Current State of the Lattice Studies for the XFEL Injector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
Advertisements

Injector Optimization for Simultaneous Operation with Different Bunch Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting
Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics for Diagnostic Section BC1 in the European XFEL.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
RF Tweak 5 Tool for FLASH and XFEL
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.
UKNF OsC RAL – 21 & 22 June 2010 UKNF achievements & milestones J. Pozimski.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Review of the European XFEL Bunch Compression System Summary Torsten Limberg.
~ gun3.9 GHz cavity Bunch compressor 3 ILC cryomodules 45 deg. spectro injector main linac user area disp. area transport line Overview of.
LOLA setup simulated LOLA measurement*: no transverse beam dimensions imaging: entrance-LOLA to OTR simulated LOLA measurement*: gaussian transverse shape.
XFEL BC Review Meeting, 18/12/2006, Christopher Gerth Christopher Gerth, Michael Röhrs, Holger Schlarb DESY Hamburg Optics Layout of the Diagnostic Sections.
Yauhen Kot Current Status of XFEL Simulations.
LCLS Accelerator SLAC linac tunnel research yard Linac-0 L =6 m Linac-1 L  9 m  rf   25° Linac-2 L  330 m  rf   41° Linac-3 L  550 m  rf  0°
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
N.Solyak, RTMLALCPG 2009,Albuquerque, Oct.2 1 ILC RTML Upgrade in SB2009 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
T. Limberg Position of the 3rd Harmonic System. Injector (with first Bunch Compression Stage) 2 European XFEL MAC May 2010 T. Limberg.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
Status of RTML design in TDR configuration A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Post-LH Diagnostic Line for LCLS-II P. Emma, M. Woodley, Y. Nosochkov, Feb. 26, 2014 Steal beam at Hz with y -kicker after LH (  y = 15 mm) Bend.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Beam collimation in the transfer line from 8 GeV linac to the Main Injector A. Drozhdin The beam transfer line from 8 GeV Linac to the Main Injector is.
Status of the Simulations on Photo Injector Optimization for Low Charges Yauhen Kot BD Meeting,
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Beam Optics of the TTF2 Nina Golubeva DESY. Beam optics from the BC2 up to the undulators General introduction to linear optics: – constraints for different.
1 RTML Emittance Measurement Station Yuri Kubyshin (1), Robert Apsimon (2), Hector García (1,2) (1) Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) (2) CERN CLIC.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
Analysis of Garren’s 27-Jul-2011 Hybrid Synchrotron Lattice J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting February 2,
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
LCLS2sc MAD files: Injector to Bypass Line
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
Damping Rings - Homework I
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
Longitudinal Diagnostics for start-up
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Injector Beam Line Optics
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Towards an NMC lattice for PS2
Simulation Calculations
Injector Topics for Discussion
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Studies on orbit corrections
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Diagnostics overview Beam profile monitors Cherenkov radiators Summary
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
XFEL Beam Dynamics Activity at CANDLE
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
S2E Meeting on Yauhen Kot.
Presentation transcript:

Current State of the Lattice Studies for the XFEL Injector Yauhen Kot 03.11.2008

Injector Building & Lattice at Injector Gives place for: - Gun ACC 3.9GHz RF Laser heater Diagnostics section (1.5 76° FODO-cells with 4 OTR) TDS Spare place of about 3m for the dump exchange 6.5m long shielding 20m long Dogleg for the vertical Displacement of the beam (2.75m)

Optics at the XFEL Injector Diagnostics Dogleg Optics is fixed after that point Laser Heater Shielding

Optics after the Injector BC0, Phase Shifter & Matching to Linac Phase shifter is set initialy as two FODO cells. Slightly deformations from the Ideal periodic solution lead to phase shift.

Phase Shifter Dmx=0.0p Dmx=-0.2p Dmx=0.2p Dmx=0.4p Dmx=-0.4p It becomes possible to change the phase advance by approximately p without significant aberrations by means of the phase shifter Dmx=-0.6p Dmx=0.6p

Optics up to Linac Whole lattice requires 48 quadrupoles! (without countering cold ones)

Chromatic Features of the whole Section (from Laser Heater to Linac) (first rough estimations) Worst imaginable energy distribution! red, green – horizontal and vertical planes accordingly after running through the section 10000 particles with average norm. emittance of 0.96mu have been simulated Energy spread 2%  ex = 1.04mu, ey = 1.17mu, i.e. increase by 8.3% and 22% accordingly Energy spread 5%  ex = 1.21mu, ey = 1.66mu, i.e. increase by 26% and 73% accordingly

Chromatic Features: Laser Heater to Dogleg red, green – horizontal and vertical planes accordingly after running through the section 10000 particles with average norm. emittance of 0.96mu have been simulated Energy spread 2%  ex = 0.97mu, ey = 1.11mu, i.e. increase by 1.0% and 16% accordingly Energy spread 5%  ex = 1.07mu, ey = 2.01mu (?), i.e. increase by 11% and 109% accordingly  This part is the main source of the emittance blow up due to chromatic effects!

Chromatic Features: Dogleg red, green – horizontal and vertical planes accordingly after running through the section 10000 particles with average norm. emittance of 0.96mu have been simulated Energy spread 2%  ex = 0.96mu, ey = 0.96mu, i.e. increase by 0.0% and 0.0% accordingly Energy spread 5%  ex = 0.96mu, ey = 0.97mu, i.e. increase by 0.0% and 1.0% accordingly

Chromatic Features: from Dogleg to Linac red, green – horizontal and vertical planes accordingly after running through the section 10000 particles with average norm. emittance of 0.96mu have been simulated Energy spread 2%  ex = 1.00mu, ey = 0.97mu, i.e. increase by 4.2% and 1.0% accordingly Energy spread 5%  ex = 1.21mu, ey = 1.09mu, i.e. increase by 26% and 13.5% accordingly

Summary It is possible to house all desired components in the XFEL injector (like laser heater, OTR monitors, TDS) with reasonable optics functions. 48 warm quadrupoles are needed in that case Chromatic properties could become a problem. Hereby is the section downstream the dogleg the main source of the problems. Discussion about the expected energy spread of the beam needed. Chromatic properties were investigated under the assumption of the worst imaginable energy distribution (all energies have the same probability).More authentic simulations with more realistic energy distribution (gaussian) are ongoing.