Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Advertisements

Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Damage-Induced Ubiquitylation of Human RNA Polymerase II by the Ubiquitin Ligase Nedd4, but Not Cockayne Syndrome Proteins or BRCA1  Roy Anindya, Ozan.
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Communication with the Exon-Junction Complex and Activation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay by Human Upf Proteins Occur in the Cytoplasm  Guramrit Singh, Steffen.
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e6 (October 2017)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
The TRIM Family Protein KAP1 Inhibits HIV-1 Integration
SMRT Derepression by the IκB Kinase α
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
BRCA1 Is a Histone-H2A-Specific Ubiquitin Ligase
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (October 2009)
Christy J. Fryer, J.Brandon White, Katherine A. Jones  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Gareth J. Inman, Francisco J. Nicolás, Caroline S. Hill  Molecular Cell 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 85-96 (July 2011) Recruitment of TIF1γ to Chromatin via Its PHD Finger-Bromodomain Activates Its Ubiquitin Ligase and Transcriptional Repressor Activities  Eleonora Agricola, Rebecca A. Randall, Tessa Gaarenstroom, Sirio Dupont, Caroline S. Hill  Molecular Cell  Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 85-96 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Repressive Activity of TIF1γ on TGF-β Superfamily Transcriptional Responses Requires Its PHD Finger-Bromodomain (A and B) MDA-MB-231 cells containing integrated CAGA12-Luc (A) or BRE-Luc (B) and TK-Renilla reporters were transfected with individual siRNA oligos or pools and treated with the indicated ligands for 8 hr. (C) HaCaT-SRE-Luc cells were transfected with siRNAs and induced ± cytochalasin D for 7 hr. NT, nontargeting. (D) 293Ts were transfected with CAGA12-Luc and TK-Renilla along with the indicated pCS2-TIF1γ constructs. In all cases, luciferase levels were normalized to Renilla levels. In all cases the data are means and standard deviations for a representative experiment performed in triplicate. Protein overexpression and knockdown were verified by western blot. In (D), wild-type TIF1γ protein has a slower mobility due to its FLAG tag. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 TIF1γ Binding to the TGF-β-Induced PAI-1 Gene Depends on Both Ligand Activation and Smad4 (A) This figure shows qPCR of the PAI-1 Smad binding region (SBR), transcription start site (TSS), and coding region (CR) from ChIP assays using RNA Pol II, TIF1γ, and Smad4 antibodies. ChIPs were performed on extracts from MDA-MB-231 cells treated ± TGF-β for 1 hr. (B) As in (A) except extracts were additionally obtained from cells treated for 2 hr with SB-431542 after the TGF-β induction. (C) Extracts were prepared from HaCaT-TR and HaCaT-TRS4 cells treated with tetracycline (Tet) overnight and treated ± TGF-β for 1 hr. Smad4 knockdown was verified by western blot. In all cases data correspond to the average of duplicate qPCRs from a representative experiment normalized to input. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TIF1γ-Smad Complex Formation Does Not Occur on Naked DNA (A and B) Extracts were prepared from treated HaCaT-TR and HaCaT-TRS4 cells (A) or 293Ts (B). Extracts were analyzed by western blot using the indicated antibodies, either directly (Input) or after IP with protein A beads (Beads) or anti-TIF1γ antibody-coupled beads (α-TIF1γ). Note that in (B), the antibody against phosphorylated Smad3 (PSmad3) also recognizes phosphorylated Smad1 (PSmad1). Only PSmad3 interacts with TIF1γ. (C) Nuclear extracts were prepared from HaCaT cells treated ± TGF-β for 1 hr and either analyzed by western blot directly (Input) or after DNA pull-down assay using wild-type (WT) c-Jun SBR oligos or those mutated in the Smad3/Smad4 binding site (Mut). Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TIF1γ Specifically Binds an Acetylated H3 Tail in which R2 and K4 Are Unmethylated (A) Sequences of histone H3 and H4 tails. Colored residues indicate modifications analyzed. (B) Peptide pull-down using differently modified H3 and H4 peptides and extracts made from untransfected 293Ts (upper panel) or 293Ts transfected with FLAG-tagged BPTF PHD finger (middle panel) or with FLAG-tagged BRDT bromodomain (BD1; lower panel). FLAG-tagged proteins were detected by western blot and binding of endogenous TIF1γ using a TIF1γ antibody. (C) As in (B) except that extract was prepared from 293Ts stably expressing FLAG-tagged TIF1γ ΔPHD/Bromo. Endogenous TIF1γ was detected with the anti-TIF1γ antibody. (D) Peptide pull-down using extract prepared from untransfected 293Ts and H3 peptides with the indicated mutations. (E) As in (D) except that H3 peptides with single acetylated lysines or a combination of two acetylated lysines were used. (F) As in (D) except that single H3 peptides or combinations of H3 peptides were used. In all cases the lanes marked Input are extract prior to pull-down, and those marked Beads were pulled down with beads alone. Beads conjugated with peptides were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and peptides were detected by Coomassie (peptide loading). (G) A model indicating how the TIF1γ PHD finger-bromodomain binds to the H3 tail. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Histone Binding Induces TIF1γ Autoubiquitination Activity (A) In vitro ubiquitination assay. Recombinant E1, E2, and HA-Ubiquitin (HA-Ub) were incubated with purified core histones and TIF1γ purified from FLAG-TIF1γ 293Ts. Autoubiquitinated TIF1γ was detected with the HA antibody and unmodified TIF1γ with TIF1γ antibody. A Coomassie-stained gel shows purified TIF1γ (left panel). Molecular weight (MW) markers are shown in kDa. (B) Assays were performed as in (A) using 5 μl purified TIF1γ, but additionally the samples were IPed using FLAG and TIF1γ antibodies prior to western blot. (C) As in (B) but also including incubation with recombinant octamers. The histones used in the assay were western blotted using antibodies recognizing histone H3 acetylated at different lysines as indicated and are also shown stained with Coomassie. Note that the migration of H2B in the purified chicken erythrocyte histones differs slightly from that of the recombinant Xenopus histones, as previously observed (Luger et al., 1997). (D) As in (B) but including incubation with TIF1γ ΔPHD/Bromo purified from FLAG-TIF1γ ΔPHD/Bromo 293Ts. (E) 293Ts were transfected with HA-Ubiquitin and FLAG-TIF1γ and incubated overnight ± SB-431542. Extracts were IPed (IP) with FLAG-antibody and blotted as indicated. In (A) and (C), the migration of a 116 kDa marker is shown. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Smad4 Ubiquitination by TIF1γ Depends on Activation of TIF1γ by Binding to Modified Histones and on the TIF1γ PHD Finger-Bromodomain and the RING Finger (A) In vitro ubiquitination assay performed as in Figure 5A, but with the inclusion of Gal4-Smad4 as the TIF1γ substrate. Autoubiquitinated TIF1γ and ubiquitinated Gal4-Smad4 are detected in the HA blot. (B) In vivo ubiquitination assay. Extracts were prepared from 293Ts transfected with Myc-Smad4, FLAG-TIF1γ, or mutants thereof ± a plasmid expressing HA-Ubiquitin (HA-Ub). Extracts were IPed (IP) using anti-Myc antibody, and the IPs were western blotted with the indicated antibodies. Inputs and positions of molecular weight markers are shown. A lighter exposure of the Smad4 blots indicated equal loading. (C) The N-terminal TRIM domain and the C-terminal PHD-bromodomain interact in solution. 293T cells were transfected with the constructs shown. Extracts were IPed using anti-Myc antibody, and the IPs were western blotted with FLAG antibody. Inputs are shown. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model of TIF1γ Action (A–C) Model for chromatin-dependent TIF1γ ubiquitination of Smad4. The TRIM domain is indicated in yellow when TIF1γ is inactive; in active TIF1γ, it is orange. The key histone H3 modifications are labeled on both the blue box and the pink circle. The arrow indicates H3 acetylation by a HAT. SBE, Smad binding element; Ub, ubiquitin. For discussion, see text. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.020) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions