Exploring The Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Transit Ridership

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pre-Wave Survey: Technology Adoption Future Research Experimental Design: Solomon 4 Group How can you access OneBusAway? Pre-Wave Survey: Using OBA Pre-Wave.
Advertisements

Political Support Needed to Improve Transportation 06 | 25 | 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SFMTA | Municipal Transportation Agency Image: Market and Geary.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
Role of Sharing in LEV Adoption Chris Cherry Assistant Professor-Civil and Env. Engineering University of Tennessee TRB Annual Meeting Joint Subcommittee.
CREATING THE CASE FOR MORE TRAVEL CHOICES John Bartels, City of Port Phillip and Ainsley Nigro, GHD Cost Benefit Analysis for Implementing Separated Bike.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
1 State of Good Repair Research Vincent Valdes Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation July 9, 2009.
National Transportation || || 1 Lei Zhang, Ph.D. Associate Professor Director,
HERSONISSOS MUNICIPALITY PROGRAMME RITMO (INTERREG III B. MEDOCC) Dr. John Frantzeskakis Transportation Engineer, Professor Emeritus National Technical.
1 POSSIBILITY OF MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN ASIAN COUNTRIES Authors: H. Tan VAN, Kasem CHOOCHARUKUL and Satoshi FUJII* Tokyo Institute of Technology - Department.
Lecture 1 Introduction- Manifestations of Transport and Tourism.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
Energy Use of Subway Networks in the Sustainability era 1 Sybil Derrible, Ph.D. Candidate, Department.
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Five Year ITS Strategic Plan (2010 – 2014). 2 U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Overall ITS Community.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Connected Vehicles Workforce FHWA Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
Relationship between Land Use and Transportation by Rae J. Furlonge.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Course Overview Unit 1: Introduction.
30-Year National Transportation Policy Framework to the Future September 12,
Simulating the PHEV Ownership Distribution and its Impacts on Power Grid  Xiaohui (Sean) Cui, PhD  Dean of International School of Software, Wuhan University,
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Public Transport Pricing Strategies using an Agent-based Simulation Platform (A Case study of Singapore and Lessons for Pakistan) Speaker : Dr. Muhammad.
Vehicle Automation at the ITF Recent Work and Future Activities Tom Voege, Transport Analyst International Transport Forum The 19 th Annual Meeting of.
Transport Access restriction schemes Technical workshop "Urban Mobility Package" Brussels, 13 th June 2013 Mark MAJOR DG MOVE Unit C1 : Clean Transport.
14/02/20081 Urban mobility Griet De Ceuster. 14/02/20082 CONTENTS Mobility concepts in a city: technologies in a mobility perspective Challenges for implementation.
SCATS Congestion Improvement Program. The Scope of the SCATS Congestion Improvement Program.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
1-1 Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage HRM.
Although the causes of peak car travel are still not entirely clear, this analysis shows that it is not a new phenomenon but rather a fundamental shift.
Zsuzsanna Csereklyei & David Stern
Office of Extraordinary Innovation
The Future of Transportation?
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Greater Toronto Transportation System
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment
Clifford Winston Brookings Institution
Automated Vehicles and Safety 2017 OR-PRIMA Conference September 28th, 2017 Gleneden Beach, OR Andrew Dick, CAEV Advisor
Transformational Technologies Update
Project Feasibility Analysis
– potential relevant financial allocations
Monitoring and Evaluation of Sustainable tourism
Trade in Road freight services in sadc: THE ROLE OF THE REGULATORS
Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Control
Internet Interconnection
( ) Effect of Regional Characteristics on Crash Injury Severity of Local Buses Using a Hierarchical Ordered Model General Information Session :
Hur klarar infrastrukturen?
2018 Autonomous Vehicle Summit
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
AMPO Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) Working Group
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS
EU Tyres labelling scheme
Road Infrastructure for Road Vehicles Automation
A Literature Review on Fully Autonomous Buses
Methodology and Results
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Lead Researcher: Constantine Samaras
SATC 2017 SOUTHERN AFRICAN SOLUTIONS TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT CHALLENGES
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
City Adaptation Strategy and UPD Policy Framework
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
Issues of Technology Needs Assessment for Climate Change
24th Annual TRICS® User Meeting Changes in Travel Behaviour Lynn Basford BasfordPowers London Transport Museum, Covent Garden Piazza Tuesday 25th June.
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
City Adaptation Strategy and UPD Policy Framework
Norwegian regulation on testing of self-driving vehicles on roads
Presentation transcript:

Exploring The Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Transit Ridership Please print the actual size 48 by 36 inches. Print actual size 48 by 36 inches Exploring The Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Transit Ridership Amin Mohamadi Hezaveh1, Candace Brakewood2, Christopher R. Cherry3 1: PhD Candidate, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; amohamad@vols.utk.edu 2: Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; cbrakewo@utk.edu 3: Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; cherry@utk.edu Traditional four-step model, adapted from Evans, Burke and Dodson 2007 INTRODUCTION MAIN TAKEAWAYS Overall effects of AVs on transit are unclear and require significantly more research. Role of AV-related policy and legislation on public transit ridership needs to be explored and may be shaped by policy initiatives emerging from legislative and administrative actions of various levels of government Several studies have shown the potential benefits of fully Autonomous Vehicles (AV) on mobility and safety; however, its effect on the overall transportation system is generally not well understood. The study proposes a framework based on the four-step travel demand model to explore the potential effects of AVs on ridership FACTORS INFLUENCING TRANSIT RIDERSHIP ASSUMPTIONS AVs are fully autonomous (L5) and connected AVs have large enough market penetration to have impacted the majority of travel decisions in an urban area. No significant changes in sociodemographic variables. No major changes in transportation infrastructure except those that are necessary for the performance of the connected autonomous vehicles. LIKELY SYSTEM IMPACTS Negative Impacts Extra comfort and privacy of personal AVs, compared to public transit, could increase the relative utility of AVs, which ultimately could lead to travelers shifting from transit toward AVs. Low costs of Shared AVs (SAV) and micro-transit AVs have the potential to adversely impact transit ridership by attracting travelers from traditional public transit services. AVs also remove mobility barriers for captive riders, which may cause migration of a portion of these travelers toward AVs or microtransit. AVs could also increase the capacity of existing roads and reduce delays at intersections, which could benefit public transit by cutting in-vehicle and out-of-vehicle travel time, which would positively impact ridership. Positive Impacts AVs could increase the capacity of existing roads, AVs could reducing delays at intersections, Improve adherence to schedules which could benefit public transit by cutting in-vehicle and out-of-vehicle travel time, which would positively impact ridership. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Daniel J. Fagnant for his contribution in the study design.