ternary Plots of Their Lineage-Specific Contributions at 16 Weeks Posttransplant (A) Comparison of the ratio of donor clone contributions to the GM (up), B lineage (lower left), and T lineage (lower right) WBCs. If a clone were contributing only GM cells, the value would lie at the upper vertex; if only B cells, the value would lie at the left vertex; and if only T cells, the value would lie at the right vertex. If a clone were contributing equally toward all three lineages, the value would lie in the center of the triangle. Greater relative contributions to the GM, B, or T lineages shift the values to the top, lower left, or lower right, respectively. The graph can be divided into three sections based on specific myeloid to lymphoid contribution ratios: high GM:(B + T) = ratio ≥ 2:1; low GM:(B + T) = ratio ≤1:4; balanced GM:(B+T) = ratio between 1:4 and 2:1. (B) Subdivision of the patterns of repopulation obtained according to the ratio of the contributions to the myeloid and lymphoid lineages at 16 weeks posttransplant. α cells display a high GM:(B + T) contribution, β cells display a balanced GM:(B + T) contribution, γ cells display a low GM:(B + T) contribution, and δ cells contribute B cells and/or T cells but not GM cells (<1%) at 16 weeks. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Clonal Propagation of Primary Repopulation Patterns in Secondary and Tertiary Recipients (A) Summary of the repopulation patterns seen in pairs of secondary and tertiary recipients transplanted with the progeny of each of the four original subtypes of repopulating cells. (B) Five examples of serial transplants originating from each of the four subtypes of repopulating cells are shown. Bars represent the percent donor contribution to the GM (red), B cell (blue), and T cell (yellow) lineages at 16 weeks posttransplant in primary, secondary, and tertiary recipients (as indicated). Negative recipients (<1% donor WBCs at 16 weeks posttransplant) are indicated with an asterisk. nd, not done. † indicates that the recipient mouse died before 16 weeks posttransplant. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Intraclonal Comparisons of Long-Term Repopulating Cell Progeny (A) Donor WBC contribution patterns in paired secondary recipients. For each time point, the donor contributions to the GM (red), B cell (blue), and T cell (yellow) lineages are shown as bars, and the donor contribution to the total WBCs is shown as a gray area. (B) Donor WBC contribution patterns in recipients of subdivided 10 day clones. For each time point, the donor contributions to the GM (red), B cell (blue), and T cell (yellow) lineages are shown as bars, and the donor contribution to the total WBCs is shown as a gray area. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Rapid Alteration In Vitro of Repopulating Activities (A) The distribution of α, β, γ, or δ cells identified in freshly isolated CD45midlin−Rho−SP BM cells. (B) The distribution of α, β, γ, or δ cells identified in 4 day clones generated in vitro from freshly isolated CD45midlin−Rho−SP BM cells. (C) The distribution of α, β, γ, or δ cells identified in subdivided 10 day clones generated in vitro from freshly isolated CD45midlin−Rho−SP BM cells. Portions of eight clones were injected into a total of 21 recipients. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Schematic Diagram of the Relationships between Different Subtypes of Repopulating Cells and the Mature WBC Types They Generate The gray box encloses four types of cells with long-term (>16 weeks) repopulating activity. Serial transplant and in vitro data suggest that β, γ, or δ cells form a hierarchy that corresponds to conventional models of HSC differentiation in that the propensity for generating mature myeloid progeny diminishes progressively before multipotential repopulating activity is lost. α cells represent an unusual type of self-renewing cell with long-term repopulating activity in which a strong propensity for myeloid cell output can be independently and exclusively sustained over multiple cycles of hematopoietic repopulation but that also has the potential for conversion to a cell capable of displaying substantial immediate lymphoid repopulating activity. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 218-229DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.015) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions