© Crown copyright Met Office Some thoughts on s12 stratocumulus feedback Adrian Lock EUCLIPSE WP3 meeting, Toulouse, April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
Advertisements

© Crown copyright 2006Page 1 CFMIP II sensitivity experiments Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Johannes Quaas (MPI) Tomoo Ogura (NIES) With thanks.
© Crown copyright Met Office Towards understanding the mechanisms responsible for different cloud-climate responses in GCMs. Mark Webb, Adrian Lock (Met.
PBL simulated from different PBL Schemes in WRF during DICE
Low clouds in the atmosphere: Never a dull moment Stephan de Roode (GRS) stratocumulus cumulus.
Lecture 7-8: Energy balance and temperature (Ch 3) the diurnal cycle in net radiation, temperature and stratification the friction layer local microclimates.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 RF01/RF02: LES sensitivity studies Adrian Lock and Eoin Whelan.
Relationships between wind speed, humidity and precipitating shallow cumulus convection Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens* UCLA - Department of Atmospheric.
© Crown copyright Met Office Met Office SCM and CRM results Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK.
THE HADLEY CIRCULATION (1735): global sea breeze HOT COLD Explains: Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) Wet tropics, dry poles Problem: does not account.
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 2.
The scheme: A short intro Some relevant case results Why a negative feedback? EDMF-DualM results for the CFMIP-GCSS intercomparison case: Impacts of a.
Lecture 6. EPS 5: 23 Sep Review the concept of the barometric law (hydrostatic balance: each layer of atmosphere must support the weight of the.
Review of the Boundary Layer
Warning! In this unit, we switch from thinking in 1-D to 3-D on a rotating sphere Intuition from daily life doesn’t work nearly as well for this material!
Towards stability metrics for cloud cover variation under climate change Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton, Matt Wyant, Peter Blossey University of Washington.
Observed Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Many thanks to: Nolan Atkins, Chris Bretherton, Robin Hogan.
Earth-Atmosphere Energy Balance Earth's surface absorbs the 51 units of shortwave and 96 more of longwave energy units from atmospheric gases and clouds.
© University of Reading 2007www.reading.ac.uk RMetS Student Conference, Manchester September 2008 Boundary layer ventilation by mid-latitude cyclones Victoria.
Lapse Rates and Stability of the Atmosphere
The representation of stratocumulus with eddy diffusivity closure models Stephan de Roode KNMI.
© Crown copyright Met Office CFMIP-2 techniques for understanding cloud feedbacks in climate models. Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) CFMIP/GCSS BLWG.
Thermodynamics, Buoyancy, and Vertical Motion Temperature, Pressure, and Density Buoyancy and Static Stability Adiabatic “Lapse Rates” Convective Motions.
Effects of different surface types and human activities.
+ Atmospheric Moisture Chapter 4. + Learning Targets LT #1: I can describe the movement of water through the hydrologic cycle. LT #2: I can summarize.
1 The Thermodynamic Diagram Adapted by K. Droegemeier for METR 1004 from Lectures Developed by Dr. Frank Gallagher III OU School of Meteorology.
Cumulus Clouds. What goes on inside a cumulus cloud?
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
Cloud Feedbacks on Climate: A Challenging Scientific Problem Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography Fermilab Colloquium May 12, 2010.
Boundary Layer Convection Convection in the boundary layer occurs to transport heat moisture, and momentum from surface to free atmosphere Two common scenarios:
1) What does this tool measure?. 2) What does this tool measure?
Condensation in the Atmosphere The atmosphere contains a mixture of dry air and a variable amount of water vapor (0-4% or 0-30 g/kg) An air parcel is said.
Introduction to Cloud Dynamics We are now going to concentrate on clouds that form as a result of air flows that are tied to the clouds themselves, i.e.
Air Pressure and Winds. Atmospheric Pressure  What causes air pressure to change in the horizontal?  Why does the air pressure change at the surface?
Xin Xi Feb. 28. Basics  Convective entrainment : The buoyant thermals from the surface layer rise through the mixed layer, and penetrate (with enough.
The ASTEX Lagrangian model intercomparison case Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen TU Delft, Netherlands.
Analysis of Turbulence Development in the Morning
Large-Eddy Simulations of the Nocturnal Low-Level Jet M.A. Jiménez Universitat de les Illes Balears 4th Meso-NH user’s meeting, Toulouse April 2007.
Key Terms and Concepts ELR--Environmental Lapse Rate 5°C-6.5°C/1000 m – temperature of the STILL air as you ascend through the troposphere. ALR--Adiabatic.
Lecture 15, Slide 1 Physical processes affecting stratocumulus Siems et al
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
Large Eddy Simulation of Low Cloud Feedback to a 2-K SST Increase Anning Cheng 1, and Kuan-Man Xu 2 1. AS&M, Inc., 2. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton,
Boundary Layer Clouds.
AOS 100: Weather and Climate Instructor: Nick Bassill Class TA: Courtney Obergfell.
Met Office GPCI simulations Adrian Lock. © Crown copyright UK Met Office simulations in GPCI  HadGAM1 climate – for IPCC AR4  38 levels (~300m at 1km),
Exam 2 Review AOS 121 November Geostrophic Balance and Geostrophic Winds Balance between the pressure gradient force and Coriolis force Will.
The simplifed momentum equations Height coordinatesPressure coordinates.
© Crown copyright Met Office CGILS: Met Office LES results Adrian Lock, Met Office, UK.
Coupled vs. Decoupled Boundary Layers in VOCALS-REx Chris Jones and Chris Bretherton Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Dave Leon.
Buoyancy, Lapse Rate Stability & Convection. Lecture 6. EPS 5: 09 Feb Review the concept of the barometric law (hydrostatic balance: each layer.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 Damian Wilson, 12 th October 2005 Assessment of model performance and potential improvements using CloudNet data.
Observed Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer
EUCLIPSE Toulouse meeting April 2012 Roel Neggers Process-level evaluation at selected grid-points: Constraining a system of interacting parameterizations.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
Stratocumulus-topped Boundary Layer
A Case Study of Decoupling in Stratocumulus Xue Zheng MPO, RSMAS 03/26/2008.
© Crown copyright Met Office CFMIP-GCSS Intercomparison of SCM/LES (CGILS) Results for the HadGEM2 SCM Mark Webb and Adrian Lock (Met Office) EUCLIPSE/GCSS.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Precipitating Shallow Cumulus Case Intercomparison For the 9th GCSS Boundary Layer Cloud Workshop, September 2006, GISS.
11.2 Properties of the atmosphere. Temperature A measure of the average kinetic energy of the particles in a material. A measure of the average kinetic.
THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION from LES and bulk theory Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens University of California, Los Angeles.
Condensation in the Atmosphere
Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol – Wilcox, 2010 The semi-direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols.
Condensation in the Atmosphere
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
Condensation in the Atmosphere
Statistical vs. Physical Adaptation
Stability and Cloud Development
Wind Velocity One of the effects of wind speed is to dilute continuously released pollutants at the point of emission. Whether a source is at the surface.
Chapter 11 Section 7 How do winds form?
Presentation transcript:

© Crown copyright Met Office Some thoughts on s12 stratocumulus feedback Adrian Lock EUCLIPSE WP3 meeting, Toulouse, April 2012

© Crown copyright Met Office

Subsidence pdfs: HadGEM2 vs CGILS s11 s12 Mean w unchanged

© Crown copyright Met Office Why do the LES robustly show a significant positive feedback at s12 when subsidence unchanged?

© Crown copyright Met Office Why the positive feedback at s12 with subsidence kept constant? Robust changes with +2K: 1)Cloud is warmer greater upward LW flux at cloud top more cloud-top cooling more entrainment thinner cloud? Actually find downward LW flux increases too and balances almost exactly cloud-top cooling unchanged

© Crown copyright Met Office Why the positive feedback at s12 with subsidence kept constant? Robust changes with +2K: 1)Cloud is warmer greater upward LW flux at cloud top more cloud-top cooling? Actually find downward LW flux increases too and balances almost exactly cloud-top cooling unchanged 2)Surface LH flux increases (assuming unchanged RH, U, T 1 -T surf ): LHF = c h (q 1 -q sat (T surf )) ~ c h (RH 1 q sat (T 1 )-q sat (T surf )) 3)Δq more negative (larger RH in the PBL dominates larger dq sat /dT in warm free atmosphere): (2)+(3) if entrainment rate unchanged, expect stronger LH fluxes throughout PBL: LH flux

© Crown copyright Met Office Impact of enhanced LH fluxes Buoyancy flux = α wθ l + β wq T wq T term is most important in the cloud layer (where β is much larger) Larger wq T larger buoyancy flux more turbulent PBL more entrainment of dry air thinner cloud positive cloud feedback Do the steps of this argument hold up?

© Crown copyright Met Office LH flux – entrainment feedback? Larger wq T larger buoyancy flux more turbulent PBL more entrainment of dry air thinner cloud positive cloud feedback … more entrainment of dry air… should also deeper PBL (given identical subsidence) but cloud-top drops less entrainment!

© Crown copyright Met Office LH flux – entrainment feedback? MetO LEM fluxes after 3 days LH flux still larger throughout PBL, despite lower inversion (larger Δq must dominate reduced w e ) Buoyancy flux weaker (consistent with reduced w e ) But why reduced w e, to less than in the control?

© Crown copyright Met Office Initial adjustment Entrainment is larger initially (<first 6 hours), driven by larger buoyancy flux, as expected cloud thins (+ve feedback), as expected BUT cloud becomes optically thinner in LW too: reduced LW cloud-top cooling reduced buoyancy flux reduced turbulence reduced entrainment cloud-top falls back (relative to control)

© Crown copyright Met Office Balanced state So, despite enhanced LH fluxes at all levels, SH flux is reduced because of reduced LW cooling implying reduced buoyancy flux Total Turb Rad

© Crown copyright Met Office What if? …the initial s12 cloud layer were deeper? Same initial response (larger w e higher cloud-top and thinner cloud layer)? Noting that cloud depth has a strong control on the integrated buoyancy flux, thinner cloud layer still implies w e reduces but not now to less than control? So equilibrium state would still be a thinner cloud layer (ie positive feedback) but with a higher cloud-top? Chris Jones has tested this in a MLM…

© Crown copyright Met Office Initial conditions dont matter!

© Crown copyright Met Office What if? What if the circulation changes? Eg, the shape of the w pdf changes? HadGEM2 shows no change in the mean but less ascent and more weak subsidence If w>0 associated with small cloud fraction then this might suggest a negative cloud feedback (but this doesnt happen in HadGEM2) Something to try in time-varying CGILS… Eg, the wind speed changes? (See Webb and Lock, soon!) s12