Growth Measure Pilot: Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 10, 2013 Report on the Virginia Early Warning System (VEWS) Education Commission of the States June 27, 2013 Virginia Department of Education.
Advertisements

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Data Source: Virginia School Report Cards / Date: Data as of September 2012.
How Are You Testing Me? LEP Assessment Requirements VATD Conference November 1, 2007 Richmond, Virginia.
ALTERNATE/ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS VGLA AND VMAST UPDATES VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST Regional Administrators Update Training.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Growth Measure Professional Development: Introduction Virginia Department of Education November 2011.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
99th Percentile 1st Percentile 50th Percentile What Do Percentiles Mean? Percentiles express the percentage of students that fall below a certain score.
How to Interpret and Use Standards of Learning (SOL) and ACCESS for ELLs® Data to Make Instructional Decisions for English Learners.
Today’s website:
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
Linking Systems: State, District, School, Classroom: The Virginia Project Chairs: Nancy Protheroe, Center on Innovation & Improvement Kathleen Smith, Virginia.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Copyright ©2006. Battelle for Kids. Understanding & Using Value-Added Analysis.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
Teacher Evaluation and Virginia Performance-Pay Incentives (VPPI) Pilot Presentation to the Virginia School Board Association November 17, 2011 Mark R.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
Office of School Improvement Updates Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary December 3, 2012.
VDOE Updates VESA Meeting October 1, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Assessing the Educational Benefit for Students with IEPs A Sharing of a New Professional Opportunity 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT
Data Source: Virginia School Report Cards Date: Data as of September 2009 Note: The Virginia Assessment Program includes.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
Standards of Learning 2007 All Students Action Achievement Accountability ■■ Fairfax County Public Schools Department of Accountability Comparisons: Fairfax.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Using EVAAS to Make Data- Driven Decisions Clay County School April 20, 2012 Jan King Professional Development Consultant, NCDPI.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Annual Assessment and Accountability Meeting Updates
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Next steps to greatness: Blue ribbon bound
President, Virginia Board of Education
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
2016 State Assessment Highlights
Preliminary Review of the 2012 Math SOL Results
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Student Growth Measurements and Accountability
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
KY Alternate Assessment
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
California's Accountability System
Academic Growth Model Indicator Update
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
Academically or Intellectually Gifted Strategic Plan
Alternative Learning Experiences
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Next Steps for Oregon’s Focus Schools Summer 2013
CORE Academic Growth Model: Step-By-Step
CORE Academic Growth Model: Step-By-Step
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Virginia Department of Education’s Update on Special Education Regional Program Funding
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Student Assessment Updates
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
Discussion on Virginia’s State Assessment Program
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Virginia Board of Education’s
Presentation transcript:

Growth Measure Pilot: Update Presentation to the Joint Committee on the Future of Public Education May 8, 2017

2016 Appropriations Act G.1. Out of this appropriation, $500,000 the first year is provided from the general fund for a pilot program to provide personalized instructional and academic planning for students, facilitate data-driven school improvement efforts, and support the state's accountability and accreditation systems.

Overview of the Pilot In response to the 2016 General Assembly action, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued to establish a contract to pilot a statistical student growth model using state assessment data in reading and mathematics.

Overview of the Pilot Two contracts were awarded on December 27, 2016. Two independent projects are underway. The pilot and contracts will end by June 2017.

(Required a VDOE Restricted Use Data Agreement with each contractor) Overview of the Pilot Contractors will: Use statewide longitudinal assessment data to develop a growth measure in reading and mathematics for use in school and division accountability. Includes four years (2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16) of assessment data: Standards of Learning (SOL) test results from grades 3-8 and end-of-course reading and mathematics tests Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) test results from grades 3-8 and high school reading and mathematics tests Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) test results from grades 3-8 reading tests (Required a VDOE Restricted Use Data Agreement with each contractor)

Overview of the Pilot Contractors will: Produce growth reports in reading and mathematics for the eight schools and school divisions participating in the pilot and the state (eight school reports, eight division reports, and one state report). Develop and deliver training materials to participating schools and divisions that address: the specific growth measure and how educators may interpret the growth measure reports.

Participating Divisions and Schools Region Division Name School Name 1 HENRICO COUNTY LAKESIDE ELEMENTARY 2 VIRGINIA BEACH CITY BRANDON MIDDLE 3 KING WILLIAM COUNTY ACQUINTON ELEMENTARY 4 FAUQUIER COUNTY JAMES G. BRUMFIELD ELEMENTARY 5 STAUNTON CITY SHELBURNE MIDDLE 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY BOONES MILL ELEMENTARY 7 RADFORD CITY BELLE HETH ELEMENTARY 8 LUNENBURG COUNTY LUNENBURG MIDDLE

Current Status of the Pilot Contractors started work in January 2017 to review Virginia assessment data and develop their proposed growth measure for the pilot. Each contractor developed and provided growth measure reports to the eight schools and school divisions. Training materials were developed by each contractor and training sessions with pilot schools divisions are underway. Training is being delivered via webinar.

Role of the Participating Schools and Divisions Participate in the training sessions and review the provided growth reports Provide feedback to the Department regarding each contractor’s growth measure as it relates to accountability, each contractor’s training, and any concerns and questions. All feedback from schools and divisions is welcomed.

Why Measure Growth? Considering both achievement and growth may provide a more complete picture of student learning. Achievement – Did students pass the statewide tests? Growth – Did students demonstrate progress based on where they started the school year?

Proposed Growth Measures The proposed growth measures considered students’ prior achievement on SOL tests and the performance of similar students Statistical predictions were developed for how each student would score on the current year’s test (predicted score) based on the student’s performance on the previous year’s test. A student’s growth was then determined by whether the student fell below, met, or exceeded the predicted score and by how much.

An Example… After the statewide assessments are administered, the data are used to calculate a statistical prediction for each student based on his or her characteristics and similar students across Virginia.

An Example… Students’ actual scores and predicted scores are compared to determine whether each student met or exceeded the prediction and by how much. Student 1: Student 2:

Proposed Growth Measures Growth results for a school could be determined by considering whether, on average, the school’s students tended to exceed or not meet their predictions and by how much

Current Status Staff in each of the pilot schools and school divisions are reviewing their growth reports and participating in training and coaching sessions with each contractor. Department staff will hold feedback sessions with each participating school and division to conclude the pilot. School divisions will provide feedback to the Department regarding each contractor’s growth measure as it relates to accountability, each contractor’s training, and any concerns and questions.

Evaluation of Piloted Growth Approaches Transparency Can it be replicated by school divisions? Understandable How are predicted scores determined? Supportive of instructional decisions Timing of Growth Measure Results Proposed measures would be calculated and prepared after all spring tests are completed One contractor required 6 weeks; one contractor required 2 to 3 weeks

Potential Actions Explore other growth models Consider best practice models for reports provided to schools and divisions Consider cost for statewide implementation Recurring annual expense for calculation of growth measure Training of school division staff

Questions?