Preparing for CAEP Accreditation: Standard 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Co-Teaching as a Methodology in Teacher Preparation
Advertisements

1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
Developing the Learning Contract
Family Interventions: Will What We Know Now Change What We Do in the Future? Susan M. Sheridan University of Nebraska-Lincoln Discussant.
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Angie Gant, Ed.D. Truett-McConnell College 1.
Carroll County Public Schools Gifted & Talented. On February 28 th, 2012, the Maryland State Board of Education approved regulations that set the minimum.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Building on Strong Foundations: CAEP Standards 2 & 4 OCTEO Spring Conference,
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Collaborative Model of Social Work Education with Strong University – Agency Partnerships Michael A. Patchner, Ph.D. Indiana University School of Social.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Graduate School of Education Assessment October 10, 2013.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Accreditation and STEM Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
The Power of Partnerships One College’s journey to growth and understanding…
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Common Standards August 19, :30 am-3:00 pm.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Update Stevie Chepko, CAEP Sr. VP for Accreditation.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
CAEP Standard 2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP Ann Nutter Coffman, National Education Association CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Laura Frizzell Coastal Plains RESA 1.
COLLEGE PARTNERSHIP COMMITTEE HANDBOOK COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN SERVICES WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY.
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Lessons from a CAEP Early-Adopter
OCTEO April 1, 2016 Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Preparing for your Site Visit
Polices, procedures & protocols
Eastern’s Assessment System
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Partnership for Practice
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
Elayne Colón and Tom Dana
TN: TEACH AACTE Grant TN TEACH: The TN EPP Assistive and Collaborative Help Network.
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
STANDARD 2/A.2 Clinical Partnerships and Practice
CAEP Standards.
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
NYSATE/NYCATE FallCon: CAEP Accreditation
PROGRAM REVIEW AS PART OF THE CAEP ACCREDITATION PROCESS
The Next Step in Transforming
SRH & HIV Linkages Agenda
Consortium of State Organizations for Texas Teacher Education
Standard Four Program Impact
Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010
Shannon Cuff, Ph.D. Drury University
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Clinical Educator and Teacher Candidate Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Standard one: revisions
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Utah Leah Voorhies Utah State Board of Education Jennifer McKenzie
Training Chapter for the Advanced Field Experience Form (Pre-CPAST
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for CAEP Accreditation: Standard 2 Field Supervisors Meeting November 21, 2017

Agenda Overview of CAEP Standards for Initial Level In-Depth Look at Standard 2 – Small Group Partnerships for Clinical Preparation Clinical Educators Clinical Experiences Technology and Diversity Themes Concerns/Areas for Improvement Associated with Standard 2

Review of Standard 2 Components How are we meeting this component of the standard? What evidence would indicate we are meeting this component of the standard?   What areas of this component could be problematic for us?  What suggestions do you have for addressing these areas of concern?

Technology and Diversity Theme How can we document candidate use of technology throughout their programs, including clinical experiences? How can we document student teachers require P-12 student use of technology? How can we document diversity in clinical experiences? Diverse placements? Diverse clinical educators?

Problematic Components for EPPs Undergoing CAEP Visits Advisory committee is university-driven with no collaborative efforts from P-12 partners. No formal agreements with P-12 partners were presented. No evidence was presented that university and P-12 partners establish mutual expectations for candidate entry, preparation, and exit from clinical experiences. Data were not reported for purposes of modifying/improving clinical experiences.

Problematic Components for EPPs Undergoing CAEP Visits No evidence was presented to document the depth, breadth, and diversity of clinical experiences. No evidence was presented to document clinical experiences are deliberate, purposeful, sequential, and assessed using performance-based measures across programs. No evidence was presented to document performance evaluations of university supervisors, P-12 supervisors, and candidates.

Problematic Components for EPPs Undergoing CAEP Visits The EPP does not provide evidence of processes, procedures, and systems needed to reliably capture data that measures the depth, breadth, diversity, coherence, and duration of clinical experiences. No evidence was presented to document clinical supervisor training. Limited evidence of a shared partnership model was presented.

Problematic Components for EPPs Undergoing CAEP Visits Limited data were presented to indicate how candidates’ minimum of one diverse field placement adequately integrates affirming pedagogies.