Heidi S. Bretscher, Donald T. Fox  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 
MK-8776, a novel Chk1 inhibitor, exhibits an improved radiosensitizing effect compared to UCN-01 by exacerbating radiation-induced aberrant mitosis  Motofumi.
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Vicki P. Losick, Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling  Current Biology 
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Tissue Repair through Cell Competition and Compensatory Cellular Hypertrophy in Postmitotic Epithelia  Yoichiro Tamori, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
The Survivin-like C. elegans BIR-1 Protein Acts with the Aurora-like Kinase AIR-2 to Affect Chromosomes and the Spindle Midzone  Elizabeth K. Speliotes,
Flies without Centrioles
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e3 (September 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
DFezf/Earmuff Maintains the Restricted Developmental Potential of Intermediate Neural Progenitors in Drosophila  Mo Weng, Krista L. Golden, Cheng-Yu Lee 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
The Shortest Telomere, Not Average Telomere Length, Is Critical for Cell Viability and Chromosome Stability  Michael T Hemann, Margaret A Strong, Ling-Yang.
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
In Vivo Analysis of Centromeric Proteins Reveals a Stem Cell-Specific Asymmetry and an Essential Role in Differentiated, Non-proliferating Cells  Ana.
The Telomere Bouquet Controls the Meiotic Spindle
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
The Snail Family Member Worniu Is Continuously Required in Neuroblasts to Prevent Elav-Induced Premature Differentiation  Sen-Lin Lai, Michael R. Miller,
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages (March 2015)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Justin Crest, Kirsten Concha-Moore, William Sullivan  Current Biology 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Polarity Determinants Tea1p, Tea4p, and Pom1p Inhibit Division-Septum Assembly at Cell Ends in Fission Yeast  Yinyi Huang, Ting Gang Chew, Wanzhong Ge,
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
A Role for Retrotransposon LINE-1 in Fetal Oocyte Attrition in Mice
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Florence Couteau, Monique Zetka  Developmental Cell 
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Anne Royou, Mary E. Gagou, Roger Karess, William Sullivan  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Anna Marie Sokac, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Telomere Protection without a Telomerase
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages (September 2016)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Proliferation of Double-Strand Break-Resistant Polyploid Cells Requires Drosophila FANCD2  Heidi S. Bretscher, Donald T. Fox  Developmental Cell  Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 444-457 (June 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Lack of p53-Dependent Apoptosis in Papillar Precursors (A and B) Third instar larval wing imaginal discs. (A) Nuclei in undamaged disc. (B) Pycnotic nuclei (arrows) in irradiated disc, 6 hr post IR. (C and D) Second instar rectum (during papillar precursor endocycling). (C) Nuclei in unirradiated rectum. (D) No pycnotic nuclei in rectum, 6 hr post IR. (E) Percentage of pycnotic nuclei from (A)–(D) (wing data, blue; rectum data, red). Numbers indicate mean percent pycnotic nuclei/animal (n = minimum 10 animals per condition, multiple replicates). ∗p < 0.001, two-tailed t test. Error bars denote SD. (F) UAS-p53 expression in rectum (using byn-Gal4) does not induce pycnotic nuclei. (G) UAS-hid, UAS-rpr co-expression in rectum (see Experimental Procedures) does induce pycnotic nuclei. DAPI = DNA in all images. Scale bars, 10 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Acentric Chromosomes Accumulate and Segregate during WT Papillar Development (A–D) (A) Example of a papillar cell with acentric chromosome (arrow, inset 2× magnified). DAPI = DNA. (B) Example of a diploid imaginal disc cell with normal karyotype. DAPI = DNA. (C) Number of aberrations per cell for cells examined in (A) and (B). (D) Distribution of acentric/fused chromosomes for cells examined in (A) and (B). Data from n = 96 octoploid (8N) and n = 93 diploid (2N) cells from eight replicates. The increased incidence of aberrant karyotypes in 8N versus 2N is significant when accounting for increased chromosomes in 8N cells (chi-square, p < 0.05). (E and F) Time lapses of papillar mitosis. CenpC-Tomato = kinetochores (KTs, purple), histone H2AV = DNA (green, nuclear), and Moesin-GFP = cell membranes (Memb, green). Time is in minutes relative to anaphase onset. (E) Example of normal mitotic segregation. (F) Example of acentric chromatids that segregate into daughter nuclei. White arrows and 2× magnified, contrast-enhanced insets highlight segregating acentric DNA. (G) Diagram of fate of acentric and fused papillar chromosomes. Green, DNA; purple, centromeres. (H) Frequency of mitotic errors in 8N papillar and 2N imaginal disc tissue. Data from n = 92 (papillar) and n = 89 (imaginal disc) movies (numerous replicates). Scale bars, 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Papillar Development Is Refractory to Frequent Chromosome Structural Aberrations (A–D) (A) Example of chromosome structure in 8N mitotic papillar cell 5 days after IR induced during endocycles. Acentric fragments (yellow arrows, 2× magnified inset in A′) and chromosome fusions (white arrows) are indicated. (B) Diploid genital imaginal disc karyotype, from animal irradiated at the same time as cells in (A). (C) Number of aberrations per cell from irradiated octoploid WT (8N) papillar and diploid WT (2N) imaginal disc cells. (D) Distribution of acentric/fused chromosomes from same animals as in (C). Compare data in (C) and (D) with unirradiated data in Figures 2C and 2D. Data from n = 70 and n = 54 polyploid and diploid cells, respectively. The increased incidence of aberrant karyotypes in 8N versus 2N is significant when accounting for increased chromosomes in 8N cells (chi-square, p < 0.0001). (E) Time-lapse of papillar mitosis after IR induced during endocycles. CenpC-Tomato = kinetochores (KTs, purple), histone H2AV = DNA (green, nuclear), and Moesin-GFP = cell membranes (Memb, green). Time is in minutes relative to anaphase onset. Example of lagging acentric DNA (white arrow, 2× magnified and contrast-enhanced insets) that segregates into daughter nuclei. Yellow arrow at 17:00 highlights contractile ring. (F) Distribution of mitotic defects in 8N papillar cells after IR, scored from time-lapse data. Note that the percentage of cells with acentric DNA is likely an underestimate, due to the co-existence of centromere-containing DNA that overlaps acentric DNA in some cases. (G) Average time from anaphase onset to cytokinesis furrow initiation. IR divisions were binned into those with/without detectable errors. Asterisk indicates significant change from No IR or IR with normal mitosis (two-tailed t test, p < 0.001). Error bars denote SD. Data in (E)–(G) from n = 113 IR divisions, from numerous replicates. (H) WT adult rectum. DNA, purple; papillae, pseudo-colored green. (I) WT adult rectum in animals irradiated during endocycles. (J) Adult papillar cell number in WT, from control and IR (induced during endocycles). n = 13–23 animals counted per condition from multiple replicates. Yellow bars denote the mean. DAPI = DNA in all images. White scale bars, 5 μm; yellow scale bars, 50 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 FANCD2 Promotes Papillar Cell Viability and Prevents Micronucleus Formation after IR (A) Representative image of papillar chromosomes in fancd2 RNAi#1 animal. Arrows indicate acentric chromosomes. DAPI = DNA. (B) Frequency of acentric and fused chromosomes in WT versus fancd2 RNAi#1 papillar cells ± IR. Asterisk denotes significant change between WT and fancd2. (C–E) Adult fancd2RNAi#1 rectum (C), adult fancd2RNAi#1 rectum from animal irradiated during papillar endocycles (D), and adult fancd2RNAi#2 rectum from animal irradiated during papillar endocycles (E). Papillae false-colored in green, DNA in purple. For comparable controls see Figures 3H and 3I. (F) Adult papillar cell number in fancd2 ± IR. n = 8–30 animals per condition. Yellow bars denote the mean. Asterisk denotes significant change between No IR versus +IR compared with WT (see Experimental Procedures). (G) Time-lapse of fancd2RNAi#1 papillar cell after IR. CenpC-Tomato = kinetochores (KTs, purple), histone H2AV = DNA (green, nuclear), and Moesin-GFP = cell membranes (Memb, green). Time is in minutes relative to anaphase onset. White arrows indicate unaligned DNA that form micronuclei, and yellow arrows indicate cytokinetic furrow. (H) Frequency unaligned DNA and micronuclei ± IR in WT versus fancd2RNAi#1. Data from n = 84–113 divisions per condition, from multiple replicates. Asterisk indicates significant change from No IR (chi-square, p < 0.00001) (see Experimental Procedures). (I) Unaligned PH3+ chromosomes (green labeling/arrows, DNA in purple) in fancd2RNAi#1 after IR. (J) Persistent PH3+ micronuclei (green labeling/arrows, DNA in purple) in fancd2RNAi#1 after IR. (K) Frequency PH3+ micronuclei ± IR in WT versus fancd2RNAi#1. Data from n = 18–27 animals per condition from multiple replicates. Yellow bars denote the mean. Asterisk indicates significant change from No IR (two-tailed t test, p < 0.01). (L) Diagram of acentric chromosome fate in fancd2 after IR. Green, DNA; purple, centromeres. Instead of segregating completely into daughter nuclei as in Figure 3E, acentric DNA accumulates in micronuclei (indicated by small green circles without centromeres). DAPI = DNA in all images. White scale bars, 50 μm; yellow scale bars, 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 FANCD2 Promotes Papillar Cell Viability and Prevents Micronucleus Formation Specifically in Response to Acentric Chromosomes (A) Top: diagram of I-Cre system. One acrocentric X chromatid (green) shown before/after I-Cre-induced DSB severs the connection with the centromere (purple). Bottom: example of uncut and cut X chromosomes in papillar cells from I-Cre-expressing flies. (B) Frequency of mitotic papillar cells after I-Cre (expressed during endocycles) with at least one aberrant X chromosome at metaphase (Meta, from chromosome preparation data) or with lagging DNA at anaphase (Ana, from live imaging data). Data from n = 58–82 cells per condition, from multiple replicates. (C) Representative time-lapse papillar DNA segregation following I-Cre (expressed during endocycles). CenpC-Tomato = kinetochores (KTs, purple), histone H2AV = DNA (green). Time in minutes relative to anaphase onset. Arrow indicates lagging DNA, which segregates. (D) WT adult rectum after I-Cre (expressed during endocycles). Papillae, false-colored green; DNA, purple. (E) fancd2RNAi#1 adult rectum after I-Cre (expressed during endocycles). Papillae, false-colored green; DNA, purple. (F) Average adult papillar cell number per animal for WT and fancd2RNAi#1 ± I-Cre. Data from n = 8–23 animals per condition, multiple replicates. Asterisk indicates significant change between ± I-Cre compared with WT (see Experimental Procedures). Yellow bars denote the mean. (G) Unaligned PH3+ chromosomes (green labeling/white arrow, DNA in purple) in fancd2RNAi#1 after I-Cre. (H) Persistent PH3+ micronuclei (green labeling/white arrows, DNA in purple) in fancd2RNAi#1 after I-Cre. (I) Number of PH3+ micronuclei ± I-Cre in WT versus fancd2RNAi#1 and fancd2RNAi#2. Yellow bars denote the mean. Data from n = 17–23 animals per condition, multiple replicates. Asterisk indicates significant difference from WT (two-tailed t test, p < 0.005). (J–M) Survival of adults of WT (blue) and fancd2 RNAi#1 (red) animals over time for the indicated I-Cre and diet conditions. Error bars denote SE. Each genotype/condition represents three replicates with ten animals per replicate. DAPI = DNA in all images. White scale bars, 50 μm; yellow scale bars, 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Depletion of fancd2 in the Absence of Endocycle S Phases Does Not Alter the Acentric DNA Phenotype (A) Experimental procedure. I-Cre was induced during second larval instar papillar endocycles. Following endocycles (third larval instar), fancd2 RNAi was induced. On pupal day 2 (D2), the first papillar mitosis was examined. (B) EdU labeling (green, DNA in purple), showing S phase in the second instar larval rectum (area to right of white line). (C) EdU/DNA labeling as in (B), now showing that endocycles are complete in the rectum by third instar stage (note that endocycles continue in the ileum, left of the white line). (D) Time-lapse of I-Cre/fancd2 RNAi#1 animal cultured under conditions shown in (A). Example of unaligned acentric DNA fragment (white arrows) that ends up in a micronucleus following cytokinesis (yellow arrow). Purple, kinetochores (KTs, CenpC-Tomato); green, DNA (DNA, histone-GFP) and cell membranes (Memb, Moesin-GFP). Time in minutes relative to anaphase onset. (E) Graph of incidence of unaligned metaphase acentric DNA and micronuclei after anaphase in WT or fancd2 RNAi#1 following I-Cre expression, as in (A). Data from n = 30–32 cells per condition. Asterisk indicates significant change (chi-square, p < 0.001). White scale bar, 25 μm; yellow scale bar, 5 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 FANCI and Blm Also Facilitate Papillar DSB Survival (A) Average adult papillar cell number per animal for WT and indicated FANCD2 network mutants ± IR. Data from n = 7–25 animals per condition, multiple replicates. Asterisk indicates significant change ± IR compared with WT (see Experimental Procedures). Yellow bars denote the mean. (B) Average adult papillar cell number per animal for WT and indicated mutants ± I-Cre. Data from n = 9–11 animals per condition, multiple replicates. Asterisk indicates significant change ± I-Cre compared with WT (see Experimental Procedures). Yellow bars denote the mean. (C–F) fanci RNAi#1 adult rectum after IR (C), fancm adult rectum after I-Cre (D), fanci RNAi#1 adult rectum after I-Cre (E), and blm RNAi#1 adult rectum after I-Cre (F). Papillae, false-colored green; DNA, purple. (G) Number of PH3+ micronuclei ± I-Cre in WT versus fanciRNAi#1 and fanciRNAi#2. Yellow bars denote the mean. Data from n = 9–27 animals per condition, multiple replicates. (H and I) Survival of fanci RNAi#1 adults without (blue) or with (red) I-Cre expression, plotted over time for the indicated diet conditions. Error bars denote SE. Each genotype/condition represents three replicates with ten animals per replicate. DAPI = DNA in all images. White scale bars, 50 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Canonical DNA-Damage Regulators Are Not Required for Papillar Cell Survival in Response to Acentric Chromosomes (A and B) Average adult papillar cell number per animal for WT and indicated mutants ± IR (A) or I-Cre (B). Data from n = 7–17 animals per condition, multiple replicates. Asterisk indicates significant change ± IR or I-Cre compared with WT (see Experimental Procedures). Yellow bars denote the mean. (C–F) grp, lok adult rectum after IR (C), p53 adult rectum after IR (D), tefuRNAi#1 adult rectum after I-Cre (E), and mei-41 adult rectum after I-Cre (F). DNA (labeled with DAPI), purple; papillae, pseudo-colored in green. Scale bars, 50 μm. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 444-457DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.004) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions