Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D Bound to the Human Receptor HveA
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Rahul C. Deo, Caroline M. Groft, K.R. Rajashankar, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structural Elements of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor–DNA Complex
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 43-54 (January 2001) Crystal Structure and Deletion Analysis Show that the Accessory Subunit of Mammalian DNA Polymerase γ, PolγB, Functions as a Homodimer  José A. Carrodeguas, Karsten Theis, Daniel F. Bogenhagen, Caroline Kisker  Molecular Cell  Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 43-54 (January 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8

Figure 1 Structure of PolγB (A) Secondary structure of PolγB colored by domains, shown together with a sequence alignment of mouse, human, and Xenopus PolγB (accession numbers AF177202, AF177201, and AF124606) and segments of the T. thermophilus glycyl-tRNA synthetase (Logan et al. 1995) that superimpose with the PolγB structure. The sequence identity between ttGRS and human PolγB is 20.2%. Cylinders refer to α helices and arrows to β strands; yellow, green, and red correspond to domains 1, 2, and 3. β strands are labeled with numbers, α helices with letters, and 310 helices are indicated. (B) Overall structure of the PolγB dimer, with one subunit colored by domains as in (A) and the other in gray. Because the crystallographic model is more complete for monomers C and D than A and B, all figures and calculations are based on the C/D dimer. The C-terminal residues present in the recombinant protein are omitted because they do not occur in the native protein and do not change PolγB's properties detectably. Figures 1B, 2, 3B, 3C were prepared with Molscript and Raster3D (Kraulis 1991; Merritt and Murphy 1994). Molecular Cell 2001 7, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8)

Figure 2 Structural Relationship to Type IIa Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases (A) Superposition of PolγB and ttGRS monomers. PolγB is colored by domains as in Figure 1, and ttGRS (PDB code 1ATI) is shown in blue. (B) Superposition of domain 3 of PolγB with the C-terminal domain of threonyl-tRNA synthetase bound to its cognate tRNA (Yaremchuk et al. 2000; PDB code 1QF6). The view is from the top of PolγB (oriented as in Figure 1B) along the helical axis of the tRNA anticodon stem loop. The synthetase is shown as a ribbon in cyan, and the sugar phosphate backbone of the tRNA as a thick blue line with the anticodon nucleotides as thin blue lines. Domain 3 of PolγB is shown in red with labeled helices J, K, and M; domain 2 of the other monomer is shown in gray, with labeled helices F and H. (C) Adenylation active site of ttGRS (PDB code 1B76) with bound ATP (right) and the corresponding pocket in domain 2 of PolγB (left). Critical residues for ATP binding in ttGRS and the corresponding residues in PolγB are shown in all-bonds representation. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8)

Figure 3 Interface of the PolγB Homodimer (A) Dimer interface of PolγB. Left, oriented as in Figure 1B; right, rotated by 120° around the y axis to show the interface in domain 2. Red, atoms that become solvent inaccessible upon dimer formation; yellow, atoms whose accessibility decreases upon dimer formation; blue, waters that are in van der Waals distance to both monomers in the dimer; green, metal bound to main chain carbonyls at the dimer interface. Figure 3A and Figure 5 were prepared with Grasp (Nicholls et al. 1991). (B) 2Fo − Fc electron density map of the metal binding site. The octahedral coordination sphere of the metal is indicated with dotted lines. (C) Comparison of the dimerization domain of CheA (blue and red subunits, PDB code 1B3Q) with domain 2 of PolγB (green and gray monomers). Helices are shown as cylinders and strands in ball-and-stick with hydrogen bonds as dotted lines. N and C termini are indicated. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8)

Figure 5 Surface Features of PolγB (A) Conserved residues in PolγB from human, mouse, and Xenopus laevis. Residues of mouse PolγB strictly conserved in human and at least type-conserved in Xenopus are colored green (noncarbon atoms) or yellow (carbon atoms). Residues of mouse PolγB deleted in Xenopus PolγB are colored in magenta. (B) Surface potential of the PolγB dimer calculated at neutral pH, ionic strength 100 mM, contoured at ± 10 kT (blue, positive; red, negative). The surface potential of human PolγB (homology model, not shown) is similar. Top, front view as in Figure 1B; bottom, view of the C-terminal regions of PolγB. The arrows indicate the pocket in domain 1. Molecular Cell 2001 7, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8)

Figure 4 Deletion Analysis of PolγB (A) Location of characterized deletions (N1, C1, I2, and I3 [Carrodeguas and Bogenhagen 2000], I4-I7 [this work]) in the structure of PolγB. Deletions are shown in black with overlapping regions in gray. The residues deleted in I5 (and also in I2) are disordered in the crystal and are shown in an arbitrary conformation as a dashed line. (B) Sedimentation analysis of PolγB. Four hundred nanograms of each wild-type recombinant PolγB (B, 53.6 kDa) and the I4 mutant (50 kDa) were separated by sedimentation in a 10%–30% glycerol gradient together with protein standards. Fractions (3–16 shown) were collected from the bottom of the gradient and analyzed by Western blotting. The sedimentation positions of protein standards are indicated according to their sedimentation coefficients. (C) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay of protein–DNA complexes. Left, complexes formed between PolγA alone or together with wild-type PolγB or PolγB derivatives. Right, relative mobilities of several protein–DNA complexes. T4 DNA polymerase (103.6 kDa monomer with a calculated net charge similar to that of PolγA (−8 versus −11)) is included as a mobility marker. A, PolγA; B, wild-type PolγB; I3–I7, deletion mutants; C, PolγB-CBD fusion protein; T4, T4 DNA polymerase. Arrows on the right point to supershifted complexes containing PolγB monomers (1) or homodimers (2). Reactions were carried out in 10 μl aliquots containing 4 nM of a 26-mer:45-mer primer:template DNA, 4 nM PolγA and wild-type PolγB, 8 nM T4 DNA polymerase, 8 nM PolγB deletion mutants and 40 nM mutant I3, respectively. Note that equimolar amounts of PolγA and wild-type PolγB in the left panel are able to supershift only part of the PolγA:DNA complex. A 2-fold excess of wild-type PolγB over PolγA (not shown) supershifts the complex in a way similar to mutants I5–I7. (D) Stimulation of PolγA activity by PolγB derivatives on poly(dA):oligo(dT). Labels are as in (C). Molecular Cell 2001 7, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8)

Figure 6 Binding of PolγB to ssDNA Studied by Gel Electrophoresis Wild-type PolγB and several deletion mutants were tested for their ability to bind to a 129 nt ssDNA fragment derived from the human mtDNA light strand origin of replication (OL). The presence of two complexes with different mobilities might be due to multiple binding sites on the 129-mer or to complexes of fixed stoichiometry with distinct conformations. Reactions were carried out in 10 μl containing 0.5 nM DNA and 4, 12, or 40 nM protein (triangles). Molecular Cell 2001 7, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00153-8)