AT ASSESSMENT 7 elements to include Teresa Pinder MLS/AT, OTL/R, ATP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Team Approach to AT/TSE Assessment
Advertisements

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS. Coming Attractions Assistive Technology Defined Assistive Technology and the IEP Assistive Technology Devices Defined.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Purpose of Instruction
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Amy A. Peterman ADMS 625 Summer days notice to parents prior to meeting School and parents must agree on time and place of meeting. School can.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Joan Breslin Larson Follow up webinar post Feb for AT Conference for AT Teams Hosted by Oklahoma.
Implementing Assistive Technology in School and Beyond 1.
Assistive Technology and the IEP Process Jim Stachowiak, ATP Iowa Center for Assistive Technology Education and Research.
Surrogate Parent Training
1 Assistive Technology? What Does It Have to Do with Me? Joy Zabala,, M.Ed., ATP Assistive Technology and Leadership Lake Jackson, Texas
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
ASNAT & Math Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative This PowerPoint was made possible by funding from IDEA grant number
Assistive Technology Getting There Another Way. “The Power of A.T. to improve and enhance the lives of individuals with disabilities is virtually.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
THE PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Chapter 2.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Assessment Callie Cothern and Heather Vaughn. A Change in the view of assistive technology assessment: From a one shot, separate event to an ongoing,
Assistive Technology Tools That Benefit ALL Learners By Lourdes Day, FDLRS Technology Specialist Local Assistive Technology Team (LAT)
Technology for Learning Elizabeth Pearce Lewis University.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Lorinda Tait Parents What you need to know about assistive technology.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
AT and Transition Aligning Accommodations Powerpoint.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Ms. Boldt.
SPED 473 Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Assistive Technology.
Assistive Technology Factors in Assessment Equal Access The primary purpose of AT is enhancing of capabilities and lowering barriers to achievement. AT.
Cc Developed through a partnership of the Maryland State Department of Education Division of Special Education and Early Intervention Services and the.
Assistive Technology Tools That Benefit ALL Learners By Lourdes Day, FDLRS Technology Specialist and Local Assistive Technology Team (LAT) Florida Diagnostic.
Joy Zabala, AT & LEADERSHIP Joy Smiley Zabala, Ed.D, ATP SETTing the Stage for Technology-Supported Achievement.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
From SETT to TEST: Evaluating Assistive Technology Presenter: Nadiya Destiny
Technology for Learning Rob Culp Lewis University.
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
+ ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY (AT) ROUND ROBIN PART 2: AT ASSESSMENT Presented by Oklahoma ABLE Tech.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCESS. STEP 1- THE CHILD IS DETERMINED AS POSSIBLY NEEDING SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICES There are two primary ways in which.
1. What is ESY? Extended School Year is the provision of an individualized instructional program beyond the normal school year to minimize the loss of.
Slide 1 Assistive Technology Guidelines for Kentucky Schools AT Training Team.
Assistive Technology Assessment Process Bonnie Young Wendy Homlish AT Consultants Carbon Lehigh Intermediate Unit 21.
Utah Assistive Technology Teams
Menlo Park City School District Special Education Self-Review (SESR)
Navigating the Education System as a Preemie Advocate
The Value of Person-Centered Planning
Exceptionalities Guideline
The Special Education Process
ARC Chairperson Training
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Developmental Reading Assessment
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
SETT FRAMEWORK Collaborative Decision Making Process
ARC Chairperson Training
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
1:1 Aides 1/29/2016.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
From the beginning: CAP Project Received full commissioning in 2007 to provide two levels of service. NHS England commissioned 13 AAC Hub Services in 2014.
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Assistive Technology Implementation
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Writing Assistive Technology (AT) in the IEP: A brief guide
Presentation transcript:

AT ASSESSMENT 7 elements to include Teresa Pinder MLS/AT, OTL/R, ATP R-LATS-Levy

Insuring a TEAM Approach The members of the customary IEP (individual education plan) team –student, parent, teachers, therapists, ect… Those with direct interaction / involvement, who have unique information to contribute to the problem solving process. Together engage in a problem solving process to address the identified need(s) of the student within their LRE (least restrictive environment) 2nd bullet-In the case of a student with a 504 plan 3rd bullet-the need is identified by the goals and objectives of the IEP, through the RtI process, or by documentation/data

Focus on the STUDENT Team decisions are based on student need and are not restricted / limited to the currently available resources and tools. It is in the best interest of the student to explore the tools that are familiar / available to the school / classroom. The student has the final say in the tool(s) he/she will use to meet their need(s). #2- in the interest of time and learning curve of the student and the teacher, looking at the currently known and available tools is the quickest option. #3- if the student is unable to be an active participate in the decision making process then the data recorded during the use of the tool should drive the team decision.

What needs to be ACCOMPLISHED? What is it the student is have difficulty with getting done, that his same age peers are doing / learning to do. The goals and objectives on the IEP should identify the task(s) the student needs to accomplish in the classroom. A task analysis may need to be considered to ensure all steps of the classroom activity are addressed.

Relevant Environmental Needs Where and when are the tools needed by the student? In what place does the identified task need to be accomplished? All the customary environments of the student need to be identified.

Trials and Data Data on ease of use, productivity , student success should be kept on each tool, used over time, within the customary environment. A continuum of tools/ options– low technology, mid-technology, high technology– need to be considered. Level of tech. is based on the user- the learning required for proficiency / independent in using the tool/ system to achieve success. LOW Tech.- no power source, most are easy to understand learn, and quickly available MID Tech.- has a power source, can be taught / learned by reading directions, demonstration and practice & has a single use. HIGH Tech.- has a power source, takes an expert to teach over time, takes time, energy and effort from the student to learn. The decision on who keeps what data/ keep track on, is a team decision. Show examples for writing, reading and math. Research suggests learning High tech. is like learning to speak, read, write a 2nd language. High tech is difficult for the student and the family to learn, these students are the most involved/ needy.

Ongoing Support and Monitoring What supports and services will be needed during the data gathering process? An Assistive Technology Implementation Plan is written to identify: what data is to be taken, who takes it, when the length of the trial(s) period who oversees / is responsible for / address possible issues / problems

Ongoing Support and Monitoring Following trial period the data is evaluated Team members make recommendations Student should have the final decision Training for the student and all others to be identified and addressed.

Ongoing process IEP teams are required to “consider” AT any time goals and objectives are written, revisited or reviewed. to meet the identified need(s) of the student CONDSIDER = the discussion during the IEP team meeting using known information and results to inform a decision regarding assistive technology already being used, trying different assistive technology or discontinuing assistive technology currently in place

Ongoing process Tool/device acquisition for trial(s) Regional labs State Loan Library Training- who provides to student, teacher, family LATS R-LATS FDLRS Seminars/conferences

Assessment process Recognize this is a process: as the student’s needs change the environment changes the student encounters a new or different task the team is required to address the need for AT again. AT implementation plan

IDEA: Supports and Services “any service that directly assists a child with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device” (IDEA 2004) Training- student, teacher, family Includes customizing, repairing, replacing the device / tool which is identified as being needed by the student for FAPE.

IDEA: Supports and Services Assessment beyond customary IEP team Trial(s) data does not reflect meeting the student need(s) There is conflict within the team Student request An outside agency has requested / requirement (third party payer) Must occur within the student’s customary environment—not a private evaluation When a parental permission is requested, the 60 day time line takes effect.

SETT Framework (Zabala) SETT Framework for assessment: decision making and implementing the AT plan. S: for the Student E: for the Environment T: for the Tasks T: for the Tools needed for the student to address the task(s) A framework for teams– questions to answer Documents and more information at the website http://www.joyzabala.com/Documents.html

S: STUDENT Who is the student? What are the student’s special needs? current abilities? What does the student need to do? (main areas of concern) Identify about the student: what we know and what we need to know!

E: ENVIORNMENT What are the instructional and physical arrangements in the environment(s)? Are there special concerns? What materials and equipment are currently available in the environment(s)? What supports are available to the student and the people working with the student on a daily basis? How are attitudes/expectations of others in the environment affecting student performance?

T: TASK What activities/tasks occur in the student’s natural/customary environment(s) which enable progress of the IEP goals? What is everyone else in the environment doing? (peers, siblings, others?) What are the critical elements of the activities/tasks and what makes these difficult for the student?

T: TOOLS Is the solution of AT tool(s) and strategies required for the student with these needs and abilities to do these tasks in these environments? What low tech, mid. tech, and high tech solutions/options should be considered? Based on IEP/ needs and the learning curve for the student.

T: TOOLS How might the student’s needs be accommodated without changing the important elements of the tasks/activities? What strategies might be used to incorporate AT solution(s) into the task/situation/activities ?

AT ASSESSMENT 7 elements to include QUESTIONS – Contact the office of Exceptional Student Education and Student Services