NRRA Recycling Economic & Environmental Benefits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Institute for Road Construction and Maintenance - Vienna University of Technology ISTU O PTIMIZED P AVEMENT D ESIGN W ITH R ESPECT TO Q UALITY AND E CONOMY.
Advertisements

Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Comparative Analysis of Emulsion and Hot Asphalt Cement Chip Seal Performance Douglas D. Gransberg, P.E., C.C.E. University of Oklahoma.
Selecting the Right Maintenance Treatment Sponsored by: Minnesota LTAP Center Presented by: Michael Marti, P.E. SRF Consulting Group, Inc. Dan Wegman,
Perpetual Pavements Concept and History Iowa Open House
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Georgia Pavement Management System Development 1997 – 1998: l A quality-based on-site pavement condition evaluation system l A KBS for diagnosing the causes.
Pavement Management Keeping Good Roads Good, Making Poor Roads Better.
A Urban Highway Infrastructure: Design For Long, Long Life Michael I. Darter, Ph.D, PE Principle Engineer, ARA, Inc. Director, Pavement Research Institute,
Presented by Matthew J. LaChance Pavement Solutions for State, County, and Municipal Infrastructures.
Larry Galehouse, PE, PS, Director.  Established on July 11, 2003  Created to promote pavement preservation nationally and provide technical support.
Idaho Transportation Department Karen A. Strauss, P.E. Pavement Management Engineer.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
CE577_Spring 2007 Pavement Management and Rehabilitation Dr. Fouad Bayomy, PE Professor of Civil Engineering
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
PRIORITIZATION.
Thermally Insulated Concrete Pavements: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Methods and Preliminary Results January 10, 2011 John Harvey Nick Santero Lev Khazanovich.
Optimal Highway Durability in Cold Regions Jia Yan Washington State University 18 June 2015.
Pavement Maintenance II
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
AT Benefit Cost Analysis Model Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section Technical Standards Branch Presented by Bill Kenny, Director: Design,
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
NETWORK LEVEL EXAMPLES OF PMS İNŞ.YÜK. MÜH. VEYSEL ARLI.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
Incorporating Pavement Management into the LRTP John Kiefer, P.E. Research Engineer Center For Technology and Training Michigan’s Local Technical Assistance.
Webinar Texas Department of Transportation : Costs Associated with Conversion of Surfaced to Un-Surfaced Roads August 30, 2012.
ODOT. Taking Care of What We Have. Asset Management, Life Cycle Analysis : A Three-Pronged Approach September 9th, 2015 Andrew Williams, Ohio DOT.
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY ENGINEERS Timothy Hens, PE NACE State Director – New York County Engineer, Genesee County, NY.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering October 18-28, 2016.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Design and Rehabilitation Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Pavements H. Thomas Yu Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.
Road Investment Decision Framework
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
ALDOT Specifications Update
A Data-Driven Strategy to Improve the Quality
Optimisation Modelling for Roads through an Outsourced Service
Town Road Improvement Project Plan
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Village of Woodridge 2011 Pavement Analysis
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
2017 Pavement Conference May 24, 2017 Dan Wegman
Manufacturing Capacity Increase via Cycle Time Reduction
Multi-Year Programming and Predictive Modelling
Blatnik Bridge Management Study
Highway Network Health
Pavement condition index calculation
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
Introduction and Applications
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Creating a Bicycle Friendly University
Illinois’ Joint Research Adventure
Optimisation Modelling for Roads through an Outsourced Service
NCAT Pavement Test Track
Importance of Life Cycle Perspective
High Value Research Sweet 16 – RAC Region 3
Research Pays Off Barriers to Implementation of In-Place Recycling
Snow and Ice Removal Route Optimization
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth Bidding Alternate Pavement Designs
WisTMP 2.0 Update Andy Heidtke, PE Statewide Work Zone Design Engineer
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
Presentation transcript:

NRRA Recycling Economic & Environmental Benefits Dan Wegman Braun Intertec May 22nd, 2019

Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT WisDOT Cold In-Place Recycling Pavement Rehabilitation Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT

Benefit of CIR Cost Savings mill/overlay rehabilitation methods. Potential cost savings compared to equivalent mill/overlay rehabilitation methods. Engineering Addresses actual distress rather than symptoms. Cracks eliminated/reduced – CIR act as crack relief layer.

Benefit of CIR Construction Time hours. Environmental Benefit CIR layer can be opened to traffic within a couple of hours. Minimal Traffic disruption and user delay. Environmental Benefit Using in-place materials minimizes hauling cost & use of virgin material. .

CIR Projects Map (Since 2012) Construction Year Project Length (Lane-Mile) 2012 26 2014 24 2015 50 2016 58 Total 158

STH 48 (Grantsburg – Frederic) Performance Data Four years in service Transverse Cracking Longitudinal Cracking CIR Non-CIR CIR Non-CIR Roughness CIR Non-CIR CIR Non-CIR

WisDOT Experience 17% Let savings vs 4” mill & overlay 10x reduction in cracking compared to mill & overlay Minimal disturbance to traveling public

Public Benefits

Public Benefits

Cost per Remaining Service Life Year Added Bituminous Treatments Terry Beaudry MEO 2017 HPMA Cost/Lane Mile RSL Years $/RSL/Year Added CIR $154,251 17 $9,074 Reclaim $237,212 24 $9,884 Medium Mill/OL $160,660 15 $10,711 Thick Mill/OL $211,550 $12,444

RoadResource.org Dan Wegman - Braun Intertec A COMPREHENSIVE RESOURCE FOR OPTIMIZING NETWORK MANAGEMENT Dan Wegman - Braun Intertec

Three Associations Join Together to Support the Industry at Large FORMING THE PAVEMENT PRESERVATION & RECYCLING ALLIANCE The three organizations representing each branch of progressive pavement management join together to support the industry at large. To create a voice that is more powerful, comprehensive, competitive and credible than any single association could be alone Pavement Preservation and Recycling Alliance – for better roads today and stronger networks tomorrow. RoadResource.org 18

Which treatment is best for my road? Input pavement criteria or select photos for treatment options Most road managers just want to know one thing: Which treatment should I use on my pavement? This tool takes in information about your pavement and identifies possible solutions, using pavement condition, primary distress, road type and surface type, or comparing photos of other similar roads. Note: This tool is NOT meant to be a diagnosis for your pavement, but to educate and demonstrate capabilities by treatment. Users are directed to “ask an expert” with these pages. 19 RoadResource.org

Compare Treatments Project Cost & Environmental Benefits NOTE ON COST: Every calculator gives users the ability to use average life extension numbers and cost data from an internationally aggregated cost survey (US & CA) or input their own costs and life extension relevant to their region. Cost & Green Calculator A treatment-level calculator that allows users to compare economic and environmental impact of one treatment over another. Note: Across the site, data is auto-populated with figures and data from international cost survey and average life extension– We’ve also given users the ability to enter their own figures– making the information more relevant to your region/experience. 20 RoadResource.org

Life Cycle Cost Calculator Save big over the life of your pavement with progressive maintenance Life Cycle Cost Calculator Teaching concept– Not designed to replace a PMS, but to support network thinking. The lifecycle calculator lets you design a road treatment plan, demonstrating the ability to revive and preserve a road for 50 years or more. In Understanding the time-value of money, users can see that a dollar today is worth much more 15 years down the line. It pays to invest in your roads upfront. 21 RoadResource.org

Remaining Service Life How much life is your network gaining or losing each year? Remaining Service Life looks at the health of your network through your yearly treatment plan. A critical concept for network management: each mile of road has a life expectancy. Every year, each mile of road within your network uses one mile-year of life. That means that your network has a limited number of mile-years to live. RSL helps you understand the effectiveness of your annual treatment plan, to determine if that plan will add or subtract life from your network, and identify tweaks you can make to make overall, incremental “network-level” gains. 22 RoadResource.org

Cost-Benefit Value Which projects will give the “biggest bang for the buck?” Cost-Benefit-Value This formula prioritizes road projects. “Great, I know I should be treating all of my roads, every year, but that’s not realistic in any way.– Which projects will give me the biggest bang for the buck?? How do I prioritize limited resources?” CBV takes into account project size, overall cost, Average Annual Daily Traffic, and your annual budget --- each project is evaluated using a CBV figure to give you quantifiable comparison factors between projects. Allows users to see “No, this project isn’t very important for this year. I’ll address several others instead, and take a different approach next year” 23 RoadResource.org

Visit the new RoadResource.org