Biometry before catarct surgery

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Advertisements

A-scan Biometry Introduction:-
Ultrasound is a high frequency sound that you cannot hear, but it can be emitted and detected by special machines. Ultrasound travels freely through fluid.
Biometry: Long & Short eyes Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
In-the-Bag Toric IOL for Correction of Astigmatism in Keratoconus and after Corneal Surgery Bart T.H. van Dooren, M.D., Ph.D Ilse E.M.A. Mol, M.D. Department.
Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology,
Dominic McHugh MD FRCS London, UK
IOL power calculation following keratorefractive surgery
Cataract Surgery Using Biaspheric IOLs in Patients With Corneal Irregularities James P. Gills, MD St. Luke’s Cataract & Laser Institute Tarpon Springs.
IOLs & Biometry Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
INTRA-OCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION IN POST- REFRACTIVE SURGERY ASIAN EYES USING THE HAIGIS-L FORMULA Dr Daphne Han, FRCS Dr Wei-Han Chua, FRCS Dr Peter.
Choosing the Proper Power for the IOL
IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.
REFRACTIVE ASPECTS OF CATARACT SURGERY. OPTICAL CORRECTIONS AFTER CATARACT EXTRACTION.
Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.
Refractive Errors & methods of correction M. F. Al Fayez, MD, FRCS.
Correction of Astigmatism with Toric IOL After Previous RK
JAIRO E. HOYOS, MD MELANIA CIGALES, MD Instituto Oftalmológico Hoyos Barcelona - SPAIN.
G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,
PIGGYBACK IMPLANTATION OF FOR HIGH HYPEROPIA 24 MONTHS FOLLOW UP JL. FEBBRARO I.VIELPEAU, F. KRIFA, S.BERBACHE, S. GANEM Department of Ophthalmology S.
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2012 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan
For Accommodative Lenses Deepak Chitkara, M.B., ChB. D.O.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2011 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan Resident, Hong Kong Eye Hospital.
Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes
Phacoemulsification some Basic Ideas…
INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION BY IMMERSION A-SCAN BIOMETRY VERSUS CONTACT A-SCAN BIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS BEFORE CATARACT SURGERY Burak Bilgin**, M.D.,
Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.
Kaori Morii, M.D. Shinji Miura, M.D, Ph.D. Dept. of Ophthalmology, Asagiri Hospital, Hyogo, JPN We have no financial interest. This retrospective study.
EVALUATION OF REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION
Jamie Ng, Marcus Tan, Lennard Thean National University Health System
Edmondo Borasio Moorfields Eye Hospital Dubai Results of BESSt 2 biometry and Borasio Myopic/Hyperopic Regression (BMR / BHR) IOL POWER CLUB – 9 th ANNUAL.
IOL Calculations Based on Partial Biometry in Humanitarian Missions Joseph Schmitz, MD Kimberly Davis, MD, FACS Scott McClatchey, MD The authors have no.
Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.
Comparision of ultrasound A- scan with optical A-scan Dr.Somshekar.N Consultant Refractive Services Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore No Finanacial Interest.
Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.
COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.
Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.
Nebraska Laser Eye Associates Mark Johnston MD FRCSC
John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.
Poster# P36 Comparison of Techniques of Measuring Anterior Chamber Depth and Corneal Curvature in Indian Eyes Sujata Das, MS, FRCS Anjula Kumari, B.Optom.
Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.
Changes of Axial Length After LASIK Surgery: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study
Marilyn Watkins-Ramdin, COMT ROUB
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Premium IOL May be one way to achieve the visual goals of selected patients I describe some pearls for premium IOL implantation to help ensure that we.
Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery
Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.
The authors have no financial interest.
Aug 11, 2017 Comparison of predictive accuracy on Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and swpt-source optical coherence tomographry (SS-OCT) Choun-Ki.
Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.
Hôpital Ophtalmique Universitaire
Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts
Tamer M. El-Raggal, MD, PhD, FRCSEd Magrabi Eye Hospital, Cairo
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Samir I. Sayegh, MD, PhD, FACS 1
Aphakia and its correction
Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.
Naval Medical Center, San Diego
The authors have no financial interest
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Examination Techniques for Accuracy and Efficiency
성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.
Deepak Vayalambrone FRCOphth
The authors have no financial interest
Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu
Presentation transcript:

Biometry before catarct surgery Ulrich Spandau Department of Ophthalmology, University of Uppsala, Sweden

I will talk about: A-scan biometry – IOL Master biometry Examination of a patient IOL talk with the patienten Clinical examples Tipps & tricks

How good is today the quality of the calculation of an IOL ? Question: How many patients with target refraction emmetropia become hyperopic? Svar: 40% Question : How many patients land at ± 0,5D? Svar: Only 72% Question : How many patients land at ≥ 10D Svar: 40 patients Europeiska katarakt register (n=142572 patienter i 2014)

IOL-Master (laser, similar to TV) Difficult measurement for ultrasound Easy measurement för IOL master IOL-Master (laser, similar to TV) A-scan (ultrasound, (similar to radio) Ultraljud mäter med ljud, IOL master mäter med ljus Difficult measurement for IOL master Easy measurement for ultrasound

Ultrasound: A-scan Measures from cornea to ILM ILM

IOL Master Measures from cornea to RPE RPE 6

Important Biometry with PMMA IOL: Big mistake with ultrasound; small mistake with laser (IOL Master) Biometry with silicone oil filled eye: Big mistake with ultrasound (eye becomes 30% longer); small mistake with laser (IOL Master) Caution: In case of mature cataract=> ultrasound; in case of PMMA-IOL and silicone oil =>IOL Master Allt som är vattenfylld (biologisk, t.e.x matur katarakt) ultraljud; vid IOL, vid silikonolja IOL Master 7

IOL Master biometry Oculus Dexter Oculus Vänster IOL formula Three important parameters for formula AL=Axial length K=Keratometry Oculus Dexter Eye status Different lins types Oculus Vänster OD=Oculus dexter och OS=Oculus vänster; Vänster alla paramter av formeln AL, k1, k2

IOL formula Haigis Hoffer Holladay SRK

SRK Donald R. Sanders, PhD, MD; John A. Retzlaff, MD; Manus C. Kraff, MD SRK/T (Teoretisk)

SRK I functions well for 22.0 – 24.5 SRK II was developed for long and short eyes: < 20.0mm => add +3 to A constant 20.00 – 20.99 => add +2 to A constant 21.00 – 21.99 => add +1 to A constant 22.00 – 24.5 old SRK I formel > 24.5mm => add -0,5 to A konstant Problem: 20.99mm => add +3 BUT 21.00mm => add +2 => Development of SRK/T

IOL formula P= A – 2,5 x L – 0,9 x (K1+K2)/2 P= IOL power in emmetropia A= IOL constant L= axial length in mm K= corneal curvature i diopters

IOL formula contains 1) Keratometry 2) Axial length 3) A-constant

A-scan biometry Formula Tre essential parameter Different lins types Lins typ A

Examination of patient Examine ALLWAYS BOTH EYES 1) Autorefractor 2) Glasses 3) Biometry 4) Function of eye Viktigast är autorefraktor och biometri

Biometry: Status of eyes Pseudophakic Phakic

Measurement of axial length with IOL master

Choose correct eye status

Empty space=> do a manual entry

Target refraction

Target refraction Cataract surgery first eye ? OR Cataract surgery second eye?

Cataract surgery first eye Free choice for target refraction

Cataract surgery second eye Do an objective refracation of the first eye Target refraction of the second eye shall correlate with refraction of the first eye Example: Pseudophakic eye: -2,0D, phakic eye: +1,0D, which vilken target refraction? (-2,0D)

Target refraction => Talk with patient Required measurements: Refraction of eyes Refraction of glasses and biometry

Example 1 Patient is sailor and wishes to read his instruments in a disctance of 1,2m: Target refraction? Formula: 1/X => 1/1,2m=0,8D

Example 2: Hyperopia Refraction: +8,0D Patient wears his glasses the whole time Plan light hyperopia: +0,25-0,5D He/she will no become myopic

Example 3: Grav myopia Refraction: -8,0D Patient wears glasses constantly Plan myopia: -1,0D Patient does not want to be hyperopic

Example 4: Reading myopia Refraction: -3,0D Patient reads without glasses Target refraction: -3,0D

Caution: Hyperopic shift According to the cataract register many eyes become hyperopic after cataract surgery (cirka +0,5D) => In case of emmetropia plan for -0,5D

My favourite target refraction Dominant eye: Emmetropia Not-dominant eye: Light myopia (-0,75sph)

Wrong postoperative target refraction : Where is the mistake? Everything between +/- 1,5D is acceptable Double-check: Did I implant correct IOL? Was the biometry correct? => repeat biometry postoperatively (pseudophakic acryl) Do OCT to exclude a membrane 5 det borde vara rätt

Postoperative anisometropia: Surgical action 1) IOL change 2) Implantation of an add-ON IOL

Lins change

Video: Lens change

add-ON IOL Photocourtesy 1stQ, Tyskland

Tipps and tricks

Caution in case of white cataract !! Swinging flash-light test: RAPD pos => no surgery RAPD neg => surgery

Tipps in case of mature cataract Difficult to measure axial length with A- scan: Change settings to ”aphakic” BUT: AXL becomes too short Add 0,3mm to AXL

Caution in case of LASIK!! In case of LASIK surgery => Use formula Haigis-L

Caution!! Hard contact lenses => no contact lens use for 1 month, otherwise wrong biometry

Conclusion A-scan: measures from epithelium to ILM IOL Master: measures from epithelium to RPE Biometry: Are there strange values (for example IOL of 50D, AXL of 17mm)? Dialogue with patient regarding lins choice (In case of reading myopia => target refraction: -3,0D) 3 är näthinnan avlossad?

Thank you for your attention