Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
RNA Ligase Structures Reveal the Basis for RNA Specificity and Conformational Changes that Drive Ligation Forward  Jayakrishnan Nandakumar, Stewart Shuman,
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Crystal Structure of Human Mre11: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Oliver Weichenrieder, Kostas Repanas, Anastassis Perrakis  Structure 
Structural Insight into Translesion Synthesis by DNA Pol II
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 
Conformation-Selective ATP-Competitive Inhibitors Control Regulatory Interactions and Noncatalytic Functions of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases  Sanjay B.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
X-Ray Crystallography Reveals a Large Conformational Change during Guanyl Transfer by mRNA Capping Enzymes  Kjell Håkansson, Aidan J. Doherty, Stewart.
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Structural Basis of RIP1 Inhibition by Necrostatins
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 1386-1398 (November 2013) Biochemical and Structural Studies of Conserved Maf Proteins Revealed Nucleotide Pyrophosphatases with a Preference for Modified Nucleotides  Anatoli Tchigvintsev, Dmitri Tchigvintsev, Robert Flick, Ana Popovic, Aiping Dong, Xiaohui Xu, Greg Brown, Wenyun Lu, Hong Wu, Hong Cui, Ludmila Dombrowski, Jeong Chan Joo, Natalia Beloglazova, Jinrong Min, Alexei Savchenko, Amy A. Caudy, Joshua D. Rabinowitz, Alexey G. Murzin, Alexander F. Yakunin  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 1386-1398 (November 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011 Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2013 Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Nucleoside Triphosphate Pyrophosphatase Activity of Purified Maf Proteins: Hydrolysis of Canonical and Modified Nucleotides The graphs show specific activities of (A) YhdE, (B) BSU28050, (C) YOR111W, and (D) ASMTL-Maf against canonical and modified nucleotides (the left and right parts of the graph, respectively). The reaction mixtures contained 0.2 mM substrate, 2 mM Co2+, and 0.1–0.5 μg of enzyme. Results are means ± SD from at least two independent determinations. The molecular structures of positive Maf substrates are shown on the right side of the graph. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of the Maf Overexpression on the E. coli Nucleoside Monophosphate Metabolome LC-MS analysis of the intracellular nucleoside monophosphates in the E. coli strains containing the empty expression plasmid or overexpressing the wild-type or inactive Maf proteins. Results are means ± SD from at least two independent determinations. See also Figure S3. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crystal Structures of Maf Proteins (A–D) Overall structures of the protomers are: (A) ASMTL-Maf (PDB code 2P5X), (B) BSU28050 (PDB code 4HEB), (C) Tb-Maf1 (PDB code 2AMH), and (D) YceF (PDB code 4JHC). (E) The ASMTL-Maf dimers (two orientations related by 180° rotation). The ribbon diagrams of two monomers are in green and cyan, and the bound phosphate molecule is shown as balls with oxygen in red and phosphorus in orange. See also Table S2. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Maf Proteins: Nucleotide Pyrophosphatase Activity of Purified Mutant Proteins (A–E) Mutant proteins shown are (A) YhdE, (B) BSU28050, (C) YOR111W, (D) ASMTL-Maf, and (E) YceF. The assays contained 0.3 mM UTP in (A) through (D) or 0.2 mM m7GTP (E), 2 mM Co2+ in (A) and (C), 5 mM Co2+ in (B) and (D), or 0.2 mM Co2+ (E) and 0.03–0.5 μg of protein. Results are means ± SD from at least two independent determinations. See also Figures S1 and S5. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Active Site of Maf Proteins Close-up view of the active site of (A) ASMTL-Maf with bound phosphate, (B) BSU28050, (C) Tb-Maf1 with bound sulfates and metal ions, and (D) YceF. The protein side chains are shown as green sticks along a protein ribbon (gray). In (A), the bound phosphate is shown as orange sticks with red indicating oxygen. In (C), the bound sulfates (S1 and S2) are shown as yellow sticks with red indicating oxygen, and the bound metal ions (M1 and M2) are shown as the magenta balls. In the YceF active site in (D), the side chain of Glu154 is incompletely modeled because it was disordered. See also Figures S1 and S4–S6. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structural Basis of Different Substrate Specificity of Two Maf Subfamilies (A) Structural superposition of the substrate binding sites of BSU28050 (cyan; YhdE subfamily) and Tb-Maf1 (magenta; YceF subfamily). Side chains of conserved residues, as well as phosphate (orange) and sulfate (yellow) ions bound to BSU28050 and Tb-Maf1, respectively, are shown as sticks. Also shown are the bound Mn2+ ions (M1 and M2) and the surface of the Tb-Maf1. In BSU28050, the side chain of the conserved Arg13 is located in the base-binding pocket, but it can be flipped away without altering the main chain conformation. (B) The base-binding pocket of the Tb-Maf1 (YceF subfamily) with manually docked m7GTP (dark green carbons). The predicted substrate specificity determinants are the Val173 main chain amide, Gln90, and Glu174 (labeled and also shown with potential H-bonds). (C) The base-binding pocket of the BSU28050 (YhdE subfamily) with manually docked dTTP (light green carbons). The predicted substrate specificity determinants are Arg13, Thr71, and Gln153 (labeled and also shown with potential H-bonds). The side chain conformations of Arg13 and Gln153 have been changed to different rotamers compared to the original structure shown in (A). See also Figure S7. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Proposed Role of Maf Proteins in House Cleaning and Cell Division Arrest Top: cell division arrest. Nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphatase activity of Maf proteins from the YhdE subfamily reduces the intracellular pool of dTTP, resulting in inhibition of DNA synthesis/replication and delaying cell division. Bottom: house cleaning. In the cells, the modified RNA bases are produced by specific modifying enzymes, and they enter the cellular nucleotide pool as nucleoside monophosphates during RNA degradation or repair. The modified nucleosides are then phosphorylated by various nucleotide kinases to the respective triphosphates (Ψ, m5CTP, m5UTP, and m7GTP), whose incorporation into RNA is prevented by Maf proteins. Chemistry & Biology 2013 20, 1386-1398DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.011) Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions