Suboptimization of developmental enhancers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Growth, Development and
Advertisements

Gene regulation /function card Anatomical network card Tassy et al., Figure S1: Navigation diagram of ANISEED Anatomical structure card Expression card.
Chapter 12- CNS and epidermis
Development What causes cell differentiation? Molecular Markers.
Chapter 12- CNS and epidermis Ectoderm-skin/nerves Endoderm- Gut and associated organs Mesoderm-Blood, heart, kidney, bones Recall lineages Now we focus.
BIO624: Developmental Genetics GASTRULATION PART I Suk-Won Jin, Ph.D.
Hox genes and pattern development of vertebrates Pattern formation: harmonious arrays of different elements, such as the array of fingers on the hand,
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings. BIOLOGY A GUIDE TO THE NATURAL WORLD FOURTH EDITION DAVID KROGH An Amazingly.
Development of Model Systems Xenopus laevis Part II
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Sequential Response to Multiple Developmental Network Circuits Encoded in an Intronic cis-Regulatory Module of Sea Urchin hox11/13b  Miao Cui, Erika Vielmas,
PART 2 Basic Embryology.
Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
PART 1 Basic Embryology.
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Christina D. Cota, Brad Davidson  Developmental Cell 
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
Ascidians and the Plasticity of the Chordate Developmental Program
Mosaic and regulative development: two faces of one coin
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (September 2015)
Strategy for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in ΔEx50 mice
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages (September 2000)
Hyunsook Lee, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
by Denes Hnisz, Abraham S. Weintraub, Daniel S
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Precision of Hunchback Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Molecular Targets of Vertebrate Segmentation
Neural and Head Induction by Insulin-like Growth Factor Signals
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
The Noncanonical Binding Site of the MED-1 GATA Factor Defines Differentially Regulated Target Genes in the C. elegans Mesendoderm  Gina Broitman-Maduro,
Systematic mapping of functional enhancer-promoter connections with CRISPR interference by Charles P. Fulco, Mathias Munschauer, Rockwell Anyoha, Glen.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Genetic perturbations using dad44C10 and dpp18E05 FlyLight lines.
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Mosaic and regulative development: two faces of one coin
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
Systematic mapping of functional enhancer–promoter connections with CRISPR interference by Charles P. Fulco, Mathias Munschauer, Rockwell Anyoha, Glen.
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages R381-R384 (May 2003)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Specification of Motor Neuron Identity by the MNR2 Homeodomain Protein
Congratulations! Now Get to Work
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Tagging of the endogenous Py03652 gene with the gfp gene in Plasmodium yoelii. Tagging of the endogenous Py03652 gene with the gfp gene in Plasmodium yoelii.
Single–base pair differences in a shared motif determine differential Rhodopsin expression by Jens Rister, Ansa Razzaq, Pamela Boodram, Nisha Desai, Cleopatra.
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Multiple sequence alignment of STAT6 and other STAT proteins produced by ClusterW and ESpript (espript.ibcp.fr/ESPript/ESPript/). Multiple sequence alignment.
Patterns of cell movement in paraxial mesoderm.
Regulation of FoxB expression.
Transcription factor network of human pancreas development.
Fig. 7. Representative images of control (Cas9+GFP) and Cas9+gRNA+GFP co-injected embryos on day 4 of culture, showing nuclear-imported GFP (green) and.
Fig. 8. The morphology of the ventral nerve cord in Ror-Myc overexpressing embryos is normal. The morphology of the ventral nerve cord in Ror-Myc overexpressing.
Conserved patterns of Shh expression from mammals to teleosts.
Fig. 2. Tbx1 lineage is largely complementary to the NSD
Fig. 1. Expression of a Ror-eGFP fusion protein under control of the endogenous Ror promoter in Drosophila embryos. Expression of a Ror-eGFP fusion protein.
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Linking Chordate Gene Networks to Cellular Behavior in Ascidians
Effects of a human FABP7 point mutation on FABP7 protein structure
Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen.
Opening Chromatin Molecular Cell
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Suboptimization of developmental enhancers by Emma K. Farley, Katrina M. Olson, Wei Zhang, Alexander J. Brandt, Daniel S. Rokhsar, and Michael S. Levine Science Volume 350(6258):325-328 October 16, 2015 Published by AAAS

Fig. 1 Otx-a enhancer is activated by FGF and maternal determinant GATA. (A) Expression of direct activators of Otx-a enhancer, FGF and GATA. (B) The sequence of the 69-bp Otx-a enhancer, showing the five core binding sites: three for GATA (GATA) and two for ETS (GGAA). Otx-a enhancer is activated by FGF and maternal determinant GATA. (A) Expression of direct activators of Otx-a enhancer, FGF and GATA. (B) The sequence of the 69-bp Otx-a enhancer, showing the five core binding sites: three for GATA (GATA) and two for ETS (GGAA). The core binding site is defined as the 4 bp recognized by all GATA and ETS transcription factors, and they are the major sites of protein-DNA interactions (32, 33). RS Otx-a enhancer variants retain all five core binding sites with the remaining sequence (49 bp) randomized. (C) Otx-a enhancer drives expression in the a6.5 (dark green) and b6.5 (light green) lineages, beginning at gastrulation. In the tailbud stage, a6.5 cells give rise to the anterior brain (br) and palps (pal), and b6.5 cells give rise to the dorsal nerve cord (nc), dorsal epidermis (epi), and two tail muscle cells (not shown). Emma K. Farley et al. Science 2015;350:325-328 Published by AAAS

Fig. 2 Suboptimal binding sites are sufficient for tissue-specific expression. Suboptimal binding sites are sufficient for tissue-specific expression. (A) Embryo electroporated with WT Otx-a enhancer; GFP can be seen in the anterior brain (br), palps (pal), dorsal nerve cord (nc), dorsal midline epidermis (epi), and two tail muscle cells (tm). (B) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a RS1, a synthetic enhancer variant identified in our screen that shows no GFP expression. (C) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a RS1opt, with all five core sites changed to have optimized flanking sequence; expression can be seen in endogenous location and in notochord, mesenchyme, endoderm, and posterior brain. (D) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a RS1 WT with all five core sites mutated to have WT flanking sequences; expression can be seen in endogenous Otx-a location only. (E) Sequence of WT, Otx-a RS1, Otx-a RS1 opt, and Otx-a RS1 WT enhancer variants. Gray boxes highlight bases conserved in WT Ciona intestinalis Otx-a sequence; pink boxes highlight bases that were changed to match identified “optimal” flanking motifs. All images were taken at the same exposure time, 500 ms. Emma K. Farley et al. Science 2015;350:325-328 Published by AAAS

Fig. 3 Suboptimization of spacing and flanking motifs is required for tissue specificity. Suboptimization of spacing and flanking motifs is required for tissue specificity. Spacing between adjacent binding sites is important for tissue specificity. (A) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a 46 (10-15-13 spacing); GFP expression can be seen in WT location. (B) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a 49 (13-15-13 spacing); addition of 3 bp between GATA1 and ETS1 leads to a significant increase in neural expression; and no ectopic expression is seen. (C) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a 46opt (10-15-13 spacing and all five core sites with optimized flanking); expression can be seen at higher levels in WT location and ectopic expression in notochord, mesenchyme, and posterior brain. (D) Embryo electroporated with Otx-a 49opt (13-15-13 spacing and all five core sites with optimized flanking); this enhancer shows strong expression in the endogenous neural location and ectopic expression in the notochord, posterior neural tube, and endoderm (see also fig. S12). All images were taken at the same exposure time, 250 ms. Emma K. Farley et al. Science 2015;350:325-328 Published by AAAS