Biomechanical comparison between conventional and rapid expansion of skin Yan-jun Zeng, Chuan-qing Xu, Jian Yang, Guang-ci Sun, Xiao-hu Xu British Journal of Plastic Surgery Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 660-666 (October 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00217-0
Fig. 1 The schematic diagram for measuring tension in vivo. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2003 56, 660-666DOI: (10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00217-0)
Fig. 2 Stress–strain curves: (A) rapid expansion; (B) conventional expansion. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2003 56, 660-666DOI: (10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00217-0)
Fig. 3 Reduced stress relaxation curves: (A) rapid expansion; (B) conventional expansion. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2003 56, 660-666DOI: (10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00217-0)
Fig. 4 Reduced creep curves: (A) rapid expansion; (B) conventional expansion. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2003 56, 660-666DOI: (10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00217-0)