Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating Presentation City of Oberlin Public Works Department July 5, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACEC Conference March 5, 2012 Trudy Elsner P.E., Metro Maintenance, Engineering Services Sheila Johnson P.E., Metro Maintenance, Traffic Services.
Advertisements

Micro PAVER Pavement Management System
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Road Maintenance & Planning AUDUBON PARK. ASPHALT FAILURE TYPES ALLIGATOR CRACKING – AS SEEN ON CARDINAL.
Rigid Pavement Concrete. Transverse Cracking Rigid Pavement Transverse Cracking Causes:  Slab longer than 15’ Slab Curl Curing.
City of Houston Street Surface Assessment Vehicle
Street Conditions Part 1 – State of the Streets Part 2 – Repairs and Maintenance Costs Part 3 – Options for Funding.
Pavement Management Engineer
City of Bloomfield Hills Asset Management Plan. Outline Overview plan Challenges and community input Recommendations for others.
1 Preserving Municipality Roadways Federal = 3% State = 20% Local = 77% 94% of paved roads have an Asphalt surface FHWA Source: Stephen R. Mueller,
The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners City of North Bend Pavement Management Plan & Street Utility Fee Analysis February 11, 2014.
Pavement/Infrastructure Management Program Review April 6, 2009 Remington & Vernick Engineers.
TOPIC OF THE DAY Flexible Pavement Distresses/Failure Of Structure.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Tranlation: EASL’s Average Daily Traffic Time or Traffic Pavement Condition Index Pavement Performance Pavement Condition High Performance Intersections.
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
The Dalles Pavement Preservation Program Presented by Bill Barrier Transportation Manager City of The Dalles Public Works Department.
County of Orange Pavement Management System and Sustainable Treatment Program Clark Shen, Manager OC Construction Materials Lab Krishna Nadaraja, Senior.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Preventive Maintenance
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PCC Overlays of HMA Pavements
Session 3-6 HMA Overlays.
Highway Maintenance & Rehabilitation
Bituminous Roads Deterioration
Pavement Distresses Flexible Pavement
GDOT Maintenance Overview Eric C. Pitts, P.E. State Maintenance Engineer June 28, 2013.
Pavement Failures, Construction And Maintenance
Performance & Distress of Flexible Pavement Serviceability/Performance Concept.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1:
Micro-surfacing SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SemMaterials
April 19, 2005 PPTG Meeting Education Efforts for the PPTG How to share our knowledge and experience with others.
SR 1 BLUFFTON Public Hearing September 25, INDOT Mission: INDOT will plan, build, maintain and operate a superior transportation system enhancing.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
Department of Transportation Report on Condition of County Maintained Road System Agenda Item 53 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting April 26, 2005.
ODOT. Taking Care of What We Have. Asset Management, Life Cycle Analysis : A Three-Pronged Approach September 9th, 2015 Andrew Williams, Ohio DOT.
S ALES T AX : P AVEMENT M ANAGEMENT P ROGRAM P RESENTATION TO THE A LACHUA C OUNTY B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS A ND T HE C ITIZENS OF A LACHUA C OUNTY.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
S ALES T AX : P AVEMENT M ANAGEMENT P ROGRAM P RESENTATION TO THE A LACHUA C OUNTY B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS A ND T HE C ITIZENS OF A LACHUA C OUNTY.
Jeopardy Roads, Routes, and HighwaysYou Call It! Cause and EffectMiscellanousPotpourri Distress ID 101 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
ORDINANCE # Authorizing $372,760 for traffic signal interconnect at 47 th Street and Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard Start of project End of project.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
Pavement Maintenance and Microsurfacing Board of Aldermen Discussion Session January 26, 2010.
Protecting Your Pavement Investment Jeff Stokes. 4 R’s for Paving Success 1 Risk Management Identifying and minimizing your risk factors 2 Right Repair.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
STRONG NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE Public Works Department January 30, 2007 Agenda item 8.01.
Public Works Infrastructure Update Public Works Department April 5, 2016.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
A Data-Driven Strategy to Improve the Quality
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
AN-Najah National University AN-Najah National University
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Infrastructure Investment Needs
Kent County Road Commission Partnering with 21 Townships serving over 235,000 residents and 1312 miles of Local Roads.
Street Improvement Plan
HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE Failures in flexible pavement.
VIGNESH POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Pavement condition index calculation
Pavement Preservation
PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area
2014 Streets Resurfacing.
Document Development for Metro Project: Performance-based Procurement Asphalt Overlay for Programmed Maintenance 17/01/2019.
LONDON GROVE TOWNSHIP PUBLIC WORKS 2019 PAVEMENT CONDITION REPORT &
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating Presentation City of Oberlin Public Works Department July 5, 2011

Causes of Pavement Deterioration Environmental : weathering and aging Structural: repeated traffic loading – Sub base, base, quality of materials/construction Both Concrete curb Surface or wear course Intermediate course Bituminous aggregate base Crushed stone base Compacted sub-grade Underdrain

Four Categories of Pavement Distress Surface Defects Surface deformation Cracks Patches and Potholes

Pavement Condition Over Time

Visual inspection system Rates pavement surface on a scale of 1-10 Published by The Transportation Information Center, University of Wisconsin. Based in part on a roadway management system originally developed by Phil Scherer, transportation Planner, Northwest Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission. Compared to a more complicated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) which measures and rates each type of defect. Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER)

Excellent/Very Good Surface Rating Visible Distress*General condition/treatment measures 10 Excellent None.New construction. 9 Excellent None.Recent overlay. Like new. 8 Very Good No longitudinal cracks except reflection of paving joints. Occasional transverse cracks, widely spaced (40 or greater). All cracks sealed or tight (open less than 14). Recent sealcoat or new cold mix. Little or no maintenance required. * Individual pavements will not have all of the types of distress listed for any particular rating. They may have only one or two types.

Surface Rating - 10 Eric Nord Way – Constructed 2010 New Construction – No maintenance required.

Surface Rating - 9 East College (Oberlin Rd to RT 511)Oberlin Rd (East College to Plum Creek Bridge) Recent Overlay. Like new. – No maintenance required. Other examples: S. Pleasant, King, Oak, Smith, Edison, Gladys Ct., Prospect, Colony, Woodhaven, Orchard.

Surface Rating - 8 Fairway Dr. Recent Overlay showing longitudinal or transverse cracks. All cracks are tight or sealed. Little or no maintenance required This pavement is rated an 8 with most longitudinal cracks being tight but is starting to slip to a Surface Rating of 7 as cracks begin to widen.

Good Surface RatingVisible Distress*General condition/treatment measures 7 Good Very slight or no raveling, surface shows some traffic wear. Longitudinal cracks (open 14) due to reflection or paving joints. Transverse cracks (open 14) spaced 10 or more apart, little or slight crack raveling. No patching or very few patches in excellent condition. First signs of aging. Maintain with routine crack filling. 6 Good Slight raveling (loss of fines) and traffic wear. Longitudinal cracks (open 14– 12), some spaced less than 10. First sign of block cracking. Sight to moderate flushing or polishing. Occasional patching in good condition. Shows signs of aging. Sound structural condition. * Individual pavements will not have all of the types of distress listed for any particular rating. They may have only one or two types.

Surface Rating - 7 Hill Creek Dr. First signs of aging. Maintain with routine crack filling. Longitudinal edge cracking. Without crack sealing can ravel, develop multiple cracks, and become wide enough to require patching.

Surface Rating - 6 E. College (Orchard to Oberlin Rd.) Shows signs of aging. Sound structural condition. Oberlin Rd (Lorain to College) Large cracks forming small pot holes requiring patching. Note multiple cracks forming along the curb.

Surface Rating - 6 Thomas Street Shows signs of aging. Sound structural condition. Beginning stages of block cracking caused by shrinking and hardening of the asphalt over time.

Fair Surface RatingVisible Distress*General condition/treatment measures 5 Fair Moderate to severe raveling (loss of fine and coarse aggregate). Longitudinal and transverse cracks (open 1 2) show first signs of slight raveling and secondary cracks. First signs of longitudinal cracks near pavement edge. Block cracking up to 50% of surface. Extensive to severe flushing or polishing. Some patching or edge wedging in good condition. Surface aging. Sound structural condition. Needs sealing or thin non- structural overlay (less than 2) 4 Fair Severe surface raveling. Multiple longitudinal and transverse cracking with slight raveling. Longitudinal cracking in wheel path. Block cracking (over 50% of surface). Patching in fair condition. Slight rutting or distortions (12 deep or less). Significant aging and first signs of need for strengthening. Would benefit from a structural overlay (2 or more). * Individual pavements will not have all of the types of distress listed for any particular rating. They may have only one or two types.

Surface Rating - 5 Robin Park Roads are still in good structural condition but clearly need sealcoating or overlay. Stern Cracking up to 50% of surface. Longitudinal cracking in the wheel path will move rating to a 4. Block cracking up to 50% of surface. Cracks open to ½.

Surface Rating - 4 Elm (Professor to Prospect) Roads show first signs of needing an overlay. Severe surface raveling which should no longer be sealed. Forest Extensive block cracking over 50% of surface. Patches in fair condition. Severe raveling and loss of surface material.

Surface Rating - 4 Groveland Roads show first signs of needing an overlay. Severe surface raveling which should no longer be sealed. S. Professor Significant patches in fair condition.Longitudinal cracking in the wheel path. Beginning signs of alligator cracking (a level 3 condition).

Poor-Failed Surface RatingVisible Distress*General condition/treatment measures 3 Poor Closely spaced longitudinal and transverse cracks often showing raveling and crack erosion. Severe block cracking. Some alligator cracking (less than 25% of surface). Patches in fair to poor condition. Moderate rutting or distortion (1 or 2 deep). Occasional potholes. Needs patching and repair prior to major overlay. Milling and removal of deterioration extends the life of overlay. 2 Very Poor Alligator cracking (over 25% of surface). Severe distortions (over 2 deep) Extensive patching in poor condition. Potholes. Severe deterioration. Needs reconstruction with extensive base repair. Pulverization of old pavement is effective. 1 Failed Severe distress with extensive loss of surface integrity. Failed. Needs total reconstruction. * Individual pavements will not have all of the types of distress listed for any particular rating. They may have only one or two types.

Surface Rating - 3 Woodland Will require select structural repair prior to milling and resurfacing. Union (Professor to Main) Extensive patching in poor condition. Open raveled alligator cracking. Small potholes.

Surface Rating - 3 Artino Will require select structural repair prior to milling and resurfacing. Elm (Prospect to cul-de-sac) Severe alligator cracking on the edges. Distortion with patches in poor condition. Severe alligator cracking with small potholes.

Surface Rating - 2 Woodland Severely deteriorated. Normally needs reconstruction. Severe alligator cracking over 75% of surface (criteria is 25%). Potholes, patches, and rutting. Sumner

Other considerations that factor into project prioritization. Underground utilities Curbs Under drainage system Select areas of failure Street type by function – Local, collector, arterial Street type by use – Residential, commercial, industrial Funding availability

5-Year Capital Plan STREETS Project Name/DescriptionFromToStatus North ProfessorLorainUnion$195,332 UnionMainProfessor$117,224 UnionProfessorWoodland$68,724 WoodlandLorainUnion$166,432 ArtinoLorainStern$287,707 SternArtinoTerminus$23,017 SumnerParkTerminus$114,035 Pavement MaintenanceSelect Locations$60, Subtotal:$1,032,471 ElmEast of Cul-de-SacProspect$72,009 ElmProspectCedar$222,062 ElmCedarProfessor$115,806 ForestProfessorCedar$92,437 ForestCedarProspect$70,900 West CollegeCollege Pl.Main$93,285 Pavement MaintenanceSelect Locations$90, Subtotal:$756,499 South ProfessorHamiltonLincoln$163,220 South ProfessorLincolnBike Path$122,786 South ProfessorBike PathSouth$72,229 South ProfessorSouthMorgan$124,910 South ProfessorMorganForest $92,372 South ProfessorForestVine $49,920 South ProfessorVineElm$99,215 South ProfessorElmCollege$94,361 Pavement MaintenanceSelect Locations$90, Subtotal:$909,013 GrovelandMainPleasant$93,052 GrovelandPleasantPark$91,694 GrovelandParkSpring$151,880 EdgemereProspectCul-de-Sac$70,198 North PleasantLorainCollege$128,691 Pavement MaintenanceSelect Locations $90, Subtotal: $625,515 SR58ODOT - 80%; Match - 20% $593,200 SR511ODOT - 80%; Match - 20% $2,489,400 Pavement Maintenance $90, Subtotal: $3,172,600 Cost includes construction and inspection (where applicable)

This PowerPoint presentation is posted on the Citys website at ProjectsandStudies.page