Chiral Cilia Orientation in the Left-Right Organizer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2009;9(6):10. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Cortical Microtubule Contacts Position the Spindle in C
The Y Cell Visual Pathway Implements a Demodulating Nonlinearity
Guangying K. Wu, Pingyang Li, Huizhong W. Tao, Li I. Zhang  Neuron 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages e5 (May 2018)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Vibrissal Kinematics in 3D: Tight Coupling of Azimuth, Elevation, and Torsion across Different Whisking Modes  Per Magne Knutsen, Armin Biess, Ehud Ahissar 
Sing-Hang Cheung, Fang Fang, Sheng He, Gordon E. Legge  Current Biology 
IFT88 Plays a Cilia- and PCP-Independent Role in Controlling Oriented Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Embryonic Development  Antonia Borovina, Brian.
Andres Laan, Tamar Gutnick, Michael J. Kuba, Gilles Laurent 
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Jan Schlueter, Takashi Mikawa  Cell Reports 
Marc Jendrny, Thijs J. Aartsma, Jürgen Köhler  Biophysical Journal 
Anne L. Sapiro, Patricia Deng, Rui Zhang, Jin Billy Li  Cell Reports 
Alessandro De Simone, François Nédélec, Pierre Gönczy  Cell Reports 
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
A Switching Observer for Human Perceptual Estimation
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Nachiket Shembekar, Hongxing Hu, David Eustace, Christoph A. Merten 
POP-1 and Anterior–Posterior Fate Decisions in C. elegans Embryos
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Fabian N. Svara, Jörgen Kornfeld, Winfried Denk, Johann H. Bollmann 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 16, Pages e4 (August 2018)
A Switching Observer for Human Perceptual Estimation
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e2 (November 2018)
Interplay between Ciliary Ultrastructure and IFT-Train Dynamics Revealed by Single- Molecule Super-resolution Imaging  Felix Oswald, Bram Prevo, Seyda.
D.R. Rich, A.L. Clark  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages (November 2010)
Embryonic Axes: The Long and Short of It in the Mouse
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Asif A. Ghazanfar, Daniel Y. Takahashi, Neil Mathur, W. Tecumseh Fitch 
Michal Rivlin-Etzion, Wei Wei, Marla B. Feller  Neuron 
Chiral Forces Organize Left-Right Patterning in C
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Giulia Varsano, Yuedi Wang, Min Wu  Cell Reports 
Felix Ruhnow, David Zwicker, Stefan Diez  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Producing Cells Retain and Recycle Wingless in Drosophila Embryos
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 17, Pages (September 2013)
Under-Recruitment and Nonselective Recruitment
Apical Complex Genes Control Mitotic Spindle Geometry and Relative Size of Daughter Cells in Drosophila Neuroblast and pI Asymmetric Divisions  Yu Cai,
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Clark Fisher, Winrich A. Freiwald  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Chiral Cilia Orientation in the Left-Right Organizer Rita R. Ferreira, Guillaume Pakula, Lhéanna Klaeyle, Hajime Fukui, Andrej Vilfan, Willy Supatto, Julien Vermot  Cell Reports  Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages 2008-2016.e4 (November 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 25, 2008-2016.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Zebrafish Left-Right Organizer Is Asymmetric (A) The zebrafish embryo (left) highlighting the KV (gray box). The zoom-up box (right) shows the transverse section of the KV, depicting the cilia (green) and the directional flow (black arrows). The embryonic body plan axes are marked as AP (anterior-posterior) and LR (left-right). The body plan reference frame is defined by basis vectors eD (dorsal), eL (left), and eA (anterior). (B) Cilia orientations are represented by two angles: θ (tilt angle from the surface normal en) and φ (angle between the surface projection of the ciliary vector and the meridional direction em). Cell surface is represented in gray, em in blue, ef in red, and the normal en in green. (C and D) Distributions of φ at 9–14SS obtained from 14 wild-type vesicles with 730 cilia. (C) Average φ values displayed in a 2D flat map showing that ϕ is higher on the left (0° ≤ α ≤ 180°, red) than on the right (−180° ≤ α ≤ 0°, blue). (α,β) are spherical coordinates on the KV surface with (0,0) at the anterior pole (Ferreira et al., 2017). (D) φ angle distribution of left- and right-sided motile cilia (black tick, population mean; gray stripe, 95% confidence interval [CI]): 0° indicates the meridional (em) and 90° the flow direction (ef). Nc, number of cilia. (E) Orientation of the 3D resultant vector on the left and right sides of the KV. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2018 25, 2008-2016.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Asymmetric Cilia Orientation Arises over Time (A) φ angle distributions of the left-sided (left) and right-sided (right) cilia for WT 3SS (upper) and WT 8SS (lower). (B) φavg on the left and right sides at 3SS and 8SS. (C) Mean orientation φavg of motile cilia in the left (red) and right (blue) half of the KV as a function of time (error bars, 95% CI). See also Figures S1, S2, and S3. Cell Reports 2018 25, 2008-2016.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 DNAAF1 and PCP Are Important for Asymmetric Cilia Orientation (A) Mean orientations (φavg) for each condition. Each dot represents the mean for one KV, the cross indicates the average for all KVs, and the line indicates the SD. The mean values of φavg are always positive, except for dnaaf1−/−, revealing that its orientation is reversed with respect to the meridional direction. WT3SS, WT6SS, dnaaf1−/−3SS, and trilobite−/−8SS have values close to zero, implying a symmetric KV. (B) φ angle distribution of cilia in both KV hemispheres (left and right cilia), for dnaaf1−/−3SS (upper) and dnaaf1−/−8SS (lower). dnaaf1−/−3SS and dnaaf1−/−8SS cilia are inclined in the direction opposite to the flow (ef). (C) φavg on the left and right sides of the KV for dnaaf1−/−3SS and dnaaf1−/−8SS. (D) Mean values of φavg on the left (red) and right (blue) sides of the KV for WT3SS, WT9-14SS, and trilobite−/−8SS. (E) φ angle distribution of cilia in both KV hemispheres (left and right cilia) and φavg (left/right) for trilobite−/−8SS. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Video S1. Cell Reports 2018 25, 2008-2016.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Basal Body Position in KV Cells, and Schematic Summary of the Contributions of Different Pathways and Potential Origins of Chirality Leading to Asymmetric Cilia Orientation in the KV (A–D) Basal body position analysis. The positions of basal bodies relative to the AP or LR extension of each cell were extracted from WT (A) or dnaaf1−/− embryos (B) using an orthogonal projection of the fluorescence intensity on the plane tangential to the KV surface after ZO1 and gamma tubulin staining of KV cells. The distributions of AP displacements (0 = anterior, 1 = posterior) in (C) and LR displacements (0 = right, 1 = left) in (D) are centered in the middle of the cell (displacement at 0.5) for all of the cases, except for a posterior displacement of basal bodies in WT. (E) Left, dorsal view of a mirror-symmetric KV showing a representative cilium on each side. Right, average φ orientation over time in WT, dnaaf1−/−, and trilobite−/− KV for cilia in the right (upper row) and left (lower row) KV hemispheres. KV is mirror symmetric at 3SS in both WT and dnaaf1−/− embryos, evolving to an asymmetric orientation at 8SS. In contrast, trilobite−/−8SS KVs do not show any asymmetry. (F and G) Two hypotheses for the observed chirality (dorsal-posterior views of the KV in F and G, inside views of both sides in F’ and G’): (F) cilia orientation can be asymmetric between left and right due to chiral orientation of the basal bodies; (G) alternatively, the basal bodies can be arranged symmetrically, but the chiral structure of each cilium leads to an overall asymmetric distribution of cilia orientations. Black arrows in (E), (F), and (G) indicate the flow direction. See also Figures S3 and S4 and Video S1. Cell Reports 2018 25, 2008-2016.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions