A comparative study of two extraction methods routinely used for DNA recovery from simulated post coital samples T. Mudariki, H. Pallikarana-Tirumala, L. Ives, S. Hadi, W. Goodwin Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages e194-e195 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.100 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Comparison of DNA concentrations from samples extracted using Differex™ and QIAamp® measured using Nanodrop 2000. Very similar results were obtained when using Quantifiler®. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2013 4, e194-e195DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.100) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Percentage of profiles falling into different classifications. Samples extracted with QIAamp® and Differex™ and profiled using AmpFℓSTR® SGM Plus® and PowerPlex® ESI 17. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2013 4, e194-e195DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.100) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions