FOLLOW-UP FOR THE TCDQ & TCDS & TDI concerning the RF fingers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C h e m i c a l F o r m u l a s B i n a r y C o m p o u n d s.
Advertisements

Impedance of new ALICE beam pipe Benoit Salvant, Rainer Wanzenberg and Olga Zagorodnova Acknowledgments: Elias Metral, Nicolas Mounet, Mark Gallilee, Arturo.
Outcome of yesterday’s brainstorming on the potential of using CALIFES or CTF3 electron beam for impedance studies Elias Métral, Benoit Salvant, Carlo.
RF contact non conformities in LHC interconnects: Impedance aspects N. Mounet, B. Salvant With the help of: Gianluigi Arduini, Vincent Baglin, Serge Claudet,
TDI longitudinal impedance simulation with CST PS A.Grudiev 20/03/2012.
Impedance aspects of Crab cavities R. Calaga, N. Mounet, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova Many thanks to F. Galleazzi, E. Metral, A. Mc Pherson, C. Zannini.
2012 activities of the ICE impedance working group and plans for
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Acknowledgements F. Caspers, H. Damerau, M. Hourican, S.Gilardoni, M. Giovannozzi, E. Métral, M. Migliorati, B. Salvant Dummy septum impedance measurements.
LSWG day: Impedance and beam induced heating Nicolas Mounet *, Daria Atapovych, Nicolò Biancacci, Elias Métral, Tatiana Pieloni, Stefano Redaelli, Benoit.
Status of the SPS impedance model C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: H. Bartosik, O.Berrig, G. Iadarola, E. Métral, N. Mounet, V.G. Vaccaro,
Update on BGV impedance studies Alexej Grudiev, Berengere Luthi, Benoit Salvant for the impedance team Many thanks to Bernd Dehning, Massimiliano Ferro-Luzzi,
SLAC R&D Mtg November 2007LHC Rotatable Phase II CollimatorsSlide # / 17 beam LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation 12 November.
Update on BGV impedance August 1 st 2013 Alexej Grudiev, Berengere Luthi, Benoit Salvant for the impedance team Many thanks to Bernd Dehning, Massimiliano.
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator A.Grudiev.
TDI impedance and power loss O. Aberle, F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, N. Mounet, B. Salvant.
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC Collimation team:R. Assmann, R. Bruce, A. Rossi. Operation team:G.H. Hemelsoet, W. Venturini, V. Kain,
LTEX report at LMC: Status of impedance studies of the LHC forward detectors planned to be upgraded during LS1 (in particular ALFA and TOTEM) Olav Berrig.
Elias Métral, ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany, 18-22/10/ E. Métral TRANSVERSE MODE-COUPLING INSTABILITY IN THE CERN SUPER PROTON SYNCHROTRON G. Arduini,
Elias Métral /1 POWER SPECTRA COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONGITUDINAL BUNCH PROFILES FOR THE LHC BUNCH AT 3.5 TEV Elias Métral Elias Métral.
1 Update on the impedance of the SPS kickers E. Métral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant, C. Zannini SPS impedance meeting - Oct. 16 th 2009 Acknowledgments: F. Caspers,
Update on new triplet beam screen impedance B. Salvant, N. Wang, C. Zannini 7 th December 2015 Acknowledgments: N. Biancacci, R. de Maria, E. Métral, N.
A first glance at the impedance of an SPS collimation system Nicolas Mounet, Benoit Salvant, Carlo Zannini Acknowledgments: collimation team (Daniele,
August 21st 2013 BE-ABP Bérengère Lüthi – Summer Student 2013
Longitudinal impedance of new RF fingers O. Berrig, C. Garion, B. Salvant.
Elias Métral, LHC collimation working group meeting, 17/07/061/26 E. Métral for the RLC team LATEST ESTIMATES OF COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE EFFECTS u Reminder:
Update on the TDI impedance simulations and RF heating for HL- LHC beams Alexej Grudiev on behalf of the impedance team TDI re-design meeting 30/10/2012.
Elias Métral, LIS meeting, 29/01/2008 1/26 GAMMA TRANSITION JUMP FOR PS2 W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral and D. Möhl u Introduction with the case of.
Geometric Impedance of LHC Collimators O. Frasciello, S. Tomassini, M. Zobov LNF-INFN Frascati, Italy With contributions and help of N.Mounet (CERN), A.Grudiev.
F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Métral, B. Salvant
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
Update on HL-LHC triplet fingers
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Update on the impedance of stripline BPMs in the HL-LHC triplet region
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
LHC at 7 TeV/c: comparison phase 1 / IR3MBC
CST simulations of VMTSA
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
Update of the impedance of new LHC experimental beam pipes
LHC INJECTION SEPTUM MSI (1/3)
TCTP the CST side F. Caspers, H. Day, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: R. Assmann, A. Dallocchio, L. Gentini, C. Zannini Impedance Meeting.
News Request to install SLAC collimator in SPS
LHC COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
TCLIA/TCTV transverse impedance simulation
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
Status from the collimator impedance MD in the LHC
Discussion on the TDI impedance specifications
TDIS simulations plan.
NEWS ABOUT COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE
Impedance working group update 21st August 2013
TCLIA/TCTV broad band transverse impedance
STABILITY OF THE LONGITUDINAL BUNCHED-BEAM COHERENT MODES
Simulation of Longitudinal and Transverse Impedance of TCDD (original geometry) Grudiev
Tune shifts in LHC from collimators impedance
Origin of TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance
RESISTIVE HEAT LOAD FOR THE TDI = LHC injection beam stopper
W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, E. Métral, D. Möhl, G. Rumolo and B. Salvant
Elias Métral ( min, 19 slides)
HBP impedance calculations
Power loss in the LHC beam screen at 7 TeV due to the multi-layer longitudinal impedance N. Mounet and E. Métral Goal: Check the effect of the multi-layer.
On rf-finger heating and trapped mode damping in LHC collimator
Collimator design with BPMs (TCTP)
On rf-finger heating and trapped mode damping in LHC collimator
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Impedance working group update 07th August 2013
FOLLOW-UP FOR THE TDI = LHC injection beam stopper
Update of the heating of ALFA detector in 2011
Origin of TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance
Two beam coupling impedance simulations
TCLIA/TCTV transverse BB impedance versus gap size
Presentation transcript:

FOLLOW-UP FOR THE TCDQ & TCDS & TDI concerning the RF fingers A. Grudiev and E. Métral Email sent to Wim Weterings, Brennan Goddard and Volker Mertens (cc Verena Kain, Oliver Aberle, Oliver Bruning, Alexej Grudiev, Jacques Lettry) on 25/09/06 Elias Métral, LCE meeting, 26/09/2006

TCDQ Simulations by Alexej Grudiev => Longitudinal Broad-Band geometrical impedance Z/n = 0.36 mohm (from the 4 tapered transitions) + 0.66 mohm (from the 22 gaps of 1 mm) = 1.02 mohms. This is published in a LHC note. We can trust these values as we believe we simulated the main component of the impedance, i.e. ~ pure geometrical. By putting RF fingers we can eliminate the 0.66 mohm. This was said to be not absolutely necessary for the longitudinal (transverse) impedance, as it is ~1% (2%) of the LHC budget and it was believed to be difficult to install RF fingers. I think at that time the beta function was not taken into account => One should multiply this value by 7 to take it into account, leading to ~ 15% of the total transverse Broad-Band impedance budget. Therefore, and for this reason, I would (have) recommend(ed) to install RF fingers if possible. Elias Métral, LCE meeting, 26/09/2006

TCDS Simulations by Alexej Grudiev => Longitudinal Broad-Band geometrical impedance Z/n = 0.24 mohm (= 4 * 0.06 due to the 4 tapered transitions). The impedance of the 1 mm gaps (22? as for the TCDQ??) is much smaller than for the TCDQ due to the larger half gap (~ 3 times the one of the TCDQ). This is also published in a LHC note. Therefore, we do not push too much to install RF fingers in this case, but of course it is better if you can do something. Elias Métral, LCE meeting, 26/09/2006

TDI Measurements by Fritz Caspers and Tom Kroyer (after some simulations by Alexej) => Z/n = 14 mOhms, and Zy  2 MOhms/m. As it is the measured (total) impedance, it is the sum of the geometrical and resistive parts. Therefore, we don’t know from these measurements the Broad-Band impedance of the 5 mm and 1 mm gaps alone, and therefore we don’t know exactly what will be reduced with the RF fingers. But one can anticipate that the gaps should contribute much more than the 2% computed for the TCDQ => ~ 20%. Furthermore, betax=50 m, i.e. it is slightly smaller than the average value (70 m), and therefore the impedance has to be multiplied by ~0.7. So, for the TDI, we would also (have) recommend(ed) to put RF fingers. Elias Métral, LCE meeting, 26/09/2006

Reminder on the LHC Broad-Band impedance budget Z/n (mOhms) Zt (MOhms/m) - Inj: 70 1.35 - Top: 76 2.67 Elias Métral, LCE meeting, 26/09/2006