End-to-End QoS awareness for admission control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /xxxx Submission July 2007 Lei Du, DoCoMo Beijing Labs Slide 1 End-to-End QoS awareness for admission control Date: Authors:
Advertisements

LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
Latency-sensitive Applications - metrics
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
London TGu Motions Authors: January 2007 Date: Month Year
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
3GPP Extended Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Quick Beacon Impacts on LB 92
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
Proposal for User Plane Support for QoS Mapping
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: September 2005
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Limitation of EDCA/HCCA for Video Transmission
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Liaison Report From wng
Secure Network Selection
QoS in WLAN Interworking
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
Limitation of EDCA/HCCA for Video Transmission
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
for video transmission, Status
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Use of KCK for TGr Management Frame Protection
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
Proposal for User Plane Support for QoS Mapping
E911 Bits Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

End-to-End QoS awareness for admission control Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 End-to-End QoS awareness for admission control Date: 2007-07-17 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair stuart@ok-brit.com as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 Abstract This presentation will discuss the End-to-End (E2E) QoS aware admission control scenarios between WLAN and external networks to improve the user satisfaction. Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

Motivation User satisfaction Admission control Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 Motivation User satisfaction - describes how the application is perceived by the end-users. - is determined by E2E QoS parameters as defined in ITU-T G.1010[1], including delay, delay jitter, packet loss rate, etc. ⇒ E2E QoS awareness needs to be considered in WLAN. Admission control - has been used to achieve QoS awareness. - is defined in 802.11e by using ADDTS request/response frame exchange. - takes into account of current traffic status within a BSS or multiple BSSs if the AP switch is deployed. ⇒ E2E QoS aware admission control will improve users satisfaction. [1] ITU-T Rec. G.1010 (11/2001), End-user multimedia QoS categories Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

What is E2E QoS awareness? Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 What is E2E QoS awareness? Conversational Voice: Typical data rate: 4-64kbps One-way delay: <150ms (preferred) <400ms (limit) Delay variation: <1ms Packet Loss rate: <3% E2E QoS Email: Typical data amount: <10 kB One-way delay: several minutes Packet loss rate: 0 STA1 WLAN MT1 SSPN/Internet Per-BSS QoS Cellular Conversational Voice: Typical data rate: 4-64kbps One-way delay: <30ms (preferred) <50ms (limit) Delay variation: <1ms Packet Loss rate: <3% Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

Admission Control Admission Control Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 Admission Control User Authorisation Information (from SSPN) Admission Control Wireless Link (BSS) Traffic Information Control SSPN information: load at other APs or SSPN (how?) Admission control within one BSS is proposed in 802.11e. BUT How does .11e interact with other admission control decisions of external networks? What are the impacts on user experience (source STA/MT and destination STA/MT)? Reference : 11-03-0727-02-0wng-interworking-mac-issues.ppt Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

What’s benefits from E2E QoS aware admission control? (1/2) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 What’s benefits from E2E QoS aware admission control? (1/2) BSS Admission Capacity: Admission capacity will be adaptive to accept or reject additional transmission e.g., Total Delay 200ms SSPN/Internet STA1 MT1 Cellular WLAN Aggregate Delay 70-100ms Tolerable Delay 100-130ms E2E QoS aware admission control can increase/decrease the BSS admission capacity adaptively to meet E2E QoS requirements at the user. Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

What’s benefits from E2E QoS aware admission control? (2/2) Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 What’s benefits from E2E QoS aware admission control? (2/2) WLAN Admission Control Individual Admission Control Cellular Admission Control SSPN/Internet STA1 MT1 QoS parameter setting: Unified QoS parameter setting can be used among heterogeneous access networks. Cellular WLAN e.g., Voice: Access Delay parameter, Data: Packet Error Rate E2E QoS aware Request: PER 3% E2E QoS aware admission control may use an unified QoS aware parameter setting among heterogeneous access networks depending on the traffic classes. This unified parameter setting will improve the end-user satisfaction. Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

Summary and Recommendation Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 Summary and Recommendation E2E QoS aware admission control will Improve user experience in the application layer Adjust the WLAN admission capacity adaptively without violating QoS of ongoing connections. Use unified methodology for E2E QoS parameter setting among heterogeneous access networks to meet end-user satisfaction. Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

Thanks & Questions July 2007 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2007 Straw Poll Should Task Group U receive further presentations of methods supporting E2E QoS aware for admission control? Yes: No: Lei Du, NTT DoCoMo John Doe, Some Company