Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Advertisements

Protein Structure Fitting and Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Density
Lights, X-Rays, Oxygen! Cell
Using Enhanced Sampling and Structural Restraints to Refine Atomic Structures into Low-Resolution Electron Microscopy Maps  Harish Vashisth, Georgios.
Nir London, Ora Schueler-Furman  Structure 
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Energetic Pathway Sampling in a Protein Interaction Domain
Biochemical Studies of Mycobacterial Fatty Acid Methyltransferase: A Catalyst for the Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel  Nektaria Petronikolou, Satish K.
Hahnbeom Park, Frank DiMaio, David Baker  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Blocking HIV-1 gp120 at the Phe43 Cavity: If the Extension Fits…
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Srayanta Mukherjee, Yang Zhang  Structure 
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
DNA Nanomechanics in the Nucleosome
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
The Origin of CDR H3 Structural Diversity
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Yang Liu, Perry Palmedo, Qing Ye, Bonnie Berger, Jian Peng 
Frank Alber, Michael F. Kim, Andrej Sali  Structure 
Structural Determinants of Transmembrane Helical Proteins
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Accommodating Protein Dynamics in the Modeling of Chemical Crosslinks
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2018)
Grace W. Tang, Russ B. Altman  Structure 
Veronica Salmaso, Mattia Sturlese, Alberto Cuzzolin, Stefano Moro 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Srayanta Mukherjee, Yang Zhang  Structure 
GPCR-I-TASSER: A Hybrid Approach to G Protein-Coupled Receptor Structure Modeling and the Application to the Human Genome  Jian Zhang, Jianyi Yang, Richard.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Sergey Nepomnyachiy, Nir Ben-Tal, Rachel Kolodny  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Conservation of Protein Structure over Four Billion Years
Nir London, Ora Schueler-Furman  Structure 
Geometry-Based Sampling of Conformational Transitions in Proteins
Solution Structure of Sco1
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Absence of Ion-Binding Affinity in the Putatively Inactivated Low-[K+] Structure of the KcsA Potassium Channel  Céline Boiteux, Simon Bernèche  Structure 
Protein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Remodeling KRAS Structure
Mechanism of NH4+ Recruitment and NH3 Transport in Rh Proteins
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
A Critical Comparative Assessment of Predictions of Protein-Binding Sites for Biologically Relevant Organic Compounds  Ke Chen, Marcin J. Mizianty, Jianzhao.
Atomic-Level Protein Structure Refinement Using Fragment-Guided Molecular Dynamics Conformation Sampling  Jian Zhang, Yu Liang, Yang Zhang  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Assessing Exhaustiveness of Stochastic Sampling for Integrative Modeling of Macromolecular Structures  Shruthi Viswanath, Ilan E. Chemmama, Peter Cimermancic,
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
James E. Milner-White, James D. Watson, Guoying Qi, Steven Hayward 
Vilas Menon, Brinda K. Vallat, Joseph M. Dybas, Andras Fiser  Structure 
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Chengfei Yan, Xianjin Xu, Xiaoqin Zou  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2162-2170 (November 2015) ConTemplate Suggests Possible Alternative Conformations for a Query Protein of Known Structure  Aya Narunsky, Sergey Nepomnyachiy, Haim Ashkenazy, Rachel Kolodny, Nir Ben-Tal  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2162-2170 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Maximal RMSD between Two PDB Structures of the Same Protein The size of the maximal RMSD between two structures of the same protein, in a set of 8,322 protein chains; less than 1 Å for the vast majority of proteins. Structure 2015 23, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Proteins that Have One Conformation in Common Often Share Additional Conformations (A) All protein pairs with at least one similar conformation found in a collection of 246 proteins. Out of 30,135 protein pairs, 79 (0.3%) were found to have a similar conformation. (B) Of the 79 protein pairs that share a similar conformation, 45 (57%) have additional conformations in common. Structure 2015 23, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ConTemplate Methodology The query protein is represented by a red point, and other PDB structures are represented by black points. (A) In the first step, ConTemplate uses GESAMT (Krissinel, 2012) to identify proteins with structural similarity to the query. The blue circle represents the structural vicinity of the query; it encircles the collection of proteins sharing the query’s structure. The number of proteins in this vicinity depends on the RMSD and Q score thresholds (the default values are listed); the user can configure these. (B) Using BLAST (Altschul et al., 1990), ConTemplate suggests alternative conformations of the proteins detected in (A), including the query; the gray edges connect proteins that share, in essence, the same sequence (but have different structures). Note that some proteins may have several suggested conformations, while others have none; the number of these conformations depends on the sequence-identity threshold (the default value is listed). The user can configure this threshold. (C) Clustering the proteins found in (B). Five clusters are shown. Their centers are used to model alternative (suggested) conformations of the query. The user can configure the number of clusters. Structure 2015 23, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Modeling Conformational Changes in the Ribose-Binding Protein Upper: Using the known structure of the open (ligand-free) protein as a query (Query, PDB: 1URP) and reproducing its closed, ligand-bound conformation (Target, PDB: 2DRI). Lower: Using the known structure of the closed conformation as a query and reproducing the open conformation. The RMSD between the two conformations is 4.1 Å. The maximal RMSD between the query and similar proteins is set to 2.0 Å, and the minimal Q score is set to 0.4. In the upper panel the number of clusters is set to 2. In the lower panel we consider 20 clusters because the target is a rare conformation. (A and D) Selecting proteins with structural similarity to the query; only one is shown here (Similar, PDB: 3M9X, 1RPJ). (B and E) Suggesting alternative conformations of the proteins detected in step 1; only one is shown here (Template, PDB: 3MA0, 1GUB). (C and F) Modeling suggested conformations of the query using the conformations detected in step 2 as templates; only one is shown here (Model). Structure 2015 23, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A Network Representation of the ConTemplate Results Could Suggest Pathways between Conformations and Help Eliminate Irrelevant Conformations The network is presented using Cytoscape (Saito et al., 2012). The ribose-bound conformation (blue) was used as a query. The target (red) is the known ribose-free conformation. The gray nodes correspond to models obtained using ConTemplate. Two nodes are connected by an edge if the RMSD between the two corresponding structures is under 2.5 Å. The length of the connecting edge is proportional to the RMSD between the connected structures. The outlier nodes (bottom right) correspond to models obtained using templates that are unrelated to the ribose-binding protein; these are presumably irrelevant conformations. Structure 2015 23, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.08.018) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions