Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2015 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March.
Advertisements

Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
A Royal College of Radiologists National Audit of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression and Implications for the Development.
Incorporating big data into treatment plan evaluation: Development of statistical DVH metrics and visualization dashboards  Charles S. Mayo, PhD, John.
Lactate-Base 1H Magnetic Spectroscopy Does Not Predict Response and Outcomes in Patients With Stage IV Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma  Q. Le, A.
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
Morten Hoyer, Ph. D. , Henrik Roed, D. M. Sc
Beyond geometrical overlap: a Dosimetrical Evaluation of automated volumes Adaptation (DEA) in head and neck replanning  Gian Carlo Mattiucci, Luca Boldrini,
Mature results from a Swedish comparison study of conventional versus accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma – The ARTSCAN.
Linear epitope mapping of peanut allergens demonstrates individualized and persistent antibody-binding patterns  Christian S. Hansen, PhD, Martin Dufva,
Volume 64, Pages e1-e3 (January 2017)
Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology
Chewing gum for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a pilot randomized controlled trial  J.N. Darvall, M Handscombe, K Leslie  British.
Local control and overall survival after frameless radiosurgery: A single center experience  Angelika Bilger, Florian Frenzel, Oliver Oehlke, Rolf Wiehle,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans  Christian Rønn Hansen, Anders Bertelsen, Irene Hazell,
The efficacy of 12 weeks non-surgical treatment for patients not eligible for total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up 
Linear epitope mapping of peanut allergens demonstrates individualized and persistent antibody-binding patterns  Christian S. Hansen, PhD, Martin Dufva,
Pain in cancer survivors; filling in the gaps
R. Cantón  Clinical Microbiology and Infection 
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Routine histological examination of the mastectomy scar at the time of breast reconstruction: important oncological surveillance?  M.G Soldin, M Grob,
Salvage Lung Resection After Definitive Radiation (>59 Gy) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes  Julie E. Bauman, MD, Michael.
Patient-reported symptoms and performance status before palliative radiotherapy in geriatric cancer patients (octogenarians)  Carsten Nieder, Thomas A.
Satisfaction with Care Among Men with Localised Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Population-based Study  Oskar Bergengren, Hans Garmo, Ola Bratt, Lars Holmberg,
Predictors of acute throat or esophageal patient reported pain during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer  Hiram A. Gay, Jung Hun Oh, Aditya P.
A simple technique for an accurate shielding of the lungs during total body irradiation  Hana Mekdash, Bilal Shahine, Wassim Jalbout, Chirine Chehab, Helena.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Improving CT quality with optimized image parameters for radiation treatment planning and delivery guidance  Guang-Pei Chen, George Noid, An Tai, Feng.
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of thoracic epidural or patient-controlled opiate analgesia on perioperative quality of life  M. Ali, D.C. Winter,
Prospective analysis of in vivo landmark point-based MRI geometric distortion in head and neck cancer patients scanned in immobilized radiation treatment.
Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy  Victor Hernandez, Jordi Saez, Marlies Pasler,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Long-term azitromycin treatment of cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection; an observational cohort study  Christine Rønne.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Breast cancer patients report reduced sensitivity and pain using a barrier film during radiotherapy – A Danish intra-patient randomized multicentre study 
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy  Nicholas J. Lowther, David A.
Two years’ experience with inspiration breath-hold in liver SBRT
Follow up results of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET on CT- based radiotherapy treatment planning for oesophageal cancer  Sweet Ping.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Risk of asthma in heterozygous carriers for cystic fibrosis: A meta-analysis  Anne Orholm Nielsen, Sadaf Qayum, Pierre Nourdine Bouchelouche, Lars Christian.
Evaluating the prevalence and predictive factors of vasomotor and psychological symptoms in prostate cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy: Results.
A dose based approach for evaluation of inter-observer variations in target delineation  Ingrid Kristensen, Kristina Nilsson, Måns Agrup, Karin Belfrage,
Concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of anal cancer: A retrospective review from a large academic center 
Impact of waiting time on nodal staging in head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma treated with radical intensity modulated radiotherapy  Cédric Chevalier,
Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy  A. van.
Lise L. Kjaergard, Sarah L. Frederiksen, Christian Gluud 
Implementation of hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy in the United States: A National Cancer Database analysis  William A. Stokes, MD, Brian.
Appropriateness of Surgical Approach in Black Patients with Lung Cancer—15 Years Later, Little Has Changed  Emanuela Taioli, MD, PhD, Raja Flores, MD 
Callistus M. Nguyen, Alan H. Baydush, James D
Β-Blocker Therapy and Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease – A Danish Nationwide Study of 1·3 Million Individuals  Anne Orholm Nielsen, Lars.
Routine screening for pain combined with a pain treatment protocol in head and neck cancer: a randomised controlled trial  J.E. Williams, J. Peacock,
Pain Response Rates After Conventional Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases in Prospective Nonrandomized Studies: A Systematic Review  Tetsuo Saito,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Chewing gum for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a pilot randomized controlled trial  J.N. Darvall, M Handscombe, K Leslie  British.
Aisling Krishnan, Yat Man Tsang, Adéle Stewart-Lord 
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Physical Function in Patients with Cancer
Observed high incidence of prostatic calculi with the potential to act as natural fiducials for prostate image guided radiotherapy  A.G.M. O'Neill, S.O.
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Influence of head and neck position on ventilation using the air-Q® SP airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients: a prospective randomized crossover.
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Michael Yan, Weidong Kong, Andrew Kerr, Michael Brundage 
Presentation transcript:

Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology Awareness and surveillance of radiation treatment schedules reduces head and neck overall treatment time  Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen, Janne Gornitzka, Pia Andersen, Morten Nielsen, Lars Johnsen, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Ruta Zukauskaite, Jørgen Johansen, Christian Rønn Hansen  Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology   Volume 9, Pages 26-30 (March 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.01.002 Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Average overall treatment time. Mean OTT of accelerated and conventional fractionated treatments per year. Whiskers indicate standard errors. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2019 9, 26-30DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.01.002) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Fraction of protocol deviations. Fraction of patients for whom OTT violated national guidelines per year. Whiskers indicate 68% confidence interval, corresponding to 1 standard deviation. Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology  2019 9, 26-30DOI: (10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.01.002) Copyright © 2019 The Authors Terms and Conditions