Sarah Rosatone, Lisa Jones PhD, Kimberly Mitchell PhD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Makes the Finger Point Internally? Predictors of Self-Blame/Guilt in Sexually Abused Boys and Girls ????? ???????? University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Advertisements

Optimism in Women Reporting Relationship Abuse Histories Sarah L. Hastings & Trisha Nash Department of Psychology, Radford University, Radford, Virginia.
By Sanjay Kumar, Ph.D National Programme Officer (M&E), UNFPA – India
Department of Human Development (0416), Department of Psychology (0436) & Center for Gerontology (0426), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
EVENT LEVEL: Sex obtained through aggression will frequently be unprotected GLOBAL LEVEL: Men who have perpetrated sexual aggression will be more likely.
CHILDHOOD MALTREATMENT AND ADOLESCENT ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR: Romantic Relationship Quality as Moderator Susaye S. Rattigan, M.A. & Manfred H.M. van Dulmen,
Maya West Mark Vosvick, Ph.D. Chwee-Lye Chng, Ph.D. Center for Psychosocial Health Research.
Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Depressive Symptoms: The Importance of Emotion Regulation and Close Friendships Introduction David E. Szwedo
Introduction Introduction Alcohol Abuse Characteristics Results and Conclusions Results and Conclusions Analyses comparing primary substance of abuse indicated.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Body Image Distress in Victims of Physical and Sexual Assault Terri L. Weaver 1, Ph.D., Michael G. Griffin 2, Ph.D. and.
Does Parenting Prevent Hopelessness in Low-Income Youth? Christy Thai, Meredith Henry, Sylvie Mrug Introduction Sample Measures Analysis Results Conclusions.
The Role of Close Family Relationships in Predicting Multisystemic Therapy Outcome: An Investigation of Sex Differences ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Multisystemic.
The Problem: Trauma Exposure  More than two thirds of Americans have experienced a significant traumatic event by age 16  More than one third have been.
Fighting Behavior among early adolescent African Americans: What are the personal and environmental factors? Vanya Jones, PhD, MPH APHA Session ,
Gender Specific Associations Between Parental Risk Factors and Trauma-Related Psychological Symptoms Among Adolescents Jamara A. Tuttle, MSW 1,2,Terry.
RAISING HIV-INFECTED AND AFFECTED YOUTH: THE IMPACT ON THE MENTAL HEALTH OF CAREGIVERS Stacey Alicea E. Karina Santamaria Elizabeth Brackis-Cott Curtis.
Bullies have feelings too: The role of empathy and self-esteem on bullying Jessica Peterson and Casey Dwyer Advisor: Ellen S. Cohn, Ph.D. Introduction.
A College Study of Grief, Depression, and Anxiety
Jacquelyn C. Campbell, PhD,. Jamila K. Stockman, PhD,. Phyllis W
Nation’s First Collaborative School of Public Health
Investigating the Associations Between Childhood Experience and
FLUORIDATED COMMUNITY WATER KNOWLEDGE AND OPINION AMONG PARENTS IN SOUTHWEST FLORIDA Courtney Uselton, DDS ; Maria E. Davila, DDS, MPH, DrPH; Scott L.
HIV-Related Stigma, Loneliness, and Sleep Quality
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN FIRST-TIME HOMELESS ADULTS*
Kimberly Jeffries Leonard, Ph.D.
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
The Association of Exposure to Adverse
SOL Downward Mobility and Psychological Well-Being
Emergency department pediatric psychiatric services
Rabia Khalaila, RN, MPH, PHD Director, Department of Nursing
Parental Alcoholism and Adolescent Depression?
Kreila Cote, Christie Miksys, Sapir Sasson, Jennifer Milliken, Julie L
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
Angelika H. Claussen, PhD,
Ana Progovac, PhD1,2,3 Benjamin Lê Cook, PhD MPH 1,2
How Does Culture Affect Latino College Students’ Mental Health?
Predictors of Parenting Self-Efficacy in Parents Attending College
Parental Affective Reactions to Prolonged Infant Crying: Does Risk Status or Parent Gender Matter? Kreila Cote, Christie Miksys, Sapir Sasson, Jennifer.
Assessing LEND Trainees' Knowledge of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
Predictors of Attitudes Towards Gay and Lesbian Couples
Parental Adverse Childhood Experiences:
Maternal Demographics
Conclusions & Implications Table 1: Characteristics of Sample (N=156)
Introduction Hypotheses Results Discussion Method
Table 1: NHBS HET3 Participant Characteristics
This research was supported by NIAAA K01AA
Believed discrimination occurred because of their:
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Self-discrepancies in the Social Role of Mother: Associations between Self-discrepancies and Negative Affect Nicole J. Holmberg, Laura D. Pittman, Emily.
Perceived versus Actual Knowledge of Autism Spectrum Disorder
ASSOCIATION OF CHILD ABUSE & MENTAL HEALTH SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS
The Influence of Protective Factors on Perceived Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences Laura Kenny, MPHc Thomas Jefferson University Background Results.
Past 30-Day Marijuana Use Categories
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
2University of Virginia
University of Virginia1 & James Madison University2
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Laura M. Sylke & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
Emily A. Davis & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
Lauren A. Barlotta & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Harmful Sexual Behaviour - 7 Minute Briefing
Prosocial Behaviors in Adolescence
Acting Out When You’re Down and Out:
General Social Competence (18)
Self-Reported Health Status and Health Behaviors of Pharmacy Students
Korey F. Beckwith & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Morgan M. Welch & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Arely M. Hurtado1,2, Phillip D. Akutsu2, & Deanna L. Stammer1
Presentation transcript:

Youth Disability Victimization: An Analysis of the Youth Bias Victimization Questionnaire (YBVQ) Sarah Rosatone, Lisa Jones PhD, Kimberly Mitchell PhD Crimes Against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire Methods Incident Characteristics Study Overview There are increasing concerns about how bias-based victimization may contribute to traumatic stress for vulnerable youth. This study uses data from a new instrument, the Youth Bias Victimization Questionnaire (YBVQ), which asks youth about experiences with a wide variety of bias-motivated victimizations. The current study focuses on comparisons of bias motivated victimization experiences among students with and without disabilities. Participants: Participants were 854 youth and young adults, ages 13-21, who completed surveys about personal bias-related victimization experiences. Participants were from Boston, Philadelphia, and areas of rural and suburban Tennessee: 63% were female, 29% were Black/African American,13% were Hispanic or Latino, and 27% reported having a physical or learning disability. Procedure: Participants were recruited from youth-serving agencies, housing authorities, festivals, and schools. The survey was administered using a computer assisted self-interview (CASI) with SNAP survey software on a tablet or through an online link to a web-based survey. On average, the survey took 15 minutes to complete and each participant received a $25 gift card. All procedures were approved by the UNH IRB. Measures: Newly developed measures assessed lifetime and past year exposure to bias-related victimization (i.e., because of race/ethnicity, religion, immigrant status, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity). To measure physical and learning disability status, youth were asked: “Do you have physical heath problems or disabilities that affect the kinds of activities that you can do?” and “Do you have any issues or disabilities that affect how you interact with people or learn, like ADHD, autism or a learning disorder?” A 9-item scale measured distress symptoms (e.g., feeling lonely in the last month; feeling sad in the last month); additional scales measured past year general victimization and social support.​   31 participants with disabilities reported details of their bias victimization experiences. 68% reported that the incident happened at school. 61% reported that the incident happened online. 71 % reported reported that the same person had victimized them more than once. 39% reported that the victimization went on for more than one year. The most common type of victimization experience for youth with disabilities is being called names, followed by having rumors spread about them. Research Question: To what degree do bias victimization experiences impact youth with disabilities? Objectives: Explore rates and characteristics of bias victimization experiences that youth with disabilities report. Compare differences in bias victimization rates for youth with different types of disability versus no reported disability.  Understand how youth with disabilities experience general victimization and social support differently. Explore whether experiencing disability victimization is uniquely related to increased distress symptomology. Results Discussion Table 1. Sample Demographics Youth with both a learning and physical disability experience significantly greater levels of bias victimization related to disability than youth with only a physical disability or only a learning disability. Youth with disabilities experience: Higher levels of general victimization Lower sense of social supports Higher distress symptoms Regression analyses indicate that bias victimization experiences uniquely contribute to distress symptoms for youth with disability, even controlling for other contributing factors. Non-heterosexual status and other victimization history also uniquely predict greater levels of distress for these youth. Figure 1. General Victimization Youth Characteristicsa No reported disabilities (n=624) % (n) Learning or physical disability (n=230) X2 Race/ethnicity Black/African American 30 (187) 24 (54) Latino/Hispanic 16 (96) 8 (17) White 42 (259) 54 (123) Other/mixed 12 (75) 15 (33) 16.742*** Sexual Orientation Heterosexual 73 (447) 59 (135) Gay/Lesbian/Homosexual 8 (50) 11 (25) Bisexual 11 (67) 17 (38) Other 13 (30) 14.744* Family Country of Origin Parents born in the U.S. 69 (419) 78 (171) Parents born outside the U.S. 31 (190) 22 (48) 6.774* **p< .01,*** p< .001 p=.000 Figure 2. Social Supports Limitations Introduction Our study sample focused on three different geographic areas so findings are not representative of all youth nationally. While the self-administered and anonymous survey was designed to promote candor in responses it is possible that not all participants answered the questions honestly. Our study measured disability through self-report. Not all participants may have reported a disability honestly or correctly. Bias victimization experiences are important to consider when evaluating the health of youth and young adults because of the potential for these experiences to have long-lasting impacts on mental and physical well-being. Bully victimization for students with disabilities is one and a half times greater than the national average for students without disabilities.1 Disability victimization can be influenced by other sociodemographic variations such as race and socio-economic status.2 Adolescents with intellectual disabilities who have experienced victimization exhibit social problems and social withdrawal, as well as emotional and relational problems.3 This study was supported by Grant No. 2015-R2-CX-K127 awarded by the National Institute of Justice (PI: Jones). Points of view or opinions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. aOther demographics (age, gender and religion) were not significant for differences between disability status. Table 2. Disability Victimization Figure 3. Distress Symptoms Disability-based Bias Victimization No reported disabilities (n=624) % (n) Physical disability (n=60) Learning disability (n=91) Learning and physical disability (n=46) X2 Last Year 4 (27) 12 (7) 14 (13) 37 (17) 71.451*** Ever 8 (47) 23 (14) 28 (25) 52 (24) 98.753*** *p< .05, **p< .01, ***p< .001 Future Directions Future studies should include a larger sample size, younger participants, and measures to determine differences among types of disability. Future studies should be done with multiple measures of respondent disability status. Table 3. Multiple Regression Analysis: Predictors of Emotional Distress for Youth with Disabilities (n=230) B SE B β t p Racea -.094 .140 -.047 -.671 .503 Sexual Orientationa .613 .133 .302 4.601 .000 Country of Origina -.081 .169 -.033 -.481 .631 Bias Victimizationb .350 .176 .138 1.992 .048 Other Victimization .128 .050 .178 2.588 .010 Social Support (Mean) -.074 .069 -.071 -1.075 .284 *p< .05, **p< .01, ***p< .001 References Blake, J. J., Lund, E. M., Zhou, Q., Kwok, O. M., & Benz, M. R. (2012). National prevalence rates of bullying victimization among students with disabilities in the United States. School Psychology Quarterly, 27(4), 210. Turner, H. A., Vanderminden, J., Finklehor, D., Hamby, S., & Shattuck, A. (2011). Disability and victimization in a national sample of children and youth. Child Maltreatment, 16(4), 275-286. Maïiano, C., Aimé, A., Salvas, M. C., Morin, A. J., & Normand, C. L. (2016). Prevalence and correlates of bullying perpetration and victimization among school-aged youth with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Research in developmental disabilities, 49, 181-195. aMinority status for all variables tested; bPast year disability-based bias victimization