Development and Validation of a Computational Method for Assessment of Missense Variants in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy  Daniel M. Jordan, Adam Kiezun,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differential Relationship of DNA Replication Timing to Different Forms of Human Mutation and Variation Amnon Koren, Paz Polak, James Nemesh, Jacob J. Michaelson,
Advertisements

Fragile X and X-Linked Intellectual Disability: Four Decades of Discovery Herbert A. Lubs, Roger E. Stevenson, Charles E. Schwartz The American Journal.
Box and Whisker Plots Example: Comparing two samples.
From: Perioperative Use of Dobutamine in Cardiac Surgery and Adverse Cardiac Outcome:Propensity-adjusted Analyses Anesthes. 2008;108(6): doi: /ALN.0b013e f.
A Haplotype at STAT2 Introgressed from Neanderthals and Serves as a Candidate of Positive Selection in Papua New Guinea  Fernando L. Mendez, Joseph C.
A Strategy to Find Suitable Reference Genes for miRNA Quantitative PCR Analysis and Its Application to Cervical Specimens  Iris Babion, Barbara C. Snoek,
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
DOMINO: Using Machine Learning to Predict Genes Associated with Dominant Disorders  Mathieu Quinodoz, Beryl Royer-Bertrand, Katarina Cisarova, Silvio.
Marc A. Coram, Huaying Fang, Sophie I. Candille, Themistocles L
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium  Laura M.
K. Alaine Broadaway, David J. Cutler, Richard Duncan, Jacob L
Pathogenic Variants for Mendelian and Complex Traits in Exomes of 6,517 European and African Americans: Implications for the Return of Incidental Results 
Genomic DNA Methylation Signatures Enable Concurrent Diagnosis and Clinical Genetic Variant Classification in Neurodevelopmental Syndromes  Erfan Aref-Eshghi,
Joint-Position Sense and Kinesthesia in Cerebral Palsy
Common Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Act in Concert to Affect Plasma Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol  Victor Spirin, Steffen Schmidt,
Design and Multiseries Validation of a Web-Based Gene Expression Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival  Ryan K. Van Laar 
Arjun Pennathur, MD, Liqiang Xi, MD, Virginia R. Litle, MD, William E
Evaluation of ACMG-Guideline-Based Variant Classification of Cancer Susceptibility and Non-Cancer-Associated Genes in Families Affected by Breast Cancer 
Comparative assessment of five serum antimüllerian hormone assays for the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome  Pascal Pigny, Ph.D., Elisse Gorisse,
Linkage Thresholds for Two-stage Genome Scans
Pejman Mohammadi, Niko Beerenwinkel, Yaakov Benenson  Cell Systems 
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Metabolic Network Prediction of Drug Side Effects
Box-And-Whisker Plots
Comprehensive Diagnostic Testing for Stereocilin
Improved Heritability Estimation from Genome-wide SNPs
Arpita Ghosh, Fei Zou, Fred A. Wright 
Assessment of the Clinical Relevance of BRCA2 Missense Variants by Functional and Computational Approaches  Lucia Guidugli, Hermela Shimelis, David L.
First series of minimally invasive, robot-assisted tracheobronchoplasty with mesh for severe tracheobronchomalacia  Richard Lazzaro, MD, Byron Patton,
Transethnic Genetic-Correlation Estimates from Summary Statistics
Integrative Multi-omic Analysis of Human Platelet eQTLs Reveals Alternative Start Site in Mitofusin 2  Lukas M. Simon, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein,
Percentage of Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Hepatocytes Is a Better Predictor of Response Than Serum Viremia Levels  Elena Rodríguez-Iñigo, Juan Manuel López-Alcorocho,
Previous Estimates of Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Level Variance Did Not Account for Sampling Error: Comparing the mtDNA Genetic Bottleneck in Mice and.
Challenges in analysis and interpretation of cost data in vascular surgery  Kevin Mani, MD, Jonas Lundkvist, RPh, PhD, Lars Holmberg, MD, PhD, Anders Wanhainen,
Prediction of persistent post-surgery pain by preoperative cold pain sensitivity: biomarker development with machine-learning-derived analysis  J. Lötsch,
Loci Related to Metabolic-Syndrome Pathways Including LEPR,HNF1A, IL6R, and GCKR Associate with Plasma C-Reactive Protein: The Women's Genome Health Study 
Evaluating the Clinical Validity of Gene-Disease Associations: An Evidence-Based Framework Developed by the Clinical Genome Resource  Natasha T. Strande,
Alkes L. Price, Gregory V. Kryukov, Paul I. W. de Bakker, Shaun M
Mamoru Kato, Yusuke Nakamura, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda 
A Variant Detection Pipeline for Inherited Cardiomyopathy–Associated Genes Using Next-Generation Sequencing  Théo G.M. Oliveira, Miguel Mitne-Neto, Louise.
Gail P. Jarvik, Brian L. Browning 
Genotype Imputation with Millions of Reference Samples
A Clinically Validated Diagnostic Second-Generation Sequencing Assay for Detection of Hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations  Ian E. Bosdet, T. Roderick.
Matthew D. Wilkerson, Jason M. Schallheim, D. Neil Hayes, Patrick J
Hugues Aschard, Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson, Amit D. Joshi, Alkes L
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (November 2018)
Dan-Yu Lin, Zheng-Zheng Tang  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Evaluation of Second-Generation Sequencing of 19 Dilated Cardiomyopathy Genes for Clinical Applications  Sivakumar Gowrisankar, Jordan P. Lerner-Ellis,
Erratum The American Journal of Human Genetics
Quan Li, Kai Wang  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Box-And-Whisker Plots
Inherited Cardiomyopathies
Box and Whisker Plots.
Variant Interpretation: Functional Assays to the Rescue
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium  Laura M.
Pei-Lung Chen, Dimitrios Avramopoulos, Virginia K. Lasseter, John A
Naisha Shah, Ying-Chen Claire Hou, Hung-Chun Yu, Rachana Sainger, C
Functional Assays Are Essential for Interpretation of Missense Variants Associated with Variable Expressivity  Karen S. Raraigh, Sangwoo T. Han, Emily.
A Rigorous Interlaboratory Examination of the Need to Confirm Next-Generation Sequencing–Detected Variants with an Orthogonal Method in Clinical Genetic.
Find the Mean of the following numbers.
L-GATOR: Genetic Association Testing for a Longitudinally Measured Quantitative Trait in Samples with Related Individuals  Xiaowei Wu, Mary Sara McPeek 
Classification of Human Chromosome 21 Gene-Expression Variations in Down Syndrome: Impact on Disease Phenotypes  E. Aït Yahya-Graison, J. Aubert, L. Dauphinot,
Long Runs of Homozygosity Are Enriched for Deleterious Variation
Leslie S. Emery, Kevin M. Magnaye, Abigail W. Bigham, Joshua M
Genomic DNA Methylation Signatures Enable Concurrent Diagnosis and Clinical Genetic Variant Classification in Neurodevelopmental Syndromes  Erfan Aref-Eshghi,
The HTT CAG-Expansion Mutation Determines Age at Death but Not Disease Duration in Huntington Disease  Jae Whan Keum, Aram Shin, Tammy Gillis, Jayalakshmi Srinidhi.
Quanhe Yang, W. Dana Flanders, Ramal Moonesinghe, John P. A
Analytical Validation of a Highly Sensitive, Multiplexed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Monitoring System Targeting BCR-ABL1 RNA  Justin T. Brown, Ion J. Beldorth,
A Haplotype at STAT2 Introgressed from Neanderthals and Serves as a Candidate of Positive Selection in Papua New Guinea  Fernando L. Mendez, Joseph C.
Zuoheng Wang, Mary Sara McPeek  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Presentation transcript:

Development and Validation of a Computational Method for Assessment of Missense Variants in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy  Daniel M. Jordan, Adam Kiezun, Samantha M. Baxter, Vineeta Agarwala, Robert C. Green, Michael F. Murray, Trevor Pugh, Matthew S. Lebo, Heidi L. Rehm, Birgit H. Funke, Shamil R. Sunyaev  The American Journal of Human Genetics  Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages 183-192 (February 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011 Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Process Used to Classify Variants at the LMM This process is described in detail in Material and Methods. We treat the pathogenic, benign, and likely benign categories as high-confidence classifications for the purposes of training the automatic classifier. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2011 88, 183-192DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011) Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Distribution of Variant Pathogenicity We categorized 350 missense variants in six genes according to the criteria described in Figure 1. The three categories pathogenic, benign, and likely benign were treated as high-confidence classifications and used as training data for our classifier (enumerated in Table S1). The American Journal of Human Genetics 2011 88, 183-192DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011) Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Automated Prediction Process For each variant, we computed four features and combined them by a machine-learning classifier. We trained this classifier on the high-confidence variants classified with clinical data and validated the classifier against the same data using 10-fold cross validation. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2011 88, 183-192DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011) Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Results of Cross Validation Rows contain median 10-fold cross-validation results for the gold standard data set at different levels of coverage. Horizontal bars correspond to different levels of coverage and median validation coverage and accuracy levels are indicated. “True Positives” are variants that were manually classified as pathogenic and that our method predicted as pathogenic. “True Negatives” are variants that were manually classified as benign or likely benign and that our method predicted as benign. “False Positives” are variants that were manually classified as benign” or likely benign but that our method predicted as pathogenic. “False Negatives” are variants that were manually classified as pathogenic but that our method predicted as benign. “Uncovered” are variants without a prediction (no call). The bottom-most coverage level, indicated in red, was used for our final predictor. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2011 88, 183-192DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011) Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Feature Selection Experiment Each column shows the distribution of accuracies in 1000 runs of cross validation for a classifier built with a different set of features: “all features” represents the final four-feature classifier with manual alignments, “broken alignments” represents the four-feature classifier without automatic alignments, and each of the other four columns represents a three-feature classifier missing the specified feature. Box plots show lower and upper quartiles (50% confidence intervals), and whiskers show 1.5 IQR ranges. The addition of each feature appears to improve the classifier, which is confirmed by a permutation test. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2011 88, 183-192DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011) Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Results for Low-Confidence Data Set Columns indicate, for each class of variants, the number of predictions in predicted categories produced by the final classifier. The American Journal of Human Genetics 2011 88, 183-192DOI: (10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.01.011) Copyright © 2011 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions