What is Open Peer Review?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Authorship APS Professional Skills Course:

Advertisements

Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.

Repositories, Learned Societies and Research Funders Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Work Flows of the Online Review System Copernicus Office Editor Copernicus Publications | April 2014.

Schools partnerships in Europe through the Internet

How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.

Towards an Integrated Transparent Journal Publishing Workflow

CREATING THE ENTERPRISE SOCIAL MEDIA GAME PLAN September 2013.

Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.

Implementing DOIs for Data DataPool supporting institutional service development Simon Coles, Andrew Milsted, Wendy White Jisc Managing Research Data Programme.

EMI INFSO-RI SA2 - Quality Assurance Alberto Aimar (CERN) SA2 Leader EMI First EC Review 22 June 2011, Brussels.

IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,

Acknowledgements and Conflicts of interest Dr Gurpreet Kaur Associate Professor Dept of Pharmacology Government Medical College Amritsar.

Summary of Local Seminars & Focus Groups 20/06/ Athens WP8 – TESTING II coordinated by IFI.

“Electrical engineers vocational education transparency - ELEVET” „Przejrzystość kształcenia zawodowego inżynierów elektryków”

How to write a manuscript and get it published in European Urology Common problems and potential solutions Giacomo Novara, M.D., F.E.B.U. Assistant professor.

Bahar Mehmani 3 September 2015 Reviewer Recognition Program Elsevier and Innovations in Peer Review.

LAWRENCE P. KANE, PH.D. DEPT OF IMMUNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PUBLISHING IN THE 21 ST CENTURY.

Ethics and Scientific Writing. Ethical Considerations Ethics more important than legal considerations Your name and integrity are all that you have!

F1000: HELPING YOU WRITE, DISCOVER AND SHARE SCIENCE [Your name] [date and location of talk]

S 1 Annual Meeting 2013 Crediting EC contribution Open access requirements Chiara Bearzotti NACLIM project manager.

1 | Communications and Outreacheere.energy.gov EERE Web Coordinators Monthly Meeting Hosted by Drew Bittner November 17, 2011 Phone: 1 (470) Access.

SciencePAD Open Software for Open Science Alberto Di Meglio – CERN.

Publication Ethics Webinar: Jan 2016 (Ethical) framework for author-driven publishing Dr Michaela Torkar Editorial Director, F1000Research

OPEN SCIENCE PUBLISHING: BEYOND OPEN ACCESS MAX PLANCK OPEN ACCESS AMBASSADORS CONFERENCE, 4 December 2014 Michaela Torkar Editorial Director, F1000 Research.

Dr Karen Smith Educational Development Unit. We will (briefly) cover:  the mechanics of getting published in journals  how to choose the right journal.

Research Methods, 9th Edition Theresa L. White and Donald H. McBurney Chapter 4 Writing in Psychology.

ScienceOpen: Scientific Publishing for “Generation Open” Open Access Ambassadors Conference, December, Munich Dr. Stephanie Dawson, CEO.

EWIL European Women Interactive Learning With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme of the European Union. This project has been funded with support.

TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.

Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success

Work Flows of the Online Review System Copernicus Office Editor

NRF Open Access Statement

OpenAIRE in 8 Minutes Tony Ross-Hellauer State and University Library,

Clinicaltrials.gov Update

Open peer review as educational resource for science PhD students

NOAA Data Management Perspective & Plans NSF RDMI Workshop

Open Access & PURE Research Bite 2016

Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF

Are you making the most of Open Access?

PROPOSALS ON ETCS COMPATIBILITY TESTING & RE-AUTHORIZATION

Introduction to f1000Research

Peer Editing Research.

Rebecca Lawrence Managing Director, F February 2018

Role of peer review in journal evaluation

Open researcher and contributor ID

Results from surveys on peer review & peer feedback

Rhodes Digital Commons: Raising the visibility of your research Research Week. 12th May 2017 Khawulile Radebe: Librarian: Repository & Metadata Debbie.

NIH Public Access Policy

Fundraising Bright Spots

ASAPbio/HHMI/Wellcome peer review meeting 8 Feb 2018

Open Peer Review: a way towards a more transparent scholarly publishing system Edit Görögh University of Göttingen Hungarian National Workshop on Open.

Copernicus Publications

Helene Brinken Bootcamp – Day 1

Course MT08 Perspectives on peer review

9. Quality and Experimental data

EESC public hearing 4 June Brussels

INTRODUCTION AND SPECIFIC NEEDS

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.

Immediate Publication

Tax Policies in the EU: 2018 Survey Platform for Tax Good Governance

How to make the most of your publications in the humanities?

Updated NIH Public Access Policy

UNEP / Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA)

FOSTER & OpenAIRE training and learning resources on Open Science and RDM Iryna Kuchma, EIFL Open Science and Research Data Management Train-the-Trainer.

Primary Helpers.

Preprints and literature provenance in Europe PMC

Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.

GENERATING ISSUE-ORIENTED STATISTICS AND INDICATORS

Preprints and literature provenance in Europe PMC

Presentation transcript:

What is Open Peer Review? @tonyR_H What is Open Peer Review? Tony Ross-Hellauer Peer Review Transparency Workshop MIT Media Lab, 23rd Jan 2018

Q. What is open peer review? A. It’s complicated

“Open Peer Review” encompasses diverse constellations of many distinct aspects ** 122 definitions collected and analysed ** ** 22 distinct configurations of 7 traits identified ** Open identities Open reports Open participation Open interaction Open pre-review manuscripts Open final-version commenting Open platforms Primary aspects Secondary aspects Image CC BY AC McCann, w/ amendment (by me) See: Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)

Distribution of OPR traits amongst definitions Figure 7. Unique configurations of OPR traits within definitions. How to cite: Ross-Hellauer T 2017 What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations] F1000Research 2017, 6:588 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2) Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)

22 unique configurations of OPR traits Figure 7. Unique configurations of OPR traits within definitions. How to cite: Ross-Hellauer T 2017 What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; referees: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations] F1000Research 2017, 6:588 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2) Ross-Hellauer, 2017, "What is open peer review? A systematic review", F1000Research (DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11369.2)

Attitudes to open peer review OPR is already mainstream 76.2% have practical experience 60% believe OPR should be common practice Positive reactions to most OPR traits (esp. open interaction, reports, participation) However, strong rejection of open identities (47.7% against) Ross-Hellauer T, Deppe A, Schmidt B (2017) Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers. PLoS ONE 12(12): e0189311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189311

Next steps More transparency – being clear on peer review policies and implications for reviewers and authors More education – what OPR is, how to review responsibly More research – what works, in which circumstances (esp. re. open identities) Make reviews count more – make them citable, discoverable, and creditable

Thanks! Email: tross@know-center.at Twitter: @tonyR_H This work was funded by the European Commission H2020 project OpenAIRE2020 (Grant agreement: 643410, Call: H2020-EINFRA-2014-1).