Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages (July 1996)
Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Crystal Structure of Chicken γS-Crystallin Reveals Lattice Contacts with Implications for Function in the Lens and the Evolution of the βγ-Crystallins 
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages (August 1995)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Solution structure of a pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplex containing T·AT, C+ ·GC and G·TA triples  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure 
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Structure of a putative ancestral protein encoded by a single sequence repeat from a multidomain proteinase inhibitor gene fromNicotiana alata  Martin.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Jie Ji, Michael E Hogan, Xiaolian Gao  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Unique G-Quadruplex Scaffold Adopted by a Guanosine-Rich Human Intronic Sequence  Vitaly Kuryavyi, Dinshaw J. Patel  Structure 
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Solution Structure of the Cyclotide Palicourein
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
The 1.5 Å Crystal Structure of a Prokaryote Serpin
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages (December 1997)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Andrey V Kajava, Gilbert Vassart, Shoshana J Wodak  Structure 
Tertiary structure of an immunoglobulin-like domain from the giant muscle protein titin: a new member of the I set  Mark Pfuhl, Annalisa Pastore  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 195-209 (February 1996) Structure and multiple conformations of the Kunitz-type domain from human type VI collagen α3(VI) chain in solution  Markus Zweckstetter, Michael Czisch, Ulrike Mayer, Mon-Li Chu, Wolfgang Zinth, Rupert Timpl, Tad A Holak  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 195-209 (February 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6

Figure 1 The amino-acid sequence of recombinant domain C5 and a survey of the NMR data used for locating secondary structure elements. The NOEs (|i–j|<5), classified as weak, weak-medium, medium, strong, and very strong, are represented by the heights of the bars and were extracted from the NOESY spectra with mixing times of 46 ms. The Hα(i)–Hδ(i+1) (Pro) NOEs are shown in dark grey along the same line as the Hα(i)–HN(i+1) connectivities. Hα(i)–HN(i+1) connectivities which could not unambiguously be identified due to overlap are marked by white bars. Filled circles indicate HNs that did not exchange against D2O after 6 h; open circles indicate HNs that did exchange after 3 months at pH 4.3. The values of the JCαH−NH coupling constants (in Hz) are indicated below the sequence and the disulfide bridges above. The chemical shift indices (CSI) of Hα protons are defined in [35]. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 2 The HN–Hα region of the 2D NOESY spectrum of domain C5, recorded at pH 6.2, 30°C and with a mixing time of 150 ms. Intraresidual peaks are marked in blue, inter-residual NOEs in red, and connectivities involving minor conformations in green. NOEs between non-exchangeable protein protons and hydration water molecules are indicated by the pink dot and circle. The Hα–HN cross peaks of Glu17 and Tyr41, which are very weak in this spectrum, are highlighted by a square. Intraresidual HN–Hα NOEs are labeled with one-letter abbreviations and inter-residual cross peaks are indicated by two numbers. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 3 Schematic diagram of the secondary structure elements in domain C5. Numbered circles represent the amino acids in the sequence. The colour of the circles indicates the type of amino acid: green for hydrophobic, light grey for polar, red for charged residues and yellow for cysteines. Red cylinders indicate the position of α helices; the green arrows represent the observed NOE connectivities that define the β sheet. Hydrogen bonds observed at pH 4.3 and 30°C are indicated by dashed lines. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 4 Diagonal plot of the interproton-distance constraints used as input in the structure calculations. Backbone–backbone interactions (squares) are plotted above the diagonal; backbone–side-chain (circles) and side-chain–side-chain (triangles) constraints are shown below the diagonal. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 5 3D structure of domain C5. (a) Ribbon drawing of domain C5. Helices are marked in red, β strands in green and disulfide bridges in yellow. (The figure was generated by the program SETOR [59].) (b) Stereoview of the backbone atoms (N, Cα, C, O) of domain C5 structures best fitted to the N, Cα, and C atoms of all residues located in secondary structure elements (8–13, 22–31, 34–42, 50–51, 53–61). (The figure was generated by the program WHAT IF [60].) (c) Stereo picture of the Cα tracing of one of the C5 structures with the side chains of all the final structures shown. Side chains important for the protein core formation have been marked in green (hydrophobic residues), magenta (polar residues) and yellow (disulfide bridges). Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 5 3D structure of domain C5. (a) Ribbon drawing of domain C5. Helices are marked in red, β strands in green and disulfide bridges in yellow. (The figure was generated by the program SETOR [59].) (b) Stereoview of the backbone atoms (N, Cα, C, O) of domain C5 structures best fitted to the N, Cα, and C atoms of all residues located in secondary structure elements (8–13, 22–31, 34–42, 50–51, 53–61). (The figure was generated by the program WHAT IF [60].) (c) Stereo picture of the Cα tracing of one of the C5 structures with the side chains of all the final structures shown. Side chains important for the protein core formation have been marked in green (hydrophobic residues), magenta (polar residues) and yellow (disulfide bridges). Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 5 3D structure of domain C5. (a) Ribbon drawing of domain C5. Helices are marked in red, β strands in green and disulfide bridges in yellow. (The figure was generated by the program SETOR [59].) (b) Stereoview of the backbone atoms (N, Cα, C, O) of domain C5 structures best fitted to the N, Cα, and C atoms of all residues located in secondary structure elements (8–13, 22–31, 34–42, 50–51, 53–61). (The figure was generated by the program WHAT IF [60].) (c) Stereo picture of the Cα tracing of one of the C5 structures with the side chains of all the final structures shown. Side chains important for the protein core formation have been marked in green (hydrophobic residues), magenta (polar residues) and yellow (disulfide bridges). Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 6 Rms deviations by residue in C5. (a) Residue-based rms deviations of the atomic coordinates among the 20 SA structures for the backbone atoms (solid line) and the non-hydrogen side chain atoms (dashed line). (b) Residue-based rms deviations of the backbone φ (dashed line), ψ (dotted line) and χ (solid line) torsion angles for the 20 SA structures. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 6 Rms deviations by residue in C5. (a) Residue-based rms deviations of the atomic coordinates among the 20 SA structures for the backbone atoms (solid line) and the non-hydrogen side chain atoms (dashed line). (b) Residue-based rms deviations of the backbone φ (dashed line), ψ (dotted line) and χ (solid line) torsion angles for the 20 SA structures. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 7 Stereoview of the backbone atoms of the domain C5 structures with the misfolded chain for residues 17–19 best fitted to N, Cα, and C atoms of residues 8–13, 22–31, 34–42, 50–51 and 53–61. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 8 Ribbon plot of domain C5 showing the parts of the protein which exhibit multiple conformations (yellow) or in which the spin systems of the residues were only observed at and below 15°C (lilac). The unstructured N- and C-terminal residues are colored in red. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)

Figure 9 HN–HN region of the 2D ROESY spectrum of domain C5 recorded at pH 4.3, 30°C and with a mixing time of 45 ms. Intraresidual HN–HN diagonal peaks of the major conformation are marked in blue; intraresidual HN–HN peaks of the minor conformations are displayed in green; exchange peaks between the major and minor conformations are indicated in red. Structure 1996 4, 195-209DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00022-6)