What Is the Self-Study Instructional Audit?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
Advertisements

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
DDMs for School Counselors RTTT Final Summit April 7, 2014 Craig Waterman & Kate Ducharme.
Presentation Topics School Improvement Plans Combing Title I Schoolwide with SIPs Submitting Plans & Required Documents Districtwide Initiatives Training.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Adapted from guidance presented on August 2013 by Alexandra Pressley, Associate in Education Improvement Services NYSED Local Assistance Plan Schools:
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Secondary Assessment & Grade Reporting
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Reading, Writing & Math at Grade Level
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Revisions Overview
Evaluation Updates.
EDU 390 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 390 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
EDU 390 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
EDU 390 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Defining Quality Assurance: What It Takes to Make a Good Contact
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
From Compliance to Impact: Utilizing the School Systems Review as part of a Continuous Improvement Process Ann LaPointe, Educational Improvement Consultant.
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Common Core State Standards
Background on Provincial Report Cards
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
An Overview April 2012.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems
Making Middle Grades Work
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher Training Chapter for the Candidate Preservice Assessment for Student Teachers (CPAST) Form Developed by the VARI-EPP*
Presentation transcript:

What Is the Self-Study Instructional Audit? An Overview of the Self-Study Instructional Audit Tool Deborah Davis ACC/NW Lab Jon Paden EED

What Is the Roadmap for This Session? Quick description of the Instructional Audit Tool as a basis for the Self-Study Instructional Audit Tool Characteristics of the Self-Study and small group exploration of the Tool Next steps and ways to approach the SS-IAT

What Is an Instructional Audit? A state-selected, independent, audit team conducts a review of district instructional practices - using the Instructional Audit Tool (IAT) Districts meeting certain criteria qualify to receive an instructional audit (e.g., AYP Level 2 or greater) State law establishes the practice to examine 6 domains

What Are the Six Domains? Curriculum Assessment Instruction Supportive learning environment Professional development Leadership

What happens during the Instructional Audit? Audit team develops a snapshot of district instructional practices by the school level: Document review Focus groups & interviews with staff and students Instruction observation The team combines these data sources to triangulate evidence and assign the rating “Meets” or “Does Not Meet”

What Happens As a Result of the Instructional Audit? The audit team produces a Report of Findings for the Commissioner’s review This report complements other data (e.g., SBAs, district conversations) to develop a plan: E.g., stay the course, give recommendations, direct instructional actions, redirect funds for student learning benefit, replace personnel

Is The Instructional Audit Tool Valid? Yes Validation study completed through the Alaska Comprehensive Center, Northwest Lab, and WestEd in 2008 The conclusion: Strong correlation between the audit tool’s assessment of a district and the district students’ proficiency levels

What Is This New Self-Study Instructional Audit Tool? (SS-IAT) Based on Alaska’s Instructional Audit Tool Incorporates changes made to Instructional Audit Tool based on considerable feedback from audited districts To be implemented by districts and guided by an EED Technical Assistance Coach

What are Similarities between the IAT and SS-IAT? Evidence-based Provide diagnostic data to help with creation of improvement plans Based on the six domains and 44 key elements within domains (including parent and community involvement key elements)

And The Differences? IAT conducted by external team IAT conducted over one week IAT uses a dichotomous rating SS-IAT conducted by internal team SS-IAT may take several weeks or months SS-IAT uses a 4-point rubric

So, What Is The SS-IAT? An evidence-based self-study A way to build awareness, buy-in and support for improvement efforts The end product is not a score; instead it is the identification of current strengths and limitations

Your SS-IAT assignment: Number off to six Curriculum Assessment Instruction* Learning Environment Professional Development Leadership* 1. Skim pages 2-9 2. Review materials for your assigned domain 3. Teach home group about your domain 4. Discuss if and how you might use it

What are the Self-Assessment Materials? Overview & Step-by-Step pgs. 2-5 Sources of Evidence pgs. 6-7 Glossary pgs. 8-9 Introduction to Domain & Guiding Questions pgs. 10-46 Domain Rubric “ Domain Summary “

Options for use of the SS-IAT One domain area Some, but not all domains All domain areas

Who is involved? SS-IAT is guided by: An EED-trained technical assistance coach* The Self-Study is conducted by: entire school staff or small group of staff such as the leadership team *or trained district staff in winter 2010

Getting started Review the rubric Discuss the guiding questions Locate the evidence necessary to make ratings for each domain Reach consensus on ratings Determine strengths and areas for improvement

Next steps…by September Technical Assistance Coaches will be trained to guide school teams Tool will be available electronically

Q & A Can we do this self-study process on our own? Does the self-study help with creation of improvement plans? Is it best to do all the Domain areas at once?

Self-Study and PLCs… …a learning community consists of a group of people who take an active, reflective, collaborative, learning-oriented, and growth-promoting approach towards the mysteries, the problems and perplexities of teaching and learning. Mitchell & Sackney, 2001