Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI)
Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.
Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
A Presentation by the Technical Assistance Resource Center (TARC) at New Mexico State University. Updated June 2009.
NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.
Strengthening Probation as the Sanction of Choice In order for Probation to be a meaningful sanction, it must be adequately funded. Probation is the sanction.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
November 3 1.What is an action committed by a juvenile called that would be considered a crime if committed by an adult? a. intake b. truancy c. status.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 2006 National Report Graphs from Chapter 7: Juvenile Offenders in.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Give Your Assessment of the philosophy behind your state’s approach to Judicial Waiver “To provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation.
Understanding the “System”
PRESENTED BY: LORI ALBIN, DIRECTOR FISCAL POLICY CENTER NATIONAL JUVENILE JUSTICE NETWORK How Much Does it Cost to Put Johnny in Jail?
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.
Public Meetings on the Proposed Female Detention Center
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Peeling Back the Data “Onion” Presented by Karen Tucker, Union County DMC Project Coordinator.
Data Analysis and Forecasting Project – Interim Report Delivered to the DJJ January 2008 Jennifer Lewis Priestley, Ph.D. Shan Muthersbaugh, MS Candidate.
Georgia and the American Experience
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.
Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.
Navigating the Juvenile Justice System.  Taxpayers save $2 million for each child who is prevented from beginning a life of crime  20% of teens live.
The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
VOCABULARY. ADJUDICATE  TO HEAR AND SETTLE A CASE BY JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
Juvenile Corrections Population Forecasting Advisory Committee September 1, 2010 DAS Exec. Building 155 Cottage, BAM Conference Torri Lynn (Chair)Linn.
\. 2 Expediting Court Process As bureaucracies advance red-tape bureaucratization tends to develop Opportunities to expedite can occur at various points.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 15: Government of the Empire State Section 3 Judicial Branch ©2005 Clairmont Press.
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
Race and the Relationship to Juvenile Adjudication
Lesson 6: Juvenile Justice (Chapter 15 Section 4)
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Juvenile Justice Reform in Kentucky
Juvenile Justice in Georgia
Juvenile Justice system
Dependency Court Flowchart
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
Overview of the Juvenile Justice System
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
The Juvenile Justice System in Georgia
Wake County Child Welfare EOY Report
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
LESSON OBJECTIVES Unit 4-3: Adjudication in Juvenile Court
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year
Raise the Age Implementation
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
CHAPTER 1 Juvenile Justice: Definitions, Measurements and Process
Juvenile Justice It’s all about you!.
Presentation transcript:

Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017

Prince George's County Juvenile Complaints Have Declined Significantly Prince George's County complaints referred to DJS Intake declined 71.1% in ten years. Statewide complaints declined 56.1% over the same period. Prepared by: DJS Office of Research & Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Juvenile Complaints in Prince George’s County Have Declined for All Race/Ethnicities Since FY07 Complaints for African American youth decreased 73.2%, and declined 70.0% for white youth. African American youth comprise 79.0% of complaints, down from 85.0% in FY07. African American youth comprise 61.9% of the general population. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake in fiscal year. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Percent of Cases Referred to Juvenile Court by Prince George’s County has Declined Over the Past Two Years 47.0% of Prince George's County complaints were referred to court by DJS Intake in FY16, 17.5% more than in FY07. Statewide 48.2% were referred to court. 18.4% of Prince George's County complaints were diverted to an informal DJS pre-court case. Statewide 15.8% were diverted. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, complaints referred to DJS Intake. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Prince George's County Detention Population Has Decline Significantly Prince George's County daily population in DJS detention declined 25.5% in ten years, to 43.6 in FY16. The statewide population declined 39.1% over the same period. Pending Placement population declined 62.6% in ten years. Cases detained for the Adult Court now make up 16.5% of the DJS detained population in Prince George's County. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, detention admissions for Prince George's County youth. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Prince George's County Youth Population In Detention Pre-Disposition Has Declined Significantly The Prince George's County juvenile pre-dispositional detained population declined 15.3% in ten years to 26 youth in FY 2016. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Prince George’s County Pre-Disposition Detention Placements Have Decreased for Most Complaint Types Youth detained pending disposition for misdemeanors has decreased 23% over ten years. Youth detained pending disposition for crimes of violence has increased 6% over ten years.

Crimes of Violence Make Up an Increasing Proportion of Detention Placement Offenses The proportion of youth detained pre-disposition for Crimes of Violence complaints has increased 14 percentage points over ten years. The detained population is increasingly comprised of youth with violent crimes complaints.

Detention Placements for Non-Violent Felonies are Declining The proportion of youth detained pre-disposition for Non-Violent Felony complaints has decreased 15 percentage points over ten tears. The detained population is increasingly comprised of youth with violent crimes complaints.

Prince George’s County Pre-D Detention Population

Prince George's County Youth In Detention Pending a Committed Placement Has Declined Dramatically Juvenile court pending placement population declined 62.6% in ten years to 10.4 youth in FY16. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Prince George's County Juvenile Probation and Commitment Orders Have Declined Prince George's County Juvenile probation orders declined 57.6% in ten years. Statewide probation orders declined 51.9% over the same period. Prince George's County juvenile commitments declined 28% in ten years. Statewide commitments declined 48.2% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, legal action tables. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Average Committed Out of Home Population Has Declined Significantly in Prince George’s County Overall daily population of Prince George's County youth committed by the juvenile court to out of home placement decreased 14.6% over ten years, from 124.0 in FY07 to 105.9 in FY16. Statewide average committed population declined 39.1% over the same period. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed program admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

Prince George's County Committed Youth Population Has Decreased for All Facility Types Overall committed Out-of- Home population has decreased 14.6% since FY07. DJS-Operated ADP increased 66.7%, and Private In-State decreased 38.6% since FY07. Out of State committed average population declined from the high of 33 in FY15, to 18 in FY16. Data Source: DJS ASSIST, committed facility admissions. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Low-Level Offenses Has Declined The proportion of new commitments for misdemeanor and other low-level offenses declined over ten years. The proportion of new commitments for violations of probation has remained flat in the last year.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence has Increased in Prince George’s County Crimes of Violence made up nearly 40% of new commitments in FY 2016. The rate of juveniles committed for Non-Violent Felonies has decreased over the past two years.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Crimes of Violence has Increased in Prince George’s County Crimes of Violence make up nearly 40% of new commitments in FY 2016 in Prince George’s County.

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Non-Violent Felonies has Decreased in Prince George’s County

The Rate of Juveniles Committed for Violations of Probation has Declined in Prince George’s County After increasing from FY 2012 through FY 2014, the rate of new commitments for Violations of Probation has decreased 4 percentage points over the past two years.

Recidivism Rates Prince George's County DJS Committed Youth Have Declined in Recent Years 6.8% of Prince George's County youth released from committed placement in FY15 had a new offense within a year that resulted in a delinquent adjudication or criminal conviction, a decrease of 4.9 percentage points from FY14. The Statewide rate was 16.7% in FY15, down 4.1 points from FY14. Data Source: DJS Data Resource Guide FY2015. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions

Recidivism Rates for Prince George's County DJS Probation Youth Have Declined in The Past Year 7.1% of Prince George's County youth placed on probation for the first time in FY15 had a new offense within a year that resulted in a delinquent adjudication or criminal conviction, a decrease of 2.1 percentage points from FY14. The Statewide rate was 17.6% in FY15, down 1.4 points from FY14. Data Source: DJS Data Resource Guide FY2015. Prepared by: Office of Research and Evaluation Data Source: DJS ASSIST, and CJIS for adult convictions