IPv6 Address Space Management A follow up to RIPE-261

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 30 June 2005.

Advertisements

LACNIC Policy Update Roque Gagliano LACNIC. Current Policies Proposals - LACNIC As a result of the Open Policy Forum at LACNIC XI four policy proposals.

Kuala Lumpur February 2004 APNIC 17 Kuala Lumpur February 2004 APNIC 17 IPv4 /8 Address Space Status.

Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 31 December 2004.

Internet Number Resource Status Report As of 31 March 2005.

December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report. December 2013 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 December.

March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report. March 2014 Internet Number Resource Report INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT As of 31 March 2014 Prepared.

1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.

1 Change in the Minimum Allocation Criteria Policy Proposal Proposed by Rajesh Chharia, President – ISPAI Presented by Kusumba S Vice President - ISPAI.

Current Policy Topics Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC RIPE Oct - 4 Nov 2011, Vienna.

1. 2 Information Document 22-E ITU-T Study Group 2 May 2003 Question:1/2 Source:TSB Title:IPv6 Address Management – Past, Present and Future (by Anne.

Global policy proposal for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries prop-069-v002.

IPv6 Address Space Management LIR Working Group RIPE-45 Barcelona, May 2003.

1 IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji Geoff Huston.

APNIC Policy Update 1 st TWNIC IP Open Policy Meeting 3 December, 2003 Taipei, Taiwan.

POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.

Address Policy SIG, APNIC Policy meeting, February 27th, 2003 (1) IPv6 Policy in action Feedback from other RIR communities David Kessens Chairperson RIPE.

1 APNIC allocation and policy update JPNIC OPM July 17, Tokyo, Japan Guangliang Pan.

Copyright © 2007 Japan Network Information Center Global Policy for the Allocation of the remaining IPv4 Address Space  Japan Network Information Center.

A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb

Prop-080: Removal of IPv4 Prefix Exchange Policy Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.

ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.

A proposal for an APNIC document editorial policy (prop-002-v001) Address Policy SIG APNIC 16, Seoul, Korea 21 August 2003.

Policy Implementation & Experience Report Leslie Nobile.

1 Application of the HD ratio to IPv4 [prop-020-v001] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.

A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.

Current Policy Topics Emilio Madaio RIPE NCC RIPE November 2010, Rome.

Draft Policy ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.

IPv4 IXP Address Policy APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Taipei, August 2001 Philip Smith.

1 IANA global IPv6 allocation policy [prop-005-v002] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.

Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries (Global Proposal) Draft Policy

1 IPv6 Allocation and Policy Update Global IPv6 Summit in China 2007 April 12, 2007 Guangliang Pan.

1 APNIC IPv6 Activities: Past, Present and Future Paul Wilson APNIC.

Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Proposal for IPv6 Policy for Essential Infrastructure in the AP region Izumi Okutani IP Address Section.

1 APNIC Open Address Policy Meeting Special Interest Group Session March 2nd, Korea, Seoul.

Draft Policy Better IPv6 Allocations for ISPs 1.History including origin & shepherds 2.Summary 3.Status at other RIRs 4.Staff/legal assessment 5.PPML.

8 th Address Policy SIG Report Takashi Arano Yong Wan Ju Kenny Huang Chair/co-Chairs of APNIC Address Policy SIG.

Regional Internet Registries An Overview

KRNIC Member Workshop November 2001 Seoul, Korea

Regional Internet Registries

A Coordinated Proposal Regional Internet Registries

IPv6 Documentation Address Policy

APNIC IPv6 pools and delegation practice

IPv6 Address Allocation APNIC

IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation

A Proposal for IPv4 Essential Infrastructure

Downstream Allocations by LIRs A Proposal

RIPE Policy Landscape Filiz Yilmaz ESNOG, February 2008.

Joint IPv6 Forum/IPv6 SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 26 February 2003

Introduction to IP Addressing & IPv6 Deployment Status

Requiring aggregation for IPv6 subsequent allocations

IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation

IPv6 Address Management Past, Present and Future

Policy SIG Wednesday 3 March 2010

A view from ARIN, LACNIC & RIPE Communities Laura Cobley

INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT Regional Internet Registries

Policy SIG Chair Report

Jane Zhang & Wendy Zhao Wei

Permitted Uses of space reserved under NRPM 4.10

IPv6 Allocation Service in JPNIC

Overview of policy proposals

INTERNET NUMBER RESOURCE STATUS REPORT

IPv6 distribution and policy update

IPv6 Allocation Status Report

Overview of policy proposals

IPv6 Address Space Management

Status Report on Policy Implementation at the APNIC Secretariat

Policy SIG Thursday 28 August Christchurch, New Zealand

Internet Number Resource Status Report Regional Internet Registries

Removing aggregation criteria for IPv6 initial allocations

Presentation transcript:

IPv6 Address Space Management A follow up to RIPE-261 APNIC16 - Address Policy SIG Seoul, Korea, 20 August 2003

Follow up to RIPE-261 (Jul 03) Document History RIPE-261 (Oct 02) ‘IPv6 Address Space Management’ http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-sparse.html Presented at RIR meetings Follow up to RIPE-261 (Jul 03) ‘Requesting larger IPv6 allocations from IANA and practicing ‘sparse allocations’ http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/archive/2003/07/msg00000.html

Background RIPE-261 – Current System IANA-RIR allocations /23 blocks RIR-LIR allocations Minimum allocation /32 Reservations up to /29 No contiguous allocation beyond /29 Sequential allocations by RIRs IPv4 based allocation system Observed long terms effects of fragmentation with IPv4 address space

IANA IPv6 Allocations to RIRs (1999-current) IPv6 Prefix Allocated To Date 2001:0000::/23 IANA Jul 99 2001:0200::/23 APNIC Jul 99 2001:0400::/23 ARIN Jul 99 2001:0600::/23 RIPE NCC Jul 99 2001:0800::/23 RIPE NCC May 02 2001:0A00::/23 RIPE NCC Nov 02 2001:0C00::/23 APNIC May 02 2001:0E00::/23 APNIC Jan 03 2001:1000::/23 (future) - 2001:1200::/23 LACNIC Nov 02 2001:1400::/23 RIPE NCC Feb 03 2001:1600::/23 RIPE NCC Jul 03 2001:1800::/23 ARIN Apr 03

RIPE-261 Proposal Objective Method Minimise long term fragmentation of IPv6 address space Method Practice ‘Sparse allocations’, otherwise known as ‘binary chop’ Management a single pool of addresses through ‘Common Allocation Pool’

“Sparse Allocation” system RIPE-261 Proposal “Sparse Allocation” system Maximise “distance” between allocations to distinct ISPs Maximise chance of aggregation of subsequent allocations For example… ISP A u ISP E y ISP C w ISP G ISP B v ISP F z ISP D x ISP H

Feedback RIPE-261 Favour Against General support for idea but no clear consensus on ‘Common Allocation Pool’ Support for IANA to allocate larger blocks /12, /8 suggested Against Using a common pool for allocations would no longer allow prefix filtering on RIR-IANA boundaries

RIPE-261 Follow Up Proposal IANA-RIR allocations IANA makes allocations to RIRs in /8 units Larger pool supports greater aggregation Preserves regional integrity ‘Sparse allocations’ May be practiced by RIRs within the allocated blocks (local policy) Reservation of uniform /29 is discontinued

22 Jul proposal sent to SIG mailing list Feedback so far… 22 Jul proposal sent to SIG mailing list Endorsement from RIPE Address Policy WG chair Several other comments strongly in favour Minor typo corrections One suggestion Sparse allocations MUST be used, rather than MAY be used

Develop IPv6 companion document Next Steps? Develop IPv6 companion document ‘IANA Policies for allocation of IPv4 blocks to RIRs’ Discuss in RIR communities Community feedback needed ASO endorsement Both IPv4 and IPv6 IANA-RIR policies document will be global policies

Questions? Feedback?